Opinion

Five punishment philosophies in the criminal justice system – Akhbar Satar

Why do Norway, Sweden have low recidivism rate compared to US, S’pore?

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 05 Sep 2022 8:00AM

Five punishment philosophies in the criminal justice system – Akhbar Satar
According to criminologists, there are five basic sentencing philosophies that justify why we punish those who break the law: retribution, incapacitation, rehabilitation, deterrence, and restoration. – The Vibes file pic, September 5, 2022

ON August 23, 2022, Datuk Seri Najib Razak was punished and sent to Kajang Prison after the Federal Court upheld his 12-year jail sentence and RM210 million fine for abuse of power, money laundering and criminal breach of trust over SRC International funds amounting to RM42 million.

Around the world, there are many types of criminal justice systems to maintain law and order and accomplish justice in their area of jurisdiction. For decades, the Malaysian criminal justice system has relied on punishment as the mechanism to reduce crime and recidivism or repeat offenders. 

Criminologists find that people obey the law not just because of their moral values but also because they are afraid of being punished. Psychologists believe that being socially conditioned as kids, knowing that those found making mistakes will receive punishment in return – is an important part of building a society which seeks to reduce crime and wrongdoing.

The theory of deterrence developed by criminologists Hobbes, Beccaria and Bentham states that the more severe a punishment, the more likely offenders will desist from criminal acts. 

A punishment that is not severe enough will not deter criminals from committing crimes. To prevent would-be criminals from committing crimes, criminal law must focus on penalties to ensure citizens respect the law of a country. 

Institute of Criminology at the University of Cambridge went further, stating that long-term imprisonment “changes people to the core”. Another argument would be prisons are ineffective based on recidivist statistics. 

The U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), states that 67.8% of released state prisoners were arrested for a new crime within three years, and 76.7% were rearrested within five years. 

A guard stands outside the Penang Remand Prison. Across the globe, different countries have developed different types of criminal justice systems to ensure maximum compliance to the law. – Bernama pic, September 5, 2022
A guard stands outside the Penang Remand Prison. Across the globe, different countries have developed different types of criminal justice systems to ensure maximum compliance to the law. – Bernama pic, September 5, 2022

Reducing recidivism protects society and improves former prisoners' life quality. This is why it is very important to treat them with effective prison reform while they are incarcerated.

As a result, Norway and Sweden have only about 20% recidivism.

The writer is sceptical when a former deputy prime minister stated that in 2017, the rate of repeated crimes among released convicts in the country stood at 7.6%, the lowest in the Asean region. But even in Singapore, the overall recidivism rate for the 2015 cohort of inmates was 25.9%.

Criminologists stated that five basic sentencing philosophies justify why we punish those who break the law: retribution, incapacitation, rehabilitation, deterrence, and restoration.

Retribution

Firstly, retribution or the concept of “an eye for an eye” is one of the oldest punishments representative of a heavy sentence. Retribution is punishment for crimes against the society and depriving offenders of their freedom by making them pay a debt back to society for the crimes they committed. 

The offender must be punished according to the seriousness of his crime. It is believed that retribution is reasonable justification for criminal punishment of wrongdoers. This theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished.

Modern examples of retribution include the widespread practices of imposing fines and enforcing mandatory sentencing policies for certain offences under the law. 

As an effective punishment, retribution has been criticised as being overly rigid and limited in its capacity to change societal behaviour. However, it still remains popular.

Incapacitation

Secondly, incapacitation focuses on removing and restricting the offender from society to commit future crime. These days’ prison has become how offenders are isolated from society so that they can no longer harm members of the public or commit crimes. 

However, some prisons have been described as a school and breeding grounds for crime, and it also trains convicts to commit heavier or more serious crimes.

The most extreme and severe form of incapacitation is capital punishment. Capital punishment is a legal penalty in Malaysia and Singapore. Capital punishment is often justified through the concept of deterrence, but whether the death sentence actually deters potential offenders is highly contested. 

What is indisputable is that once put to death an individual is incapable of committing further offences. Capital punishment is said therefore undeniably “effective” or the “final solution” in terms of its incapacitation. 

Crimes currently punishable by death in Malaysia include murder, drug trafficking, terrorism, kidnapping and possession of firearms. Last June, the Malaysian government announced that it has agreed to abolish the mandatory death penalty. The death penalty is a symptom of a culture of violence, not a solution to it, said Amnesty International (AI).

Whipping is widely used as a form of legal corporal punishment in Malaysia and Singapore. In Malaysia economic and financial crime cases such as section 409 of the Penal Code, it relates to criminal breach of trust (CBT) by a public servant or agent, which is punishable with a jail term of at least two years or up to 20 years and with whipping and shall also be liable to a fine. 

