Business

High Court dismisses bid to strike out securities fraud abetment charge

Daniel Wong Jit Kiang, accused of abetting the late Multi-Code Electronics Managing Director in a RM17.6 million securities fraud, has failed in his attempt to have the charge struck out.

Updated 10 months ago · Published on 18 Oct 2025 5:46PM

High Court dismisses bid to strike out securities fraud abetment charge
The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled that the charge remains valid, despite no conviction against the principal offender under securities law - October 18, 2025

THE Kuala Lumpur High Court has rejected an application by Daniel Wong Jit Kiang (also known as Daniel Wong) to strike out a charge of abetment relating to a major securities fraud involving RM17.6 million.

Wong stands accused of abetting the late Toh Chun Toh Gordon, then Managing Director of Multi-Code Electronics Industries (M) Berhad (Multi-Code), in allegedly defrauding the company in 2007.

The charge, brought under section 122C(c) read with section 87A(b) of the Securities Industries Act 1983 (SIA), pertains to the alleged misuse of Multi-Code’s funds between 26 and 28 March 2007 to finance the purchase of over 11 million of its own shares by Ace Prelude Sdn. Bhd.

Presiding over the matter, Justice Muniandy a/l Kannyappan ruled that the charge was neither defective nor invalid. The court dismissed Wong’s claim that the charge should be nullified on the grounds that Toh had not been convicted under section 87A(b) of the SIA.

Toh, the principal offender, was instead convicted of an alternative charge under section 409 of the Penal Code for criminal breach of trust (CBT) and passed away in August 2012 while appealing his conviction.

The Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) argued that the absence of a conviction against Toh under securities law did not affect the validity of the abetment charge against Wong. The High Court agreed, affirming that “the offence of abetting is distinct from that committed by the principal offender” and concluded that the charge should stand.

“It is not the Court’s role to second-guess the charge at this juncture,” Justice Muniandy said, adding that it would be premature to set it aside.

The charge carries a potential penalty of a minimum RM1 million fine and up to 10 years’ imprisonment.

Wong was arrested on 8 May 2024 after 15 years at large, despite two warrants of arrest issued in 2009 and 2019. He was formally charged on 9 May 2024 at the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court.

The SC was represented by Deputy Public Prosecutor Hashley Tajudin along with prosecuting officers Mohd Shafiq Azman, Raihana Nadhira Rafidi, and Caysseny Tean Boonsiri. Wong was represented by Dato’ Hariharan Tara Singh and Tan Eng Seng.

The trial will proceed in the Sessions Court as scheduled. - October 18, 2025

Spotlight

Malaysia

Private university CFO charged over alleged RM6.56m CBT

World

Unleashed 60kg dog in Hong Kong mauls poodle, bichon frise to death (video)

Malaysia

Three family members killed after Immigration truck runs red light

Malaysia

Woman, believed to be foreigner, allegedly causes disturbance at KLIA (video)

Opinion

Has DAP chosen the path to a slow death?

Malaysia

Three years of bullying at school puts 15-year-old at risk of hearing loss

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Police officer's wife cries, pleads for leniency after misusing disabled child's account

Malaysia

Organised cybergroups likely behind rise in racial hate on social media

You may be interested

Business

Oil prices hold above US$84 as Middle East tensions persist

Business

Independent review needed, not blind denial, to address US claims – maritime expert

Business

Oil prices surge as US-Iran standoff, Ukraine strikes rattle global energy markets

Business

Tey Por Yee and four others ordered to pay RM103.75m in SC civil suit

Business

FMM urges input tax credits as government reviews GST features for SST