Opinion

Zahid’s case key to uncovering abuse of charity foundations for political gain – C4 Centre

NGO explains why foundations are particularly vulnerable to abuse by politicians

Updated 2 years ago · Published on 25 Jan 2022 4:46PM

Zahid’s case key to uncovering abuse of charity foundations for political gain – C4 Centre
The C4 Centre is hoping that Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’s court case will shed light on how Yayasan Akalbudi’s funds were able to be channelled for his personal use, despite it being a foundation set up to receive and administer funds for the eradication of poverty. – Bernama pic, January 25, 2022

THE Centre to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4 Centre) welcomes the decision of the high court to order former deputy prime minister and current Umno president Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi to enter defence for all 47 counts of criminal breach of trust, bribery, and money laundering linked to tens of millions of ringgit of funds from Yayasan Akalbudi.

C4 Centre views this as a major development in uncovering the abuse of charitable foundations by politically linked individuals. Over the past few years, several foundations have been at the centre of major corruption scandals involving high-ranking political figures, including a former prime minister, a former Sabah chief minister, and a former Federal Territories minister.

According to C4 Centre’s report, Foundations and Donations: Political Financing, Corruption, and the Pursuit of Power published last year, foundations are particularly vulnerable to abuse by politicians for the following reasons:

1. Foundations can be used to covertly raise funds during the election campaign and non-campaign periods as they are far from the view of the electorate and oversight institutions such as the Electoral Commission.

2. There is no law to ensure donations to politically linked foundations are publicly disclosed. Foundations are also not legally obliged to publicly declare their donations to political parties or politicians.

3. Current laws overseeing election campaign financing do not pay heed to the flow of funds from foundations.

4. There is no disclosure about the sponsors of charitable foundations and how funds are channelled by them to parties or politicians.

The case of Zahid Hamidi and Yayasan Akalbudi was a subject of study in C4 Centre’s report.

It is hoped that the court case will answer several lingering questions surrounding Yayasan Akalbudi, including:

1. How did Yayasan Akalbudi, a private company registered under the Companies Commission of Malaysia (CCM), face no consequences for failing to file an AGM report or audit with CCM since its establishment?

2. How were Yayasan Akalbudi’s funds able to be channelled for Zahid Hamidi’s personal use, despite it being a foundation set up to receive and administer funds for the eradication of poverty?

3. What was the purpose of the RM9.3 million transfer from Yayasan Akalbudi to Yayasan Al-Falah (which is helmed by Zahid’s brother) three weeks after the Umno-led Barisan Nasional lost power in the 2018 general election? This case illustrates the severe vulnerabilities of charitable foundations to abuse and reiterates the need to reform political financing in Malaysia. This reform is all the more urgent in light of an impending general election where large flows of funds are expected to drive campaigns.

With this, C4 Centre calls for:

1. Parliament to immediately table a political funding law before GE15. A draft of this law has existed since the Pakatan Harapan administration yet has still not been made public.

2. Asset declaration laws are to be drafted as soon as possible to prevent the flow of secret and illicit wealth, especially within charitable foundations.

3. The introduction of proper regulations on political donations, including the following:

a. A list of permissible and non-permissible donors must be established.

b. Parties and election candidates must disclose the identities of donors who donate above a minimum amount.

c. Donations made to political parties must go directly into the party’s account.

d. Maximum donation limits must be introduced.

4. A registry of charitable foundations to be published online and available to be scrutinised by the public.

5. All politicians declare their connections to charitable foundations, both in their personal capacity and through family members. – The Vibes, January 25, 2022

C4 Centre is an independent non-profit policy advocacy group dedicated to upholding good governance

Related News

Malaysia / 5mth

Statutory body committee to regulate political funding to be appointed transparently: Ramkarpal

Malaysia / 10mth

[UPDATED] Check what I said, Anwar tells Muhyiddin on GE15 gambling funds claims

Opinion / 1y

CPI 2022: Malaysia’s regression ramps up urgency to fight corruption – C4 Centre

Malaysia / 1y

Be transparent in appointing advisers to govt: reform-oriented NGOs

Opinion / 1y

Anwar’s challenge to tackle M’sia’s money politics – Khairul Saidah, Rozaimah Zainudin

Malaysia / 1y

GE15: MACC, EC heads to be vetted before appointment, vows BN manifesto

Spotlight

Malaysia

KLIA shooting suspect arrested in Kota Baru, says IGP

Malaysia

Sarawak to develop 10 river basins for hydropower

By Stephen Then

Malaysia

KLIA police to use e-scooters to speed up response time, boost patrols

Malaysia

Budget hotels to raise rates by up to 40%

By Noel Achariam

Malaysia

45 heat-related illness cases reported nationwide

Malaysia

Surrender now, police tells KLIA gunman

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir