Malaysia

Bar fails in bid to challenge Zahid DNAA

High Court orders plaintiff to pay RM10,000 in costs to the attorney-general.

Updated 2 years ago · Published on 27 Jun 2024 12:47PM

Bar fails in bid to challenge Zahid DNAA
The Malaysian Bar has failed to initiate a judicial review to challenge Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi's discharge not amounting to an acquittal in the Yayasan Akal Budi corruption case. – Wikipedia pic, June 27, 2024.

THE Malaysian Bar failed to initiate a judicial review to challenge Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi's discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) in the Yayasan Akal Budi corruption case.

The decision was delivered by High Court judge Datuk Amarjeet Singh Serjit Singh, who held that the Bar did not fulfil the threshold requirement under Section 96 of the Courts of Judicature Act (CJA) for a judicial review. 

The Bar Council, in an application filed on December 2 last year, named the attorney-general (AG) and the deputy prime minister as respondents in its application for the DNAA to be rescinded.

The Bar said the AG’s decision was “unreasonable and tainted with irrationality”, and sought a mandamus order to compel the AG to disclose all information it had relied on and the basis of his decision to seek the conditional discharge.

The Kuala Lumpur High Court also dismissed the Bar's application, filed under Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution, read with Section 84 of the CJA, to refer several constitutional questions to the apex court for determination.

Senior federal counsels Ahmad Hanir Hambaly and Shamsul Bolhassan appeared for the AGC while Datuk Hisyam Teh Poh Teik, Hamidi Mohd Noh and Guok Ngek Seong represented Zahid.

Former Malaysian Bar president Steven Thiru and Abhilaash Subramaniam were the lawyers for the Malaysian Bar.

Amarjeet ordered the Bar to pay RM10,000 in costs to the AG, who is one of the respondents named in the case. The other respondent is Zahid.

In September last year, Zahid was granted a DNAA on all 47 of his corruption, criminal breach of trust and money-laundering charges.

The Kuala Lumpur High Court granted the DNAA sought by deputy public prosecutor Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar.

When a court grants a DNAA, it means that the accused is discharged from the current charges without being acquitted of them.

The case is put on hold or suspended, but the prosecution has the option to refile the charges or reinstate the case at a later time if new evidence or circumstances warrant it. – June 27, 2024

Spotlight

Malaysia

Anwar: Children’s smiles, dreams are Malaysia’s future (video)

Heritage

Penang first state to recognise Hungry Ghost Festival, cemeteries as heritage

Malaysia

Child malnutrition needs urgent action, says Charles Santiago

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Zahid: Umno, BN favour earlier GE16

World

Trump floats renaming Strait Of Hormuz ‘Trump Strait’ amid Iran conflict

Malaysia

Weak earthquake measuring 3.4 magnitude detected in Keningau

Malaysia

Stepfather held over alleged rape, sexual assault of 13-year-old in Besut

Malaysia

Toying with danger: Police tracking owner of MPV

You may be interested

Malaysia

Serian air pollution hits hazardous level with API reading of 495

Malaysia

Weak earthquake measuring 3.4 magnitude detected in Keningau

Malaysia

RM25.3m paid into Bersatu accounts after Jana Wibawa projects, court told

Malaysia

Penang secures more than RM17b investments for first half of 2026

By Ian McIntyre

Malaysia

Six Malaysians held over RM45 million drug haul linked to co-pilot

Malaysia

Akmal Saleh attends PAS Youth muktamar

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Woman dies after alleged assault, boyfriend held in Penampang

Malaysia

Zahid: Umno, BN favour earlier GE16