Malaysia

Yusoff Rawther acquitted under claims police failed to investigate entrapment allegation

High Court finds prosecution's case inadequate; accused’s fair trial rights deemed violated

Updated 11 months ago · Published on 12 Jun 2025 6:26PM

Yusoff Rawther acquitted under claims police failed to investigate entrapment allegation
The burden lay with the prosecution to examine whether the allegations in the two statements were true or false, Judge says - June 12, 2025

THE High Court has acquitted Muhammed Yusoff Rawther of drug trafficking and firearms-related charges, under a newly surfaced allegation that the police had failed to investigate his claim of entrapment and the prosecution’s inability to establish a prima facie case.

Delivering the ruling on Thursday, Justice Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin said the accused had alleged he was set up in two statements recorded shortly after his arrest, on 8 and 10 September 2024.

“The accused had stated his version that he had been entrapped, so the police had sufficient time to verify the matter,” the judge said.

“The burden lay with the prosecution to examine whether the allegations in the two statements were true or false. However, the failure of two police officers to investigate that version prejudiced the accused’s right to a fair trial.”

Although cannabis and imitation pistols were discovered in a car registered under Yusoff’s name — alongside his identification card, car keys, and remote — the court held that this did not conclusively establish exclusive control over the vehicle or its contents.

The judge further noted that Yusoff had been arrested outside the vehicle and that neither the key nor remote could open th driver’s side door.

“Based on these factors and the absence of further evidence, I find the accused did not have exclusive control over the prohibited items,” he said.

Yusoff, 32, was discharged and acquitted without being called to enter his defence.

He had faced two charges: trafficking 305 grams of cannabis and possession of two imitation firearms. The drug offence, allegedly committed outside the Kuala Lumpur police headquarters on 6 September 2024, was brought under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, which carries a mandatory life sentence and whipping.

The second charge, under Section 36(1) of the Arms Act 1960, pertained to the possession of imitation firearms near a condominium on Jalan Bukit Kiara earlier the same day. It carries a maximum penalty of one year’s imprisonment, a RM5,000 fine, or both.

The case was transferred to the High Court in November 2024. Yusoff was represented by counsel Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, while Deputy Public Prosecutor Mohd Sabri Othman led the prosecution. - June 12, 2025

Spotlight

Malaysia

Anwar congratulates Modi on becoming India's longest-serving elected PM

Malaysia

Missing jewellery: Rosmah ordered to pay RM67.5 million

People

Malay kampongs in Bangkok: Echoes of southern heritage in Thailand’s capital

Opinion

Johor MB’s exclusionary rhetoric betrays the people, exposes UMNO’s political hypocrisy

Malaysia

Johor and NS polls first major test of post PAS-Bersatu political order

Malaysia

Claimed installation of 12th N. Sembilan ruler invalid - Pengelola Bijaya Diraja

Malaysia

4WD driver who drove backwards on highway nabbed, positive for drugs (video)

By Ian McIntyre

Malaysia

Seven in ten Malaysian workers earn RM5k or less - economist

You may be interested

Malaysia

Court allows Daim's daughter to permanently keep passport

Malaysia

Woman molested on her way home from work (video)

Malaysia

4WD driver who drove backwards on highway nabbed, positive for drugs (video)

By Ian McIntyre

Malaysia

Firefighters rescue exhausted hiker after seven-kilometre trek on Gunung Chemerong

Malaysia

18 vehicles damaged after being hit by drug-positive driver

Malaysia

Economic strains from West Asia crisis must not fracture national unity, warns Fadillah

Malaysia

BN to contest solo in Negeri Sembilan state election - Ahmad Zahid

Malaysia

Ex-MACC chief Azam Baki files defamation suit against businessman Albert Tei