GEORGE TOWN – The Penang High Court will decide whether to allow amendments to the case relating to four state assemblymen who filed an originating summons against the Penang assembly from passing a motion to vacate their seats on October 6.
Judicial commissioner Azizan Md Arshad set the date after hearing oral submissions by both parties today over the assemblymen’s application to amend the summons.
“The decision will be delivered via email to both parties on October 6, with an e-review for further instructions about the originating summons, since both lawyers are based in Kuala Lumpur,” he said.
During the hearing, lawyer Datuk D. P. Naban, who represented the assemblymen, said the application was filed on grounds that the state’s anti-hopping law is not constitutional.
“It infringes on their freedom of speech because if they were to speak differently, they may be expelled by their party and have to vacate their seat under Article 14A(1) of the Penang constitution,” he said.
Meanwhile, lawyer Surendra Ananth, who is representing the Penang assembly and Speaker Datuk Law Choo Kiang, told the court that if the amendment to the originating summons was allowed, it would further delay the case and hearing.
He also said this was a tactical manoeuvre to delay the case.
In 2020, the four assemblymen – Zulkifli Ibrahim (Sg Acheh), Afif Bahardin (Seberang Jaya), Khaliq Mehtab Mohd Ishaq (Bertam), and Zolkifly Md Lazim (Telok Bahang) – had filed the originating summons against the two defendants to challenge the constitutionality of Article 14A(1) of the Penang constitution, and to stop the four seats concerned from being declared vacant, according to Article 14A(1).
Article 14A of the state constitution stipulates that an assemblyman should vacate his seat if he resigns, is stripped of his membership, ceases to be a politician, or is chosen as a candidate by another political party.
On April 12 this year, Azizan allowed the defendant/s application to refer questions to the Federal Court to hear and decide on the constitutionality of the state’s anti-hopping enactment.
The PSLA and its speaker wanted the Federal Court to decide on the question of whether Article 14A of the Penang constitution was void as it is inconsistent with Article 10 (1) (c) of the federal constitution.
The Federal Court, on August 3, ruled that Article 14A of the Penang constitution is valid and consistent with Article 10(1) (c) of the federal constitution. – Bernama, September 14, 2022
.jpeg)
