Malaysia

NSC Act repugnant to constitution, says minority judgment in Anwar’s case

Justices Datuk Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal, Datuk Vernon Ong say law has emergency-like powers, violates fundamental rights

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 16 Aug 2021 9:00AM

NSC Act repugnant to constitution, says minority judgment in Anwar’s case
Two Federal Court judges say that since the NSC Act was not enacted under the Article 149 of the constitution, it ranks as an ordinary law and is inconsistent with certain guaranteed liberties. – Wikipedia pic, August 16, 2021

by Arjun Mohanakrishnan

KUALA LUMPUR – The National Security Council Act 2017 (NSCA) violates fundamental liberties and the federal constitution, said the minority judges who presided over opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s challenge against the constitutionality of the legislation.

Before coming to such a conclusion, Federal Court judges Datuk Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal and Datuk Vernon Ong first determined if NSCA is indeed a security law.

They pointed towards Section 18 of the Act – which allows the Agong to declare a particular place as a security area – which they find strikingly similar to the emergency proclamation provision under Article 150(1) of the federal constitution.

They are also concerned about the “special powers” of the National Security Council within security areas that allows controlling movement, taking possession of property, as well as wide powers of arrest, search and seizure.

“In the light of the foregoing, it is clear that NSCA is a security law containing sweeping powers that restrict fundamental liberties,” read the minority judgment.

Datuk Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal is one of two judges who ruled NSCA as invalid, and a law that goes against the federal constitution. – Kehakiman.gov.my pic, August 16, 2021
Datuk Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal is one of two judges who ruled NSCA as invalid, and a law that goes against the federal constitution. – Kehakiman.gov.my pic, August 16, 2021

Next, Harmindar and Ong determined whether NSCA is a security law that must be enacted under Article 149 of the federal constitution.

This provision concerns the enacting of laws against “subversion, action prejudicial to public order, etc”. It provides that laws designed to prevent or stop certain types of subversive acts will be valid despite inconsistencies with fundamental liberties provided for in the federal constitution itself.

In simpler terms, a parliamentary law made under Article 149 can essentially violate certain constitutional fundamental liberties – particularly the right to personal liberty; freedom of movement, speech, assembly and association; and, the right to property.

NSCA, however, was not enacted under Article 149, but Article 77 – as with any other ordinary law.

To determine if Article 149 should have been the lawful method in which to enact NSCA, Harmindar and Ong made reference to the notorious repealed Internal Security Act (ISA), which was enacted under the constitutional provision.

“There are provisions in NSCA that are strikingly similar to ISA in character and substance,” read the minority judgment.

In particular, there are similar provisions on the power of declaration of a security area and powers relating to security area that include the power to arrest without warrant, impose a curfew, control movement, relocate persons and take possession of property, among other things.”

They further stated that when the Bill was proposed to Parliament, the minister-in-charge said while NSCA is a law on national security and public order, reference to Article 149 is not necessary, given it does not infringe fundamental liberties.

“It is clear that the minister’s statement that NSCA will not impinge on fundamental liberties is not an accurate representation of the true nature and character of NSCA.

“There are clear provisions in NSCA that contravene fundamental rights.”

NSCA should have come within the ambit of Article 149, they added.

As it was not enacted under that constitutional provision, the Act “ranks as an ordinary law”, which is inconsistent with federal constitution provisions related to fundamental liberties.

Datuk Vernon Ong and another fellow judge are concerned about the ‘special powers’ of the NSC, such as its wide powers of arrest, search and seizure. – Kehakiman.gov.my, August 16, 2021
Datuk Vernon Ong and another fellow judge are concerned about the ‘special powers’ of the NSC, such as its wide powers of arrest, search and seizure. – Kehakiman.gov.my, August 16, 2021

“NSCA is an Act that is clearly repugnant to the constitution. The choice is therefore between upholding NSCA or the constitution. Under our federal constitution, the choice is made plain – NSCA is void.”

In February last year, the Federal Court refused to answer Anwar’s constitutional questions concerning NSCA, as he failed to show that the legislation’s provisions had interfered with his personal life.

The opposition leader filed an application to review the decision, and received assent to have his case reheard in September.

On August 7, the apex court ruled that NSCA is a valid and constitutional law in a 5-2 majority decision.

The majority verdict was read by justice Datuk Zaleha Yusof. The other members of the bench who concurred with her were justices Datuk Mary Lim, Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof, Datuk Seri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim and Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang. – The Vibes, August 16, 2021

Related News

People / 1mth

With no SPM, housewife studies law to help save son charged with murder

Opinion / 2mth

A civilizational moment for Malaysia: From Al-Attas to Osman Bakar

Opinion / 4mth

Government Procurement Bill 2025: Evidence of government’s firm stance against corruption

Malaysia / 7mth

 PM’s claim of compliance on Sabah’s 40% share conflicts with court ruling, says Roger Chin

Malaysia / 7mth

Nation on right track towards economic objectives, say economists

Malaysia / 7mth

Rape suspects still face punishment though they are under 18 years old – Azalina

Spotlight

Business

Tycoon Vincent Tan trims BCorp stake further in RM115m share sale

Malaysia

UMNO’s solo gamble in Johor: A show of strength or risky miscalculation?

By The Vibes Says

Malaysia

Nik Aziz’s grandson allegedly slapped by senator: Father ready to take case to court

Malaysia

Lorry driver jailed a day, fined for making obscene gestures, dangerous driving (video)

Malaysia

PKR leader defends MyKhas access suspension for PJ, Subang MPs, cites ‘political choices’

Opinion

Social media set to dominate Johor polls as election kingmaker

Malaysia

Man charged in Butterworth parang attack case that left victim fearing permanent disability

Malaysia

Teen mothers must return to school, says Fadhlina as education remains priority

Malaysia

Penang water tariffs to increase from July 1 after year-long deferment

You may be interested

Malaysia

Malaysians may soon be able to get a 10-year passport for RM350

Malaysia

Toh Puan Na'imah’s legal team cautions against ‘dangerous’ application of SOSMA

Malaysia

METMalaysia urges calm after tremors felt across Sabah, Sarawak following minor earthquakes

Malaysia

Police looking for trio involved in violent armed robbery in Penang (video)

Malaysia

Fadillah warns of finite fossil fuels, global volatility and rising demand

Malaysia

Press conference cancelled as MB has 'important business'

Malaysia

PKR leader defends MyKhas access suspension for PJ, Subang MPs, cites ‘political choices’

Malaysia

Pahang police logistics chief killed in motorcycle crash on Genting road