But the AI and United Nations Human Rights Committee have condemned corporal punishment including whipping as cruel, inhumane, degrading punishment and contrary to international human rights law. According to them, it has no place in a modern criminal justice system.

This is what a prison cell looks like in Sweden, furnished with basic amenities similar to a dorm room. By acknowledging that prisoners are still human beings and not depriving them of basic comfort and necessities, some countries are successful at keeping a low recidivism rate despite not subscribing to more aggressive forms of punishment. – Kriminalvalden pic, September 5, 2022
This is what a prison cell looks like in Sweden, furnished with basic amenities similar to a dorm room. By acknowledging that prisoners are still human beings and not depriving them of basic comfort and necessities, some countries are successful at keeping a low recidivism rate despite not subscribing to more aggressive forms of punishment. – Kriminalvalden pic, September 5, 2022


Rehabilitation

Thirdly, rehabilitation programmes are designed to help offenders and convert criminals into law-abiding citizens. 

Rehabilitation programmes provide offenders opportunities to acquire and develop job skills, overcome drug addictions and aggression and somehow ensure the offender reforms or learns how to deal with challenges they face upon release. Re-education courses are very important and necessary for the successful rehabilitation of offenders.

Deterrence

Fourthly, deterrence is intended to prevent future crime. The fear of going to prison is what is hoped will make someone think again before committing the crime. 

There are two types of deterrence, which are general deterrence and specific deterrence. General deterrence seeks to understand how an offender’s punishment can deter others from committing crimes while specific deterrence analyses how effective punishment can discourage an offender from repeating the crime.

Some schools of thought believe that if the primary purpose of punishment is to effect physical pain on the offenders, it does not serve any purpose. However, if it makes the offender realise the seriousness of the offence committed by him, and to repent, it achieves its ultimate goal. 

Restoration

Lastly, the country relies on a concept called “restorative justice”, a system of criminal justice which focuses on the rehabilitation, repair, and transformation of offenders through reconciliation with victims and the community members. It aims to restore the harm caused by crime, and take responsibility for their actions rather than punishing them. 

This restoration justice programme focuses on the victim’s perspective can give a chance to offenders to redeem, enable them to reintegrate into society and not repeat the same mistakes. Many studies show that it makes offenders less likely to re-offend.

The prison system in Norway is a unique approach, solely the restriction of liberty, and has right to vote and has been considered the best, most comfortable prison in the world, where the offenders have access to amenities such as a private bathroom, refrigerator, televisions and access to an outdoor environment with the lowest security and friendly guards. It has the lowest recidivism rate in the world. 

Norway has a strong system and institutions. Singapore has one of the worst prisons where the prisoners have no bedding and are only provided with a straw mat and two blankets.

Prisoners in Norway enjoy arts and crafts time making pottery and other forms of art. They live a full life while serving time in prison for their crime. Norway has only 20% recidivism rate. – The Story Institute pic, September 5, 2022
Prisoners in Norway enjoy arts and crafts time making pottery and other forms of art. They live a full life while serving time in prison for their crime. Norway has only 20% recidivism rate. – The Story Institute pic, September 5, 2022

What is the conclusion?

Punishment in any criminal system exists to serve justice to offenders and protect society. There are many theories and strategies introduced on how to address these issues. Any sentence which is passed to offenders must not only serve as a punishment but also as a reminder to others not to do the same and if possible bring them back to society as law-abiding citizens because ultimately that is what society wants. 

There must be efforts in helping them through professional reforming of offenders and the rehabilitation process in prison, especially in reducing the rate of recidivists and integrating them into society. – The Vibes, September 5, 2022

Datuk Seri Akhbar Satar is president of the Malaysian Association of Certified Fraud Examiners

Related News

Malaysia / 3w

Malaysia sees drastic increase in scam calls

Malaysia / 2mth

Sabah cracks the whip on squatter problems

Malaysia / 2mth

Govt nod for home detention of prisoners serving jail time of 4 years or less

Malaysia / 3mth

Issue of Najib’s pardon application discussed by Cabinet, says home minister

Opinion / 3mth

I beg your pardon – Rajan Navaratnam

Malaysia / 4mth

Only handful of cops with issues, involved in crime, says IGP

Spotlight

Malaysia

Ex-inspector escapes gallows, gets 33 years for wife’s murder

Malaysia

Foreigners make up 10% of Malaysia population

Malaysia

Muhyiddin, Hadi irreplaceable, say Perikatan leaders

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Cop pleads not guilty to student’s murder

Malaysia

Banks warn about scammers who impersonate NSRC officers

Malaysia

Jeffrey recalls memories of ISA confinement 33 years later

By Jason Santos