Malaysia

Indira Gandhi sues PDRM, three others for failure to find and return daughter

Mother of Prasana Diksa, 12, claims defendants had directly caused her separation from her youngest daughter

Updated 3 years ago · Published on 28 Oct 2020 9:45PM

Indira Gandhi sues PDRM, three others for failure to find and return daughter
Indira, 45, filed the suit through Messrs Raj & Sach via e-filing and named the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), PDRM, Home Ministry and the Government of Malaysia as the defendants. – Hakam filepic, October 28, 2020

KUALA LUMPUR – Kindergarten teacher M. Indira Gandhi is suing the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) and three others for RM100 million for their failure to find and bring back her youngest daughter, who was abducted by her Muslim convert ex-husband, Muhammad Riduan Abdullah, 11 years ago.

Indira, 45, filed the suit through Messrs Raj & Sach via e-filing and named the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), PDRM, Home Ministry and the Government of Malaysia as the defendants.

In her statement of claim, Indira claimed that the IGP had deliberately and negligently ignored the mandamus order from the Federal Court and failed to investigate or take appropriate action to return her daughter, Prasana Diksa, to her.

She claimed that the IGP in his press statement dated January 27, 2020, said that he knew the whereabouts of her ex-husband, formerly known as K. Patmanathan, 51, and was trying to get a ‘happy ending’ for the plaintiff.

“Based on the statement, it clearly showed that the first defendant failed to arrest Muhammad Riduan ( Patmanathan) and return Prasana to me despite knowing his whereabouts,” she said.

Indira also claimed that all the defendants had played their roles in making decisions or ordering the PDRM to execute the committal warrant against Muhammad Riduan as ordered by the Federal Court on April 29, 2016.

She claimed that the behaviour of all the defendants had directly caused her separation from her youngest daughter, who is now 12, to continue until today and that their behaviour had also caused Mohd Riduan to flee.

She is seeking RM100 million in general, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as a declaration that the first defendant had committed the tort of nonfeasance in public office, and the second, third and fourth defendants were also vicariously liable for the tort of nonfeasance committed by the first defendant.

Indira and Patmanathan married on April 10, 1993, and have three children.

However, she said, on March 11, 2009, Patmanathan converted to Islam and changed the religion of their three children to Islam and that on September 29, 2009, he had also obtained the custody of the three children from Ipoh Syariah Court.

The plaintiff said she then filed an application for full custody of the children which was granted by Ipoh High Court on March 11, 2010.

However, Prasana was forcibly taken by Muhammad Riduan after the court ordered him to hand over the children to their mother. 

The couple divorced on August 8, 2012. – Bernama, October 28, 2020

Spotlight

Malaysia

PRS proposes party president to fill vacant Senate president’s post

Malaysia

Ex-inspector escapes gallows, gets 33 years for wife’s murder

Malaysia

Foreigners make up 10% of Malaysia population

Malaysia

Cop pleads not guilty to student’s murder

Malaysia

Banks warn about scammers who impersonate NSRC officers

Malaysia

Jeffrey recalls memories of ISA confinement 33 years later

By Jason Santos

You may be interested

Malaysia

Former chief ministers turn up for SLS review appeal

By Jason Santos

Malaysia

Ex-inspector escapes gallows, gets 33 years for wife’s murder

Malaysia

UiTM Bumiputera-only admission policy stays

Malaysia

SLS appeal hearing draws strong police presence

Malaysia

Political shifts, persistent poverty of Kota Marudu

By Jason Santos

Malaysia

Foreigners make up 10% of Malaysia population

Malaysia

Pantry@Mont Kiara serve affordable food to help needy

By Noel Achariam

Malaysia

Sarawak to charge 5% forest carbon trading fee

By Desmond Davidson