Business

Decision on Deloitte's judicial review application set for November 18

Deloitte was fined RM2.2m by the Malaysian Securities Commission

Updated 5 years ago · Published on 26 Oct 2020 1:50PM

Decision on Deloitte's judicial review application set for November 18
On November 25, 2019, Justice Mariana granted leave to Deloitte to commence its judicial review application. — Bernama pic, October 26, 2020

KUALA LUMPUR — The high court has set November 18 for the decision on a judicial review application by Deloitte PLT to challenge a ruling by the Securities Commission of Malaysia (SC) for dismissing a review application of the RM2.2 million fine imposed on the auditing firm.

Counsel Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, representing Deloitte, informed the date when contacted via WhatsApp.

The matter was supposed to be decided by Justice Datuk Mariana Yahya today, but it has since been vacated following the implementation of the Conditional Movement Control Order in Selangor, Putrajaya and Kuala Lumpur from October 14 to 27.

It was reported earlier that the SC fined Deloitte a total of RM2.2 million for four breaches linked to the RM2.4 bilion bond (sukuk) issued by Bandar Malaysia Sdn Bhd (BMSB), a 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) subsidiary in 2014.

Deloitte was the statutory auditor for BMSB and 1MDB Real Estate Sdn Bhd (1MDB RE), now known as TRX City Sdn Bhd, for their financial years ended March 31, 2015 to 2016.

On November 14, 2019, Deloitte filed the judicial review application against the SC's decision to dismiss its application to review the administrative sanctions and retained the sanctions imposed.

On November 25, 2019, Justice Mariana granted leave to Deloitte to commence its judicial review application.

In its application, the auditing firm is seeking to overturn the SC's review decision on Aug 19, 2019, which maintained the RM2.2 million fine against Deloitte imposed on January 30, 2019.

Deloitte is also seeking for a certiorari order to quash the SC's review decision to impose the fine, besides seeking for the return of the RM2.2 million it paid as a fine to SC in the event that the court rules in favour of its judicial review application, costs and any further order deemed fit and appropriate by the court. — Bernama, October 26, 2020

Related News

Malaysia / 2w

Former PM Ismail Sabri expected to be charged tomorrow

Malaysia / 2y

20 NGOs back govt ban on Israeli-flagged ships

Malaysia / 2y

Fahmi denies govt removing social media content amid criticism

Malaysia / 2y

Sarawak wants to emulate Emirates Airline’s success

Sports & Fitness / 2y

Norza makes ‘u-turn’ to stay as BAM president

Malaysia / 2y

Azalina claims certain bids to disrupt criminal proceedings against Stampa

Spotlight

Malaysia

Private university CFO charged over alleged RM6.56m CBT

World

Unleashed 60kg dog in Hong Kong mauls poodle, bichon frise to death (video)

Malaysia

Three family members killed after Immigration truck runs red light

Malaysia

Woman, believed to be foreigner, allegedly causes disturbance at KLIA (video)

Opinion

Has DAP chosen the path to a slow death?

Malaysia

Three years of bullying at school puts 15-year-old at risk of hearing loss

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Police officer's wife cries, pleads for leniency after misusing disabled child's account

Malaysia

Organised cybergroups likely behind rise in racial hate on social media

You may be interested

Business

Oil prices hold above US$84 as Middle East tensions persist

Business

Tey Por Yee and four others ordered to pay RM103.75m in SC civil suit

Business

FMM urges input tax credits as government reviews GST features for SST