Malaysia

Zayn Rayyan case: ‘Neglect’ in charge does not meet WHO or APA definition, court told

Child psychologist tells court that alleged act by mother fails to meet professional standards for child neglect

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 04 Aug 2025 3:26PM

Zayn Rayyan case: ‘Neglect’ in charge does not meet WHO or APA definition, court told
Expert testifies the term “neglect” was not explicitly mentioned in either the police report or the post-mortem findings relating to the six-year-old child - August 4, 2025

THE term “neglect” used in the charge against the mother of the late Zayn Rayyan does not align with the definitions set out by the American Psychological Association (APA) and the World Health Organization (WHO), the Sessions Court heard today.

Dr Noor Aishah Rosli, a child psychology expert and the fifth defence witness in the trial of Ismanira Abdul Manaf, testified that the alleged conduct did not fulfil key professional criteria that define child neglect.

According to Dr Noor Aishah, neglect must involve consistent and prolonged failure in four main areas: emotional care, physical care, education, and provision of basic needs.

“Neglect cannot be determined based on a single incident or isolated act,” she told the court during the defence proceedings before Judge Dr Syahliza Warnoh.

The expert was responding to the amended charge against Ismanira, which accuses her of neglecting her son in a manner that could have caused physical injury. However, Dr Noor Aishah highlighted the use of the word “could” in the charge, describing it as indicating uncertainty in terms of the impact of the alleged act.

She further pointed out that the term “neglect” was not explicitly mentioned in either the police report or the post-mortem findings relating to the six-year-old child.

The trial is scheduled to resume at 2pm today.

According to the amended charge, Ismanira—who had custody of Zayn Rayyan—is accused of neglecting the boy in a way that may have caused physical harm between 12 noon on 5 December 2023 and 9.55pm the following day. The alleged offence is said to have occurred between Block R of the Idaman Apartments in Damansara Damai and a nearby stream.

The charge falls under Section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment, a fine not exceeding RM50,000, or both, upon conviction. - August 4, 2025

Spotlight

Malaysia

Papagomo acquitted for second time in sedition case over government, Israel claims

Malaysia

ECRL fares start at RM60, with 50% discounts for children, seniors and OKU

Malaysia

DKU seeks court action against Ismail, 16 others over Negeri Sembilan royal dispute

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Kampung Manis: Dreams of 227 families to own replacement homes draw closer

Malaysia

Fadhlina takes legal action over video of 2023 Parliament speech

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Civil servants urged to turn Selangor Sultan’s anti-graft message into action

Malaysia

Animal welfare group urges probe into alleged sexual abuse of cat in viral video

Malaysia

Macron appeals for calm after France riots: 2,400 arrested, nearly 1,000 officers injured

Malaysia

Malaysia renews offer to help Indonesia fight fires

You may be interested

Malaysia

Online scam call centres: Police detain 31 people targeting foreign victims in Pahang crackdown

Malaysia

Macron appeals for calm after France riots: 2,400 arrested, nearly 1,000 officers injured

Malaysia

UM student defends her position, does not see any need to apologise

Malaysia

Anwar to face Dewan Rakyat questions on corporate mafia claims, FELDA probes

Malaysia

Property agent loses over RM79k after being scammed twice

Malaysia

Hajiji urges GRS leaders to put Sabah first, warns against infighting

Malaysia

Malaysia renews offer to help Indonesia fight fires

Malaysia

Malaysia must win trust of both sides to move Southern Thailand peace process forward