Malaysia

Court allows prosecution to amend charge in Lim Guan Eng RM6.3 billion tunnel corruption case

Sessions Court rules amendment necessary to align charge with MACC Act provisions, says no prejudice to defence

Updated 5 months ago · Published on 06 May 2026 11:51AM

Court allows prosecution to amend charge in Lim Guan Eng RM6.3 billion tunnel corruption case
DPP argues that the amendment is in compliance with legal requirements and does not prejudice the defence - May 6, 2026

THE Sessions Court in Kuala Lumpur has allowed an application by the prosecution to amend the first charge against former Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng in connection with the RM6.3 billion undersea tunnel and major road construction project corruption case.

Judge Azura Alwi granted the application after finding that the amendment was necessary to ensure the charge complies with Section 23 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009.

She ruled that although the amendment was made at the final stage of the prosecution’s case, it would not prejudice or cause any unfairness to Lim.

The court also noted that both parties retain the right under Section 162 of the Criminal Procedure Code to recall relevant witnesses following the amendment to the charge.

“Therefore, the court allowed the prosecution’s application to amend the charge in accordance with Section 158 of the Criminal Procedure Code,” she said.

The amended charge concerns allegations that Lim, then Chief Minister of Penang, used his position to obtain RM3.3 million in connection with the appointment of a company linked to former Consortium Zenith Construction Sdn Bhd director Datuk Zarul Ahmad Mohd Zulkifli for the Penang Major Road and Undersea Tunnel Project valued at RM6.3 billion.

The alleged offences took place between January 2011 and August 2017 at the Chief Minister’s Office in Penang.

During earlier proceedings, Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said the amendment only involved removing the word “receiving”, while the alleged sum of RM3.3 million remained part of the charge.

He argued that the change did not prejudice the defence, as their position remained unchanged in that Lim had never received the RM3.3 million.

“The amendment is in compliance with legal requirements and does not prejudice the defence,” he said.

He further noted that Section 23 of the MACC Act 2009 does not specifically require proof of “receiving” or “requesting” gratification, but rather focuses on actions taken for the purpose of obtaining a bribe or benefit. - May 6, 2026

Spotlight

Malaysia

Asyraf denies Najib ready to pay RM50m fine for house arrest

Malaysia

Malaysia’s average household size falls to 3.8 people

Malaysia

Najib's former wife Tengku Puteri Zainah in critical condition in ICU

Malaysia

More than 117,000 harmful online posts removed as government steps up enforcement

Malaysia

1,000 families receive Deepavali aid to ensure no one misses festive celebrations

Malaysia

Mother, daughter fined RM500 each for obstructing Muar council enforcement officers

Malaysia

Kelantan records 1,446 khalwat cases in three years

Malaysia

Negeri’s deposed Undang, chieftains fail to stop committal proceedings

You may be interested

Malaysia

IGP: Malaysia records 204,127 crime cases, falls short of projected threshold by 29.6%

Malaysia

Government shields households from data centre-driven utility costs

Malaysia

Jamil Khir to mount legal challenge against charges over RM860.3m Tabung Haji transactions

Malaysia

Anwar challenges Hadi over ‘Dajjal’ label

Malaysia

Cabinet has final say on government policies amid ministry differences - PM

Malaysia

Malaysia favours diplomacy over legal action in tackling transboundary haze with Indonesia

Malaysia

PH calls for 30% of Melaka council contracts to be channeled to youth

Malaysia

PLUS expects 2.24 million vehicles per day during Deepavali