Malaysia

Judge dismisses Rosmah’s second bid to recuse him from trial

Parties should not be allowed to litigate the same issue over and over again, he says

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 25 Apr 2022 6:24PM

Judge dismisses Rosmah’s second bid to recuse him from trial
Judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan, in dismissing Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor’s application, says the second application is based considerably on the same grounds as the first application, namely the fact that he is the presiding judge in her solar hybrid trial. – The Vibes file pic, April 25, 2022

KUALA LUMPUR – Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor has failed again to recuse high court judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan from presiding over her money laundering and tax evasion trial.

This is the second time the wife of former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak filed the application after Zaini, who is also the same judge in Rosmah’s solar hybrid trial, had rejected Rosmah’s application last December 14 to recuse him from hearing the trial.

Judge Zaini, in dismissing Rosmah’s application, said the second application is based considerably on the same grounds as the first application, namely the fact that he is the presiding judge in Rosmah’s solar hybrid trial.

The judge said the applicant (Rosmah), however, has now sought to include two other cases that he presided over, namely the 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) forfeiture case where the applicant was one of the respondents and the 1MDB audit case.

“What the applicant had done in including these two additional cases was to add more colour to her application. It is, however, in essence, the same as the grounds submitted are similar to the first application as they pertain to my involvement and decisions made in these cases.

“I must add that I was bemused that the applicant had mentioned the 1MDB forfeiture and 1MDB audit cases in her application. I had, in the 1MDB forfeiture case, dismissed the prosecution’s attempt to forfeit properties belonging to her.

“The 1MDB audit case, on the other hand, does not concern the applicant at all. I am of the opinion that the applicant is estopped from litigating again the application for recusal. The doctrine of res judicata applies in this second application,” he said.

Zaini further said the initial arguments that the applicant has put forward in respect of the 1MDB forfeiture and 1MDB audit cases could have been canvassed in the first application as they were well within the applicant’s knowledge at that time when the first application was made.

“Public interest demands that there must be a finality to litigation and parties should not be allowed to litigate the same issue over and over again. The applicant’s application is therefore dismissed,” he said.

However, judge Zaini granted an application by Rosmah’s counsel Datuk Firoz Hussein Ahmad Jamaluddin to stay the money laundering trial, which was initially scheduled on Wednesday (April 27), pending the disposal of Rosmah’s appeal on today’s decision at the Court of Appeal.

“The trial is therefore vacated,” said the judge after the prosecution did not object to the stay application.            

Rosmah’s appeal over the first failed recusal bid is still pending before the Court of Appeal. The appeal has been fixed for case management on May 19.

Meanwhile, judge Zaini also fixed May 24 for mention over Rosmah’s bid to disqualify former Federal Court judge Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram from acting as the lead prosecutor in her money laundering case.

Rosmah, 70, is facing 12 money laundering charges involving RM7,097,750 and five counts of failure to declare her income to the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN).

The offences were allegedly committed at Affin Bank Bhd, Bangunan Getah Asli branch, Jalan Ampang, here, between December 4, 2013 and June 8, 2017, and at LHDN at Kompleks Bangunan Kerajaan, Jalan Tuanku Abdul Halim, here, between May 1, 2014 and May 1, 2018. – Bernama, April 25, 2022

Related News

Malaysia / 19h

British management on trial – does a royal management institute deliver value?

Malaysia / 1mth

Court quashes RM313.8 million tax bill against Na’imah

Malaysia / 2mth

High Court court allows contempt proceedings against Undangs, two others

Malaysia / 2mth

'No case to answer' in suit against Vinod Sekhar

Malaysia / 4mth

Shamsul Iskandar files appeal to transfer corruption case to high court

Malaysia / 4mth

Court of Appeal: Emergency proclamations beyond judicial review

Spotlight

Opinion

“I’m not a war criminal, I’m a patriot”: Shavendra Silva’s amnesia tour meets the receipts

By Abbi Kanthasamy

Malaysia

British management on trial – does a royal management institute deliver value?

Malaysia

Doctor among five killed in Sarawak Flying Doctor helicopter crash identified

Malaysia

Nearly 10,000 potential fire hotspots detected on RSPO-managed land

Malaysia

Undang Yang Empat produces letter allegedly confirming Tuanku Muhriz’s removal

Malaysia

Northern Malaysia must prepare for the consequences of lower rainfall

Malaysia

Helicopter crashes during flying doctor service mission in Sarawak

You may be interested

Malaysia

Undang Yang Empat produces letter allegedly confirming Tuanku Muhriz’s removal

Malaysia

Six face court over alleged rape of same 15-year-old girl in Perlis

Malaysia

Negeri Sembilan MB silent on alleged Ruler removal letter

Malaysia

Anwar: Tun Razak’s ‘Three Cs’ warning still relevant today

Malaysia

Zara Qairina Inquest: Father last saw daughter in 2017, Coroner’s Court told

Malaysia

Flying Doctor Service to continue despite fatal Sarawak crash

Malaysia

PH says rule of law must prevail in high-profile corruption cases

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Anwar calls for ASEAN haze mechanism review, says Malaysia won’t shield wrongdoers