Malaysia

Prosecution: No complex legal issues in Muhyiddin’s sedition case

Affidavit argues legal questions raised can be dealt with at trial, as court sets August date for hearing application to refer case to apex court

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 04 Jun 2025 3:51PM

Prosecution: No complex legal issues in Muhyiddin’s sedition case
“The issue raised is a matter of defence,” DPP says - June 4, 2025

THE prosecution has opposed Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin’s application to refer legal questions surrounding the Sedition Act 1948 to the Federal Court, arguing that the case involves no complex or extraordinary legal matters.

In a sworn affidavit filed in response to the application, Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Razali Che Ani stated that the legal issues raised — including those relating to Article 43(2)(a) of the Federal Constitution and Sections 3(2) and 3(3) of the Sedition Act — have already been addressed in previous rulings by higher courts.

“The issue raised is a matter of defence,” Bernama cited Razali saying. “It can be argued by Muhyiddin during the trial and should be determined by the trial judge after hearing all prosecution witnesses.”

He also noted that the matter remains academic at this stage, as the trial has yet to begin and no evidence has been presented. Razali maintained that the prosecution is being conducted in line with constitutional principles and the norms of Malaysia’s criminal justice system.

“It is not in the interest of justice to refer this case to the Federal Court. Therefore, I request that the applicant’s notice of motion be dismissed,” the affidavit concluded.

High Court Judge Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin has fixed 28 August for the hearing of Muhyiddin’s application to refer the matter to the apex court. The date was set during case management attended by Muhyiddin’s counsel, Joshua Tay, and Razali representing the prosecution.

Muhyiddin, 77, filed the application on 4 April, seeking to challenge the constitutional validity of certain provisions in the Sedition Act 1948. He previously pleaded not guilty to making seditious remarks during a campaign speech on 14 August 2024 at Dewan Semai Bakti Felda Perasu, Nenggiri.

The former prime minister is alleged to have claimed he was not invited by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to be sworn in as Prime Minister following the 15th General Election, despite purportedly securing the support of 115 out of 222 MPs.

He faces charges under Section 4(1)(b) of the Sedition Act 1948, which carries a maximum sentence of three years’ imprisonment, a fine of up to RM5,000, or both, upon conviction. - June 4, 2025

Spotlight

Malaysia

Video of individuals, believed to be Rohingyas, sleeping in MRT goes viral

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Woman claims RM4 million condo transferred without consent after investment scheme collapse

Malaysia

Outstanding judgment paid to Teresa Kok, auction of Jamal's property called off

Malaysia

PH defers Johor MB post decision as Loke prioritises election victory

Events

International media networks need to be strengthened to face global challenges

By Ian McIntyre

Malaysia

Over 250 homes damaged in Bercham storm (video)

Malaysia

Johor state election: DAP bets on Malay candidate in Ulu Tiram

Opinion

ASEAN’s renaissance: A new lease of life in the multipolar world

You may be interested

Malaysia

City Hall cracks down on illegal street photographers, seizes 32 pieces of equipment in KL hotspots

Malaysia

Minor earthquake off Batu Pahat renews focus on Johor’s seismic activity

Malaysia

PH defers Johor MB post decision as Loke prioritises election victory

Malaysia

Acquisition of two gas blocks to Petronas an extraordinary development - PM

Malaysia

Outstanding judgment paid to Teresa Kok, auction of Jamal's property called off

Malaysia

Foreign nationals birth registrations exceed 60,000 since 2000 with no guarantee of citizenship

Malaysia

Jasin MP, wife involved in accident

Malaysia

Malaysia's positive diplomatic balancing act becomes its greatest economic advantage