Opinion

Anti-party hopping bill: delays concerning, govt should involve civil society in deliberations – Ideas

Excluding party-hopping from freedom of association could lead to further exemptions, jeopardise citizens’ rights

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 10 Apr 2022 12:00PM

Anti-party hopping bill: delays concerning, govt should involve civil society in deliberations – Ideas
On an issue as crucial and divisive as party-hopping, MPs should have the freedom to express their concerns and engage in meaningful debates in Parliament, where their views will be recorded and made public. This is important to ensure trust in our democratic institutions, says the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs. – The Vibes file pic, April 10, 2022

THE Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (Ideas) is concerned that there will be further delay in tabling the anti-party hopping bill. 

Considering that the bill was one of the key components of the memorandum of understanding (MoU) between the government and opposition, more serious and urgent efforts should have been made to obtain bipartisan support and for the tabling of the bill during the last parliamentary session in order to meet the stipulated deadline.

Now that the delay is confirmed, Ideas hopes that the government uses this opportunity to include think-tanks and civil society organisations in its consultations. Time should be taken to carefully consider existing concerns that have been widely expressed. 

We call on the government to immediately conduct meaningful and thorough deliberation on the draft bill in order to ensure that all potential gaps are addressed before tabling a flawed bill that may have counterproductive effects on democracy.

Our concern remains to be on the definition of “hopping”, which we believe is similar to the concern some MPs have as well. In a matter of national importance such as party-hopping, it is crucial that the deliberative process is as inclusive as possible. 

Since the sitting tomorrow will be used solely to amend Article 10 of the federal constitution, Ideas is concerned that the exemption made to exclude party-hopping from freedom of association could potentially open the floodgates to more exemptions in the future, thus jeopardising the fundamental freedom of Malaysians to form, join and disband associations as they please. 

We hope the MPs will bear this in mind as they vote tomorrow.

Lastly, we echo Prof Wong Chin Huat’s suggestion that “the bill should be put on a conscience vote, not only as a package at the second and third readings but also on each of its clauses in the committee stage”.

On an issue as crucial and divisive as party-hopping, MPs should have the freedom to express their concerns and engage in meaningful debates in Parliament, where their views will be recorded and made public. This is important to ensure trust in our democratic institutions. – The Vibes, April 10, 2022

Ideas is a nonprofit research institute dedicated to promoting solutions to public policy challenges

Related News

Malaysia / 1y

Increased tariffs will strain Malaysia-US ties, disrupt trade links

Malaysia / 1y

IDEAS: Appointments to public bodies must not be normalised as political rewards

Opinion / 1y

Missed opportunities for Orang Asli education in Budget 2025

Opinion / 3y

Towards a law on allocating constituency development funds – Ideas

Opinion / 3y

Study finds almost zero communication to local communities affected by mega-projects: Ideas 

Malaysia / 3y

Use PSCs in appointment processes, ensure transparency: Ideas

Spotlight

Malaysia

Haze: Schools in Johor, Melaka, and Negeri Sembilan to close tomorrow

Malaysia

Tun Mahathir’s health improves, but not ready to leave hospital

Malaysia

LPT3 row puts Kelantan’s infrastructure priorities under scrutiny

Malaysia

Terengganu royal family member sues two banks over RM1.99m missing from savings

Malaysia

Irene Sofiya murder probe referred to Johor prosecutors for review

Malaysia

Teacher denies negligence charges over fatal school SUV crash in Kota Bharu

Malaysia

Sulaiman Md Ali opts out of Melaka polls, will not defend Lendu

You may be interested

Opinion

Budget 2027: Making 2027 the year of Malaysian MSMEs through purpose-driven governance

Opinion

The Malaysia Agreement 1963: Grievances and expectations in Sabah and Sarawak