Opinion

Sabah’s 40% revenue share is not lost – Roger Chin

State would know best how to spend portion of its own revenue

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 26 Mar 2022 10:38PM

Sabah’s 40% revenue share is not lost – Roger Chin
Roger Chin says there is absolutely no reason why the original 40% revenue sharing formula cannot also be used as the basis to arrive at any reviews under Article 112D of the federal constitution. – Roger Chin Facebook pic, March 26, 2022

FINANCE Minister Datuk Seri Tengku Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz was recently reported as saying that the 40% revenue sharing formula with Sabah is no longer applicable following a new agreement between Sabah and the federal government reached in 1969.

Article 112D of the federal constitution states that there shall be a review of the special grants made to Sabah and Sarawak for five-year periods beginning 1969, 1974 and thereafter at such time as the government of the federation or the government of the state may require.

This first review under Article 112D was done pursuant to Sabah Special Grant (First Review) Order, 1970 (P.U. (A) 328/1970 dated August 18, 1970). The federal government and the Sabah government had then agreed that instead of the 40% grant, another grant be made as follows:

i. 1969 – RM20 million

ii. 1970 – RM21.5 million

iii. 1971 – RM23.1 million

iv. 1972 – RM24.8 million

v. 1973 – RM26.7 million

The period of this new grant was specifically stated to be from January 1, 1969 to January 1, 1974.

Since then, there have been no further reviews covering the period from 1974 to the present, notwithstanding that Article 112D specifically provides for a second review to be done for the next five-year period beginning 1974. The review is now overdue by 48 years.

Article 112D makes it very clear that reviews are to be conducted between the federal government and the Sabah state government jointly and never unilaterally. If on any review the federal government and the Sabah state government are unable to reach agreement on any matter, it would be referred to an independent assessor, and his recommendations shall be binding on the governments concerned and shall be given effect as if they were the agreement of those governments.

As reviews are to be mutually agreed upon, there is absolutely no reason why the original 40% revenue sharing formula cannot also be used as the basis to arrive at any reviews under Article 112D of the federal constitution. This is especially so when one is reminded of the original reason why Sabah and Sarawak are allocated special revenues to meet their needs above and beyond what other states receive – to assist in the quicker infrastructure and economic development of Sabah and Sarawak.

It is misplaced for the federal minister to imply that any review under Article 112D must only take into account the financial position of the federal government, as well as the needs of the state. Such considerations are merely also to be taken into account amongst others in a review negotiation between parties.

Indeed, if the federal government is sincere in its continued representation that it is committed to increase the special grant given to Sabah especially when it was constitutionally mandated for the second review to be made in 1974 but never done, a good start would be for review to be negotiated retrospectively from 1974 and/or prospectively from the present as the case may be with the original 40% sharing as the starting point and not with threats that this original formula is no longer applicable.

At this juncture, it is important to emphasise that the federal government must be transparent in making information available to the Sabah state government in order for all factors to be considered in order to arrive at an informed review decision which does take into account all considerations. The 1969 review was only made possible as information was made available then to the Sabah state government to show that the amounts in the review amounted to approximately 40% of the revenue collected from Sabah then as well as the projected growth of such share in the ensuing years in the five-year period.

There can be no doubt that the infrastructure and economic development of Sabah is not on par with that of Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah is the best party to decide on how to spend a portion of its own revenue which would only ensure faster and accurate decisions on expenditure, being well aware of the needs and actual scenario on the ground. Certainly, this must be the true intention of revenue sharing as encapsulated in Article 112C of the federal constitution providing for special grants and assignments of revenue to states of Sabah and Sarawak. – The Vibes, March 26, 2022

Roger Chin is the president of the Sabah Law Society

Related News

Malaysia / 1d

Sabah does not agree to 200-litre diesel quota, forms special committee - Masidi

Malaysia / 1mth

Tsunami alert: Stay calm and obey instructions from the authorities – Hajiji (video)

Malaysia / 1mth

Sabah embarks on five-year initiative to document multiethnic heritage - Hajiji

Malaysia / 1mth

Anwar - Sabah's special grant interim payment increased from RM600m to RM1.5b

Malaysia / 1mth

Anwar to clarify Sabah 40 pct entitlement talks tomorrow

Malaysia / 1mth

Sabah: GRS confident government will agree to review revenue entitlement rate 

Spotlight

Malaysia

Anwar, Zahid project unity at Putrajaya amid PH-BN differences during state polls

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Police looking for two robbery suspects who kicked elderly woman (video)

Malaysia

Malaysia will not bow to US congressional pressure over Israeli nationals’ issue - Loke (UPDATED)

Malaysia

Deaf e-hailing driver sues government, police over alleged assault, seeks disability access reforms

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Johor appoints 10 deputy exco to strengthen administration

Malaysia

Suspended police corporal charged with sexual assault of 11-year-old daughter

Malaysia

Magnitude 5.7 earthquake off northern Sumatra felt across west coast of Peninsular Malaysia

World

Trump approves potential US-Saudi nuclear deal allowing uranium enrichment capability

Malaysia

Network School moves to Kazakhstan

You may be interested

Opinion

Orang Asli in Pahang: Token gestures or genuine recognition?

Opinion

BN, you can’t have your cake and eat it too

By The Vibes Says