Malaysia

Zayn Rayyan case: ‘Neglect’ in charge does not meet WHO or APA definition, court told

Child psychologist tells court that alleged act by mother fails to meet professional standards for child neglect

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 04 Aug 2025 3:26PM

Zayn Rayyan case: ‘Neglect’ in charge does not meet WHO or APA definition, court told
Expert testifies the term “neglect” was not explicitly mentioned in either the police report or the post-mortem findings relating to the six-year-old child - August 4, 2025

THE term “neglect” used in the charge against the mother of the late Zayn Rayyan does not align with the definitions set out by the American Psychological Association (APA) and the World Health Organization (WHO), the Sessions Court heard today.

Dr Noor Aishah Rosli, a child psychology expert and the fifth defence witness in the trial of Ismanira Abdul Manaf, testified that the alleged conduct did not fulfil key professional criteria that define child neglect.

According to Dr Noor Aishah, neglect must involve consistent and prolonged failure in four main areas: emotional care, physical care, education, and provision of basic needs.

“Neglect cannot be determined based on a single incident or isolated act,” she told the court during the defence proceedings before Judge Dr Syahliza Warnoh.

The expert was responding to the amended charge against Ismanira, which accuses her of neglecting her son in a manner that could have caused physical injury. However, Dr Noor Aishah highlighted the use of the word “could” in the charge, describing it as indicating uncertainty in terms of the impact of the alleged act.

She further pointed out that the term “neglect” was not explicitly mentioned in either the police report or the post-mortem findings relating to the six-year-old child.

The trial is scheduled to resume at 2pm today.

According to the amended charge, Ismanira—who had custody of Zayn Rayyan—is accused of neglecting the boy in a way that may have caused physical harm between 12 noon on 5 December 2023 and 9.55pm the following day. The alleged offence is said to have occurred between Block R of the Idaman Apartments in Damansara Damai and a nearby stream.

The charge falls under Section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment, a fine not exceeding RM50,000, or both, upon conviction. - August 4, 2025

Spotlight

Malaysia

Singapore could bar under-18s from social media platforms that fail safety test

Malaysia

College student dies after falling from 22nd-floor condominium in Setapak

Malaysia

PM praised for ‘Medeka Day’ reforms; More needed to cope with rising costs – Guan Eng

By Ian McIntyre

World

Tupac Shakur murder case ends after 30 years as ex-gang leader found guilty

Malaysia

Unidentified man found dead in Sungai Buloh drain as police probe suspected murder

Malaysia

Four killed, four injured in 11-vehicle Pahang highway crash

Malaysia

Sarawak haze crisis deepens as five areas hit hazardous air quality

Opinion

Would the United States use nuclear weapons against Iran?

Malaysia

Tajikistan eyes bigger role for Malaysia in Central Asian market

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

You may be interested

Malaysia

Rosmah Mansor’s RM970m solar corruption appeal finally set for hearing

Malaysia

Cloud seeding to target Sarawak haze and water shortages from Sept 3

Malaysia

MACC arrests former minister over Tabung Haji RCI probe

Malaysia

Tun M not automatically invited to National Day Celebrations, Secretariat says

Malaysia

Mahathir turns up for National Day celebrations in Putrajaya

Malaysia

BN faces Melaka test: Can it deliver another state victory?

Malaysia

Woman pleads guilty to selling baby for RM17,300 in Kedah

Malaysia

Luxury MPV used to pick Myanmar migrants after border entry