Malaysia

MACC invoked restriction order, not asset freeze, in Daim-linked probe – Dzulkifli

Former MACC chief clarifies that Section 53 of AMLA was used to restrict dealings during investigation, not to imply wrongdoing

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 03 Jun 2025 6:52PM

MACC invoked restriction order, not asset freeze, in Daim-linked probe – Dzulkifli
This order is intended to prevent any dealings involving the said assets while investigations by the MACC are ongoing - June 3, 2025

THE Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) move involving over RM750 million in assets linked to the family of the late Tun Daim Zainuddin was a restriction order under Section 53 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA), and not a freezing of assets, said former MACC Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Dzulkifli Ahmad.

In a statement on Monday, Dzulkifli emphasised the importance of distinguishing between the two legal terms, as they fall under different provisions and entail separate legal procedures.

“This order is intended to prevent any dealings involving the said assets while investigations by the MACC are ongoing,” he explained.

“It does not mean that any wrongdoing or legal breach has been established with respect to the assets.”

He clarified that the restriction order was issued by the High Court via an ex parte application — meaning it was granted without notice to or the presence of the affected party.

Dzulkifli further explained that a freezing order typically refers to Section 44 of AMLA and is generally applied to bank accounts or financial instruments. In contrast, the MACC’s action in this case invoked Section 53, which applies to overseas assets believed to be linked to unlawful activities.

He also noted that the AMLA (Amendment) Act 2025, which contains revisions to Section 53, received Royal Assent on 24 April but has yet to come into effect.

“The amendment will extend the duration of a restriction order from 12 months to 18 months, with an additional extension of 12 months possible through another ex parte application by the Public Prosecutor.

“Until the amendment is enforced, the current legal limit of 12 months remains in place,” he said.

Dzulkifli added that under current law, a restriction order will automatically lapse if prosecution is not initiated within the stipulated period.

He said further public discussion on Section 53, including the role of the Public Prosecutor, procedural safeguards and evidentiary standards, is crucial to ensure that the exercise of asset restriction powers is lawful and aligned with the principles of justice. - June 3, 2025

Spotlight

Malaysia

JPJ temporarily suspends VTA and registration for Chery Omoda 5

Malaysia

Eligibility for PTPTN repayment deferment to be verified with LHDN

Malaysia

Budget allocates two rounds of cash aid to millions of Malaysians in 70th Merdeka year

Malaysia

No Malaysians killed or injured in Riyadh airport attack, says Wisma Putra

Malaysia

JAIS probes viral religious ritual footage, says AI manipulation not ruled out

Malaysia

10-tonne truck ploughs into 11 vehicles: Police probe possible brake failure

World

Trump weighs joining Saudi strikes after deadly Houthi attack on Riyadh airport

You may be interested

Malaysia

Resident injured after crane topples onto nursing home

Malaysia

Minimum wage hike to RM2,000 from June 2027 to benefit 4 million workers

Malaysia

Working towards better transparency of government agencies

Malaysia

MACC warns data leaks could expose witnesses, derail corruption probes

Malaysia

Claims of a no-confidence vote against Negeri MB not true - Jalaluddin

Malaysia

JAIS probes viral religious ritual footage, says AI manipulation not ruled out

Malaysia

PM to announce latest on proposed Health Services Commission, says Dr Dzulkefly

Malaysia

10-tonne truck ploughs into 11 vehicles: Police probe possible brake failure