World

New Mexico lawyer fined US$5,000 for filing AI-fabricated witness evidence

The court flings include testimony from witnesses who did not exist, in a murder conviction appeal

Updated 1 month ago · Published on 12 Sep 2026 5:34PM

New Mexico lawyer fined US$5,000 for filing AI-fabricated witness evidence
A New Mexico lawyer has been fined US$5,000 after admitting he used ChatGPT to prepare court documents containing fabricated police and witness evidence - September 12, 2026

A NEW Mexico lawyer has been fined US$5,000 after filing court documents containing fabricated police and witness evidence generated with the help of ChatGPT in an appeal against a murder conviction.

The New Mexico Supreme Court in Santa Fe found lawyer Stephen Aarons in contempt of court on Wednesday for failing to verify the documents he submitted in the criminal appeal.

Aarons admitted that he prepared the filings with assistance from an artificial intelligence (AI) programme, with the court finding that they included false testimony attributed to witnesses who were entirely fabricated.

The judges said Aarons “showed no remorse and did not care about his client”.

The court fined him US$5,000 (RM203,515) and said the matter would be referred to the state bar disciplinary board for further investigation.

Aarons, a private defence lawyer based in Santa Fe, told Reuters that he had used ChatGPT to summarise trial proceedings after agreeing last year to handle the defendant’s appeal.

He said he had not understood the extent to which AI could invent facts.

“I regret it but hope the disciplinary board will take into consideration that it was a mistake.

“This is a lesson for professionals who rely on technology,” he said.

OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment.

Aarons represented Oscar Renee Sandoval, who had pleaded not guilty to murdering the mother of his children before being convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment last year.

Sandoval’s appeal remains pending and was transferred on Sept 2 to another New Mexico defence lawyer, Kim Chavez Cook, who declined to comment.

The case highlights growing concerns over lawyers relying on AI-generated legal material without independently checking its accuracy.

Judges in state and federal courts have increasingly sanctioned lawyers for submitting AI-generated filings containing fabricated case citations or inaccurate legal references.

But the Aarons case is more serious because the disputed filing included fabricated witness testimony in a criminal appeal. - September 12, 2026

Spotlight

Malaysia

Mahathir’s RM150m defamation suit against Anwar faces uncertainty

Malaysia

Son shocked by father’s fatal hacking in FELDA settlement

Malaysia

Election Commission to meet on Nov 6 to set key dates for Sarawak polls

Malaysia

PH says final 72 hours could decide Melaka election outcome despite 70-80% target

Malaysia

RM3.28m Govt aid reaches 164 Indian community places of worship

Malaysia

Ismail Lasim holds off on new Negeri Sembilan exco appointments pending court decision

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Battersea project’s high upfront cost led to losses for Malaysian investors, says Anwar

Malaysia

Ras Adiba condemns unauthorised entry into missing TV host Zalina Azman’s home

You may be interested

World

Trump invokes 9/11 attacks to portray Muslim Senate candidate El-Sayed as extremist

World

Fifteen-year-old Florida teen to be tried as adult over shooting that wounded 11

World

AI-driven cyber threats surge as Australia reports 80% rise in security warnings

World

Lula stages dramatic comeback to win fourth Brazilian presidential term

World

Europe’s Gen Z protests expose growing anger over housing, education and cost of living

World

Former Japanese prime minister Yasuo Fukuda dies at 90

World

Houthis claim fresh missile strikes on Riyadh airport hours after flights resume

World

Israel expands ‘ethnic cleansing’ campaign to Hebron