Malaysia

Court allows prosecution to amend charge in Lim Guan Eng RM6.3 billion tunnel corruption case

Sessions Court rules amendment necessary to align charge with MACC Act provisions, says no prejudice to defence

Updated 4 months ago · Published on 06 May 2026 11:51AM

Court allows prosecution to amend charge in Lim Guan Eng RM6.3 billion tunnel corruption case
DPP argues that the amendment is in compliance with legal requirements and does not prejudice the defence - May 6, 2026

THE Sessions Court in Kuala Lumpur has allowed an application by the prosecution to amend the first charge against former Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng in connection with the RM6.3 billion undersea tunnel and major road construction project corruption case.

Judge Azura Alwi granted the application after finding that the amendment was necessary to ensure the charge complies with Section 23 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009.

She ruled that although the amendment was made at the final stage of the prosecution’s case, it would not prejudice or cause any unfairness to Lim.

The court also noted that both parties retain the right under Section 162 of the Criminal Procedure Code to recall relevant witnesses following the amendment to the charge.

“Therefore, the court allowed the prosecution’s application to amend the charge in accordance with Section 158 of the Criminal Procedure Code,” she said.

The amended charge concerns allegations that Lim, then Chief Minister of Penang, used his position to obtain RM3.3 million in connection with the appointment of a company linked to former Consortium Zenith Construction Sdn Bhd director Datuk Zarul Ahmad Mohd Zulkifli for the Penang Major Road and Undersea Tunnel Project valued at RM6.3 billion.

The alleged offences took place between January 2011 and August 2017 at the Chief Minister’s Office in Penang.

During earlier proceedings, Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said the amendment only involved removing the word “receiving”, while the alleged sum of RM3.3 million remained part of the charge.

He argued that the change did not prejudice the defence, as their position remained unchanged in that Lim had never received the RM3.3 million.

“The amendment is in compliance with legal requirements and does not prejudice the defence,” he said.

He further noted that Section 23 of the MACC Act 2009 does not specifically require proof of “receiving” or “requesting” gratification, but rather focuses on actions taken for the purpose of obtaining a bribe or benefit. - May 6, 2026

Spotlight

Malaysia

UMNO launches donation drive to help Najib pay RM50 million fine – Zahid

Malaysia

Uni student charged over crash that killed four family members

Malaysia

Rafizi presses government to explain Najib house arrest terms

Malaysia

AirAsia brushes off financial concerns, says cash position strong

Malaysia

Najib granted conditional pardon, to serve remainder of sentence under house arrest

Business

Inflation picks up to 1.9% as transport, food prices rise

Malaysia

Two-lorry crash blocks all northbound PLUS lanes, leads to 7km traffic crawl

Malaysia

Negeri Sembilan SUK declines to gazette proclamation removing Tuanku Muhriz

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Police refer Noorazli speech probe to AGC after 93 statements recorded

You may be interested

Malaysia

Malaysia to sit on IAEA Board of Governors for 2026-2028 term

Malaysia

Police refer Noorazli speech probe to AGC after 93 statements recorded

Malaysia

Haze: 28 areas record unhealthy air quality

Malaysia

Anwar: MA63 is national commitment, not Sabah and Sarawak issue alone

Malaysia

BUDI Diesel transfer limit raised to three vehicles

Malaysia

RM35.24m drug haul: Foreigners allegedly ran international syndicate

Malaysia

Why should Malaysians pay Najib’s RM50 million fine?

By The Vibes Says

Malaysia

Aminuddin calls NS EXCO announcement an act of ‘derhaka’, seeks legal action