Malaysia

Prosecution: No complex legal issues in Muhyiddin’s sedition case

Affidavit argues legal questions raised can be dealt with at trial, as court sets August date for hearing application to refer case to apex court

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 04 Jun 2025 3:51PM

Prosecution: No complex legal issues in Muhyiddin’s sedition case
“The issue raised is a matter of defence,” DPP says - June 4, 2025

THE prosecution has opposed Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin’s application to refer legal questions surrounding the Sedition Act 1948 to the Federal Court, arguing that the case involves no complex or extraordinary legal matters.

In a sworn affidavit filed in response to the application, Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Razali Che Ani stated that the legal issues raised — including those relating to Article 43(2)(a) of the Federal Constitution and Sections 3(2) and 3(3) of the Sedition Act — have already been addressed in previous rulings by higher courts.

“The issue raised is a matter of defence,” Bernama cited Razali saying. “It can be argued by Muhyiddin during the trial and should be determined by the trial judge after hearing all prosecution witnesses.”

He also noted that the matter remains academic at this stage, as the trial has yet to begin and no evidence has been presented. Razali maintained that the prosecution is being conducted in line with constitutional principles and the norms of Malaysia’s criminal justice system.

“It is not in the interest of justice to refer this case to the Federal Court. Therefore, I request that the applicant’s notice of motion be dismissed,” the affidavit concluded.

High Court Judge Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin has fixed 28 August for the hearing of Muhyiddin’s application to refer the matter to the apex court. The date was set during case management attended by Muhyiddin’s counsel, Joshua Tay, and Razali representing the prosecution.

Muhyiddin, 77, filed the application on 4 April, seeking to challenge the constitutional validity of certain provisions in the Sedition Act 1948. He previously pleaded not guilty to making seditious remarks during a campaign speech on 14 August 2024 at Dewan Semai Bakti Felda Perasu, Nenggiri.

The former prime minister is alleged to have claimed he was not invited by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to be sworn in as Prime Minister following the 15th General Election, despite purportedly securing the support of 115 out of 222 MPs.

He faces charges under Section 4(1)(b) of the Sedition Act 1948, which carries a maximum sentence of three years’ imprisonment, a fine of up to RM5,000, or both, upon conviction. - June 4, 2025

Spotlight

Malaysia

Tuanku Muhriz to focus on state affairs; Will not attend Conference of Rulers meeting

Malaysia

Sarawak projects record RM15.09b revenue, budgets RM10.1b for development in 2027

Malaysia

Sultan Nazrin: Delay in environmental action places future generations at risk

Malaysia

Woman allegedly raped at KL shopping centre after being threatened with intimate video

Malaysia

Jordan’s King confers highest civilian honour on Sultan Ibrahim

Malaysia

Driver monitoring aims to stop commercial vehicle crashes before they happen

Malaysia

KTMB heritage sites set for tourism makeover, says Loke

Malaysia

Zara Qairina’s mother: No doctors recorded injuries consistent with being beaten

You may be interested

Malaysia

Driver monitoring aims to stop commercial vehicle crashes before they happen

Malaysia

19-year-old charged with murdering student in Kuantan

Malaysia

JAIS probes viral religious ritual footage, says AI manipulation not ruled out

Malaysia

Negeri Ruler, Tuanku Muhriz, invited to Conference of Rulers meeting tomorrow

Malaysia

Selangor records moderate air quality, Johor extends school closures as haze persists

Malaysia

Rantau Panjang MP injured in accident

Malaysia

Express bus crashes into school surau at site of fatal SUV accident

Malaysia

MACC warns data leaks could expose witnesses, derail corruption probes