Business

Friction remains a year into N. America trade deal

Many disputes see US objecting to Mexican or Canadian practices

Updated 5 years ago · Published on 27 Jun 2021 2:00PM

Friction remains a year into N. America trade deal
The US trade representative’s office has set up a dispute settlement panel under USMCA to examine the issue of milk quotas imposed by Canada, much to its dismay. – Pixabay pic, June 27, 2021

WASHINGTON – One year after it took effect in the midst of a record economic downturn, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) has yet to end the trading friction between the North American allies.

The three countries said the new treaty will benefit their economies and workers, but as the anniversary nears on Thursday, the neighbours have already entered into a range of disputes – many of which have seen the US objecting to Mexican or Canadian practices.

“Most of the focus on USMCA over the next several years is going to be on the disputes,” said Edward Alden, an expert in the Foreign Relations Council.

USMCA replaces the North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta), which had been in force since 1994, and which Alden said envisions the continent’s three economies at one point becoming a single market, like the European Union.

That vision appears to be dead, at least for now.

“USMCA is very much the rules for three separate North American economies to cooperate where they can, and rules for fighting where they can’t cooperate,” said Alden.

While the disputes between the countries have made headlines, Jeffrey Schott, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, credited the deal with “removing the cloud of uncertainty” over continental commerce.

“That creates a better atmosphere for trade and investment than we’ve had in some time."

Former US president Donald Trump, known for his bellicose rhetoric even towards American allies, negotiated USMCA, but his successor Joe Biden could change policies.

However, there are also signs that even under a new government, the squabbling will continue.

Ready to fight

Canada is perhaps Washington’s closest ally, but when it comes to trade, the neighbours have several differences.

The US has long-running disputes over the Canadian dairy and softwood lumber industries, and has also taken issue with Ottawa’s solar panel exports and the taxation of American tech firms.

US Trade Representative Katherine Tai has said she will defend the country’s interests, starting with dairy farmers.

Her office has set up a dispute settlement panel under USMCA to examine the issue of milk quotas imposed by Canada, much to its dismay.

Francois Dumontier, a spokesman for a group representing Quebec milk producers, said USMCA provides “no advantage”.

He also called some provisions an “attack on Canadian sovereignty” because they restrict Canadian exports while allowing more imports from the US.

After the pandemic

On the other side of the border, David Salmonsen, senior director of congressional relations at the American Farm Bureau Federation, pointed to a long list of trade disputes, but said he is overall optimistic.

“I think we’ll get a better picture once everybody’s economies are recovering from the pandemic.

“We supported the agreement, and we think it’ll work to keep agricultural trade moving and growing between all three nations.”

Ottawa, however, has called for its own dispute settlement panel over Washington’s 18% tariffs on solar panels made in Canada.

Despite the skirmishes, Valeria Moy, general director of the Mexican Institute for Competitiveness, said over the past year, there has been “no radical change compared to Nafta”.

But, she expects USMCA could have an agreement on labour legislation in Mexico in the future.

Washington has already invoked USMCA twice to ask Mexico City to investigate violations of union rights in the automotive sector, notably at a General Motors plant.

“Will this have a beneficial effect on Mexican workers? It seems to me that it will,” said Moy.

“It will force Mexican companies to make changes.”

But, she warned that the US may end up using the labour issue “as a pretext to apply protectionist measures”. – AFP, June 27, 2021

Related News

Opinion / 1mth

Andy Burnham and a new Britain: Why we  should pay attention

World / 4mth

New Mexico jury finds Meta liable for endangering children

Business / 5mth

US investigates manufacturing overcapacity in 15 economies, including Malaysia, EU

Malaysia / 6mth

Singapore PM Lawrence Wong arrives in Malaysia for a special visit

Opinion / 6mth

Bridging civilisations: Why India matters to Malaysia’s economic future

Malaysia / 6mth

India, Malaysia will discuss trade pact review during Modi's visit

Spotlight

World

Series of explosions, fires hit three southern Thai provinces

Opinion

One more temple falls: The destruction of Malaysia’s soul?

Opinion

Why is Israel pushing toward confrontation with Türkiye?

Malaysia

‘Uncle Anwar’ sends representative to children’s entrepreneurs day in Subang Jaya

Malaysia

‘Look at temple dispute based on facts and laws’ – DAP reps tell Rayer

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Malaysia, Brunei set deadline to demarcate boundary, enhance border security

Malaysia

Police probe indecent act allegedly targeting woman in Sungai Petani

Malaysia

Sarawak postpones three major programmes over haze concerns

You may be interested

Business

K8 cargo: Businessman seeks clarification from MOF, Customs, Petronas

Business

Govt rules out RM7.5b Datasonic takeover amid identity security concerns

Business

Oil prices pull back after rally as markets brace for tougher Iran sanctions

Business

Nation’s economic outlook strengthens as leading index signals continued growth