Malaysia

High Court to decide if Bar Council’s challenge over Zahid's NFA should proceed

The Court will decide on 30 June whether the Bar’s bid to challenge the Attorney General’s Chambers’ decision to classify Zahid’s Yayasan Akalbudi corruption case

Updated 4 months ago · Published on 21 May 2026 5:47PM

High Court to decide if Bar Council’s challenge over Zahid's NFA should proceed
The decision lies with whether “No Further Action” should proceed immediately or be put on hold pending appeals before the Federal Court - May 21, 2026

THE Attorney General’s Chambers has formally objected to the Malaysian Bar’s application seeking leave to commence judicial review proceedings against the decision to classify Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’s Yayasan Akalbudi corruption case as “no further action” (NFA).

Senior Federal Counsel Nurhafizza Azizan, appearing for the Attorney General’s Chambers, informed the High Court during case management proceedings before Judge Alice Loke Yee Ching that the government would oppose the application.

The Malaysian Bar, which filed the judicial review application naming the Attorney General and Ahmad Zahid as respondents, is seeking declarations that the decision made on 8 January was unlawful, null and void, and that the Attorney General had acted beyond his legal powers in ordering the NFA classification.

Earlier this year, the Attorney General’s Chambers announced that no further action would be taken against Ahmad Zahid over 47 charges involving criminal breach of trust, corruption and money laundering linked to Yayasan Akalbudi after reviewing the entirety of the evidence and newly obtained materials.

In its earlier statement, the AGC said the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission had conducted further detailed investigations, including into the source of funds, methods of acquisition and the use of the foundation’s funds.

Meanwhile, Nurhafizza told the court that the AGC would be filing an application for leave to appeal at the Federal Court against the Court of Appeal’s 7 May ruling, which allowed the Malaysian Bar’s appeal concerning the prosecution’s earlier decision to discontinue proceedings against Ahmad Zahid.

The Court of Appeal had ordered the matter to be returned to the High Court for substantive judicial review proceedings.

Counsel Mohamed Shahrul Fazli Kamarulzaman, appearing for Ahmad Zahid, said his client would also be filing a similar application before the Federal Court.

“Therefore, we seek for these judicial review proceedings (concerning the NFA) to be stayed until the parties return to court with an update on the status of the Federal Court proceedings,” Bernama reported him saying.

The High Court subsequently fixed 30 June to determine whether the Malaysian Bar’s leave application should proceed or remain suspended pending the disposal of the Federal Court appeals. - May 21, 2026

Spotlight

Malaysia

Nhaveen murder trial: Accused admits taunting victim but denies fatal assault

Malaysia

MCMC probes alleged AI sexual abuse targeting Kedah pupils, teachers

Malaysia

Anwar checks final preparations for Budget 2027

Malaysia

Sarawak election could be called within weeks of Budget 2027

Malaysia

Anwar contacts Prabowo over ‘alarming’ transboundary haze

Malaysia

King calls for schools in haze-hit areas to close

Malaysia

Parents worry over children’s exposure as haze worsens

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

You may be interested

Malaysia

Man with 16 previous criminal records shot in head after alleged attempt to flee Johor police

Malaysia

Budget 2027: TNB to invest RM15b to strengthen national power grid

Malaysia

Speaker congratulates Muar MP as he rushes off after Budget presentation

Malaysia

Budget 2027: SARA, STR aid raised to RM16bil for 2027

Malaysia

Anwar contacts Prabowo over ‘alarming’ transboundary haze

Malaysia

Budget 2027: Anwar to chart path towards stronger growth, better jobs and higher living standards

Malaysia

Police probe yet another alleged assault of 14-year-old by senior in school dorm

Malaysia

Malaysia remains at Tier 2 in US human trafficking report for third consecutive year