Malaysia

Prosecution: No complex legal issues in Muhyiddin’s sedition case

Affidavit argues legal questions raised can be dealt with at trial, as court sets August date for hearing application to refer case to apex court

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 04 Jun 2025 3:51PM

Prosecution: No complex legal issues in Muhyiddin’s sedition case
“The issue raised is a matter of defence,” DPP says - June 4, 2025

THE prosecution has opposed Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin’s application to refer legal questions surrounding the Sedition Act 1948 to the Federal Court, arguing that the case involves no complex or extraordinary legal matters.

In a sworn affidavit filed in response to the application, Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Razali Che Ani stated that the legal issues raised — including those relating to Article 43(2)(a) of the Federal Constitution and Sections 3(2) and 3(3) of the Sedition Act — have already been addressed in previous rulings by higher courts.

“The issue raised is a matter of defence,” Bernama cited Razali saying. “It can be argued by Muhyiddin during the trial and should be determined by the trial judge after hearing all prosecution witnesses.”

He also noted that the matter remains academic at this stage, as the trial has yet to begin and no evidence has been presented. Razali maintained that the prosecution is being conducted in line with constitutional principles and the norms of Malaysia’s criminal justice system.

“It is not in the interest of justice to refer this case to the Federal Court. Therefore, I request that the applicant’s notice of motion be dismissed,” the affidavit concluded.

High Court Judge Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin has fixed 28 August for the hearing of Muhyiddin’s application to refer the matter to the apex court. The date was set during case management attended by Muhyiddin’s counsel, Joshua Tay, and Razali representing the prosecution.

Muhyiddin, 77, filed the application on 4 April, seeking to challenge the constitutional validity of certain provisions in the Sedition Act 1948. He previously pleaded not guilty to making seditious remarks during a campaign speech on 14 August 2024 at Dewan Semai Bakti Felda Perasu, Nenggiri.

The former prime minister is alleged to have claimed he was not invited by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to be sworn in as Prime Minister following the 15th General Election, despite purportedly securing the support of 115 out of 222 MPs.

He faces charges under Section 4(1)(b) of the Sedition Act 1948, which carries a maximum sentence of three years’ imprisonment, a fine of up to RM5,000, or both, upon conviction. - June 4, 2025

Spotlight

Malaysia

Najib raises objections to 80% of ex-1MDB CEO’s witness statement over hearsay

Malaysia

Tun Dr Mahathir, Siti Hasmah create ASEAN record

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Nanta Linggi to leave Parliament after five terms, may contest new Sarawak state seat

World

Typhoon Dolphin’s remnants swamp Beijing as China braces for more extreme rainfall

Malaysia

Anwar expected to leave hospital today after successful treatment

Malaysia

Husband and wife face death penalty for drug trafficking

Malaysia

Former Subang MP, Wong Chen joins Bersama

Malaysia

Malaysian dies while transiting in Bangkok to Japan (video)

You may be interested

Malaysia

Nanta Linggi to leave Parliament after five terms, may contest new Sarawak state seat

Malaysia

Police investigate case of knife-wielding woman who damaged vehicle (video)

Malaysia

Rosmah granted conditional stay on RM67.5m jewellery payment

Malaysia

Immigration immediately stops issuing passports with validity periods exceeding 10 years

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Malaysia unveils RM4.3 billion renewable energy pipeline as ISES 2026 opens

Malaysia

Selangor yet to finalise funding for RM3 billion Shah Alam Stadium redevelopment

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Thai officer involved in mid-air disturbance on Malaysia-Bangkok flight (video)

Malaysia

HKHM 2026 sponsorship soars 118% to RM48.63 million