Education

Proposal to classify subsidies based on family income is regressive, says MCA youth

MCA youth said the proposal requires thorough guidelines on its implementation to prevent unnecessary conflicts and controversies.

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 02 Oct 2024 9:55AM

Proposal to classify subsidies based on family income is regressive, says MCA youth
Saw said the essence of education should aim to bridge disparities among students. - October 2, 2024

THE proposal to cut education subsidies for wealthy children in Budget 2025 to assist poorer groups appears reasonable as it shows the government’s efforts to ensure targeted subsidies reach those genuinely in need. 

However, MCA youth today said the proposal requires thorough guidelines on its implementation to prevent unnecessary conflicts and controversies.

Its secretary-general Saw Yee Fung said the current education system does not categorise schools based on household income. 

“Concerns grow as to how Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim intends to define and execute the subsidy withdrawal for families determined to be “ultra rich.” 

“How will the government identify which families are "ultra-rich" to revoke their subsidies?,” she asked.

She said the essence of education should aim to bridge disparities among students. 

Since 2018, she said the Ministry of Education has moved away from classifying students based on grades, to prevent children from being labelled from an early age. 

“Hence, the premier’s proposal to classify subsidies based on family income is regressive. 

“Using income to categorise students creates divisions between the 'wealthy' and the 'poor,' which contradicts the spirit and essence of education,”.

While acknowledging the government's aspiration to assist vulnerable groups, Saw said the lack of details in yesterday’s announcement might foster resentment and 'class envy' sentiments. 

She said this could exacerbate social tensions and contravene the principle of education enabling inclusiveness. 

“We understand the government's challenges on financial allocation, but we must avoid adopting any anti-wealth sentiments in official discourse or policies. 

“Such attitudes can skewer society’s view of wealth as a 'crime,' ultimately undermining social cohesion in the long run. 

“The government wields a duty to promote fairness and justice, not to create new conflicts in society,” she added. - October 2, 2024

Related News

Opinion / 2w

Why Bersama is not Malaysia’s best hope

Malaysia / 1mth

PM Anwar dismisses talk of fuel price hikes

Opinion / 1mth

Should petrol subsidies be removed and the savings redistributed to the poor?

Malaysia / 1mth

What matters: Policies that truly understand the rakyat

Malaysia / 1mth

Gawai, Kaamatan flight tickets fixed at RM499, government to bear subsidy – Anthony Loke

Malaysia / 1mth

Keeping fuel affordable in uncertain times

Spotlight

Malaysia

After Johor, the uncomfortable question for Anwar’s critics: Were we too impatient?

By The Vibes Says

Malaysia

Network School's business licences revoked, to cease operations tomorrow

Opinion

Orang Asli in Pahang: Token gestures or genuine recognition?

Malaysia

Tuition teacher sentenced to 105 years in prison and 70 lashes for raping daughter

Malaysia

Azam Baki denies involvement in RM178.29 million contract linked to brother’s company

Malaysia

Aminuddin urges NS voters to weigh manifesto promising benefits for M40 and B40 groups

Malaysia

No need to resign, PM has absolute power if there is doubt – Ahmad Zahid

World

Gaza’s water crisis deepens as families face thirst, disease and collapsing sanitation systems

You may be interested

Education

Groundbreaking for new Tamil school in Ladang Labu marks milestone for MVV City