Malaysia

Court allows prosecution to amend charge in Lim Guan Eng RM6.3 billion tunnel corruption case

Sessions Court rules amendment necessary to align charge with MACC Act provisions, says no prejudice to defence

Updated 1 month ago · Published on 06 May 2026 11:51AM

Court allows prosecution to amend charge in Lim Guan Eng RM6.3 billion tunnel corruption case
DPP argues that the amendment is in compliance with legal requirements and does not prejudice the defence - May 6, 2026

THE Sessions Court in Kuala Lumpur has allowed an application by the prosecution to amend the first charge against former Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng in connection with the RM6.3 billion undersea tunnel and major road construction project corruption case.

Judge Azura Alwi granted the application after finding that the amendment was necessary to ensure the charge complies with Section 23 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009.

She ruled that although the amendment was made at the final stage of the prosecution’s case, it would not prejudice or cause any unfairness to Lim.

The court also noted that both parties retain the right under Section 162 of the Criminal Procedure Code to recall relevant witnesses following the amendment to the charge.

“Therefore, the court allowed the prosecution’s application to amend the charge in accordance with Section 158 of the Criminal Procedure Code,” she said.

The amended charge concerns allegations that Lim, then Chief Minister of Penang, used his position to obtain RM3.3 million in connection with the appointment of a company linked to former Consortium Zenith Construction Sdn Bhd director Datuk Zarul Ahmad Mohd Zulkifli for the Penang Major Road and Undersea Tunnel Project valued at RM6.3 billion.

The alleged offences took place between January 2011 and August 2017 at the Chief Minister’s Office in Penang.

During earlier proceedings, Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said the amendment only involved removing the word “receiving”, while the alleged sum of RM3.3 million remained part of the charge.

He argued that the change did not prejudice the defence, as their position remained unchanged in that Lim had never received the RM3.3 million.

“The amendment is in compliance with legal requirements and does not prejudice the defence,” he said.

He further noted that Section 23 of the MACC Act 2009 does not specifically require proof of “receiving” or “requesting” gratification, but rather focuses on actions taken for the purpose of obtaining a bribe or benefit. - May 6, 2026

Spotlight

Malaysia

Video of individuals, believed to be Rohingyas, sleeping in MRT goes viral

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Woman claims RM4 million condo transferred without consent after investment scheme collapse

Malaysia

Outstanding judgment paid to Teresa Kok, auction of Jamal's property called off

Malaysia

PH defers Johor MB post decision as Loke prioritises election victory

Events

International media networks need to be strengthened to face global challenges

By Ian McIntyre

Malaysia

Over 250 homes damaged in Bercham storm (video)

Malaysia

Johor state election: DAP bets on Malay candidate in Ulu Tiram

Opinion

ASEAN’s renaissance: A new lease of life in the multipolar world

You may be interested

Malaysia

UPKO accepted as GRS component party

Malaysia

Johor election: BN banks on track record, says Onn Hafiz

Malaysia

NHMS: At least one in four Malaysian teens depressed, suicidal tendencies rise

Malaysia

K9 unit deployed in manhunt after 15-year-old girl brutally assaulted and robbed

Malaysia

Malaysia's hidden nutrition crisis puts future workforce at risk, childhood obesity worsens

Malaysia

UPM industrial trainee's death caused by drowning, case classified as sudden death

Malaysia

44-year-old woman charged with murder of Indonesian

Malaysia

Removable sunshades allowed as long as visibility unaffected – minister clarifies