Music

Trial begins into whether Ed Sheeran stole Marvin Gaye classic

The lawsuit alleges striking similarities between Gaye's classic Let's Get It On and Sheeran's 2014 hit Thinking Out Loud

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 25 Apr 2023 9:00AM

Trial begins into whether Ed Sheeran stole Marvin Gaye classic
This is not the first time Sheeran has been taken to court over copyright issues, having testified in court last year in a case over his hit song Shape of You. – AFP file pic, April 25, 2023

NEW YORK – Jury selection began Monday in a trial to determine whether British pop star Ed Sheeran plagiarised American music legend Marvin Gaye's Let's Get It On in his 2014 hit Thinking Out Loud.

The plaintiffs are the heirs of Ed Townsend, a musician and producer who co-wrote Gaye's 1973 soul classic.

They allege that there are "striking similarities and overt common elements" between Gaye's sultry classic and Sheeran's Thinking Out Loud.

It's not the first time Sheeran has been taken to court, as copyright lawsuits in the music industry flourish. 

Sheeran testified in a London court in April last year in a case centred around his song Shape of You. He is among the potential witnesses to be called in this trial as well, in which opening arguments were due to begin Tuesday after a jury is selected, a lawyer working on the case told AFP. 

Townsend's family has pointed out that the group Boyz II Men has performed mash-ups of the two songs, and that Sheeran has blended the songs together on stage as well.

Sheeran's team contests the allegations, saying "there are dozens if not hundreds of songs that predate and postdate" Gaye's song, "utilising the same or similar chord progression."

"These medleys are irrelevant to any issue in the case and would be misleading [and] confuse the jury."

Sheeran's Thinking Out Loud shot up America's Billboard Hot 100 charts when it was released, and won Sheeran a Grammy Award for Song of the Year in 2016.

The lawsuit, filed in 2016 – and refiled in 2017 after being rejected on procedural grounds – also names Sony.

In Sheeran's London trial, the singer called the lawsuit emblematic of copyright litigation that goes too far, potentially stifling creativity.

The judge agreed, declaring that Sheeran had "neither deliberately nor subconsciously copied" part of the melody in the song Oh Why by Sami Chokri and Ross O'Donoghue.

The judge acknowledged similarities between the two songs, but ultimately ruled there were large differences, and that Chokri's lawyers failed to prove Sheeran had ever heard the song.

Gaye's family is not part of the New York lawsuit against Sheeran, though his estate successfully sued the artists Robin Thicke, Pharrell Williams, and T.I. over similarities between the song Blurred Lines and Gaye's Got to Give it Up. – AFP, April 25, 2023

Related News

Culture & Lifestyle / 3mth

Iconic Penang House of Music to close its doors

Business / 5mth

Global association urges Malaysia to intensify copyright enforcement

Business / 7mth

Fifteen investors sue MyAirline co-founder Goh

Malaysia / 7mth

Penang CM to sue tycoon for allegedly ‘smearing’ reputation

Music / 8mth

‘Barbie’ proving a hit in theatres, music charts

Music / 8mth

Language learning gets a boost from the music charts

Spotlight

Malaysia

Usno leader calls for Sabah govt overhaul after legal blunder

By Jason Santos

World

Iran president, foreign minister die in copter crash

Malaysia

UiTM vice-chancellor denies students in black are protesters

Malaysia

PAS denounces Teresa Kok death threat

Malaysia

UiTM admissions backlash sign of misplaced priorities, say academics

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Teresa Kok gets 2 bullets in mailbox