Malaysia

NSC Act repugnant to constitution, says minority judgment in Anwar’s case

Justices Datuk Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal, Datuk Vernon Ong say law has emergency-like powers, violates fundamental rights

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 16 Aug 2021 9:00AM

NSC Act repugnant to constitution, says minority judgment in Anwar’s case
Two Federal Court judges say that since the NSC Act was not enacted under the Article 149 of the constitution, it ranks as an ordinary law and is inconsistent with certain guaranteed liberties. – Wikipedia pic, August 16, 2021

by Arjun Mohanakrishnan

KUALA LUMPUR – The National Security Council Act 2017 (NSCA) violates fundamental liberties and the federal constitution, said the minority judges who presided over opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s challenge against the constitutionality of the legislation.

Before coming to such a conclusion, Federal Court judges Datuk Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal and Datuk Vernon Ong first determined if NSCA is indeed a security law.

They pointed towards Section 18 of the Act – which allows the Agong to declare a particular place as a security area – which they find strikingly similar to the emergency proclamation provision under Article 150(1) of the federal constitution.

They are also concerned about the “special powers” of the National Security Council within security areas that allows controlling movement, taking possession of property, as well as wide powers of arrest, search and seizure.

“In the light of the foregoing, it is clear that NSCA is a security law containing sweeping powers that restrict fundamental liberties,” read the minority judgment.

Datuk Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal is one of two judges who ruled NSCA as invalid, and a law that goes against the federal constitution. – Kehakiman.gov.my pic, August 16, 2021
Datuk Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal is one of two judges who ruled NSCA as invalid, and a law that goes against the federal constitution. – Kehakiman.gov.my pic, August 16, 2021

Next, Harmindar and Ong determined whether NSCA is a security law that must be enacted under Article 149 of the federal constitution.

This provision concerns the enacting of laws against “subversion, action prejudicial to public order, etc”. It provides that laws designed to prevent or stop certain types of subversive acts will be valid despite inconsistencies with fundamental liberties provided for in the federal constitution itself.

In simpler terms, a parliamentary law made under Article 149 can essentially violate certain constitutional fundamental liberties – particularly the right to personal liberty; freedom of movement, speech, assembly and association; and, the right to property.

NSCA, however, was not enacted under Article 149, but Article 77 – as with any other ordinary law.

To determine if Article 149 should have been the lawful method in which to enact NSCA, Harmindar and Ong made reference to the notorious repealed Internal Security Act (ISA), which was enacted under the constitutional provision.

“There are provisions in NSCA that are strikingly similar to ISA in character and substance,” read the minority judgment.

In particular, there are similar provisions on the power of declaration of a security area and powers relating to security area that include the power to arrest without warrant, impose a curfew, control movement, relocate persons and take possession of property, among other things.”

They further stated that when the Bill was proposed to Parliament, the minister-in-charge said while NSCA is a law on national security and public order, reference to Article 149 is not necessary, given it does not infringe fundamental liberties.

“It is clear that the minister’s statement that NSCA will not impinge on fundamental liberties is not an accurate representation of the true nature and character of NSCA.

“There are clear provisions in NSCA that contravene fundamental rights.”

NSCA should have come within the ambit of Article 149, they added.

As it was not enacted under that constitutional provision, the Act “ranks as an ordinary law”, which is inconsistent with federal constitution provisions related to fundamental liberties.

Datuk Vernon Ong and another fellow judge are concerned about the ‘special powers’ of the NSC, such as its wide powers of arrest, search and seizure. – Kehakiman.gov.my, August 16, 2021
Datuk Vernon Ong and another fellow judge are concerned about the ‘special powers’ of the NSC, such as its wide powers of arrest, search and seizure. – Kehakiman.gov.my, August 16, 2021

“NSCA is an Act that is clearly repugnant to the constitution. The choice is therefore between upholding NSCA or the constitution. Under our federal constitution, the choice is made plain – NSCA is void.”

In February last year, the Federal Court refused to answer Anwar’s constitutional questions concerning NSCA, as he failed to show that the legislation’s provisions had interfered with his personal life.

The opposition leader filed an application to review the decision, and received assent to have his case reheard in September.

On August 7, the apex court ruled that NSCA is a valid and constitutional law in a 5-2 majority decision.

The majority verdict was read by justice Datuk Zaleha Yusof. The other members of the bench who concurred with her were justices Datuk Mary Lim, Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof, Datuk Seri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim and Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang. – The Vibes, August 16, 2021

Related News

Opinion / 3w

Why Bersama is not Malaysia’s best hope

People / 3mth

With no SPM, housewife studies law to help save son charged with murder

Opinion / 4mth

A civilizational moment for Malaysia: From Al-Attas to Osman Bakar

Opinion / 5mth

Government Procurement Bill 2025: Evidence of government’s firm stance against corruption

Malaysia / 8mth

 PM’s claim of compliance on Sabah’s 40% share conflicts with court ruling, says Roger Chin

Malaysia / 9mth

Nation on right track towards economic objectives, say economists

Spotlight

Malaysia

‘No such thing as Bangkok Move or Dubai Move’ – Ahmad Zahid

Malaysia

KSN: Rectify long waiting times, service challenges and workforce constraints at UMMC now

Malaysia

LGE trial: 4 to 5 meetings held before open tender bidding for road, undersea tunnel projects - witness

Malaysia

Najib marks 73rd birthday as legal battles continue from behind prison walls

Malaysia

Court orders police to probe foreign management institute

Malaysia

UMNO pushes back against Hamzah’s ‘PBN’ proposal, says BN-PN cooperation is not a new coalition

Malaysia

Form four student killed after car crosses into opposite lane in Setiu crash

World

France heatwave death toll rises to nearly 5,800 as extreme temperatures trigger record mortality

Culture

Penang: Three refurbished tourism attractions to be ‘reopened’ soon

By Ian McIntyre

You may be interested

Malaysia

BN-PN alliance could secure 25 seats in Negeri Sembilan - Ahmad Maslan

Malaysia

Johari holds first talks with USTR Greer to balance US trade measures

Malaysia

UMNO pushes back against Hamzah’s ‘PBN’ proposal, says BN-PN cooperation is not a new coalition

Malaysia

Teen 'transporter' arrested as police seize RM3.04 million in Johor meth crack down

Malaysia

‘No such thing as Bangkok Move or Dubai Move’ – Ahmad Zahid

Malaysia

Malaysia will not bow to US congressional pressure over Israeli nationals’ issue - Loke (UPDATED)

Malaysia

Unity Government’s record allows for greater cost-of-living relief - Anwar

Malaysia

LGE trial: 4 to 5 meetings held before open tender bidding for road, undersea tunnel projects - witness