World

Federal Judge signals likely dismissal of xAI trade secret lawsuit against OpenAI

District Judge Rita Lin issues a four-page filing outlining her tentative view to grant OpenAI’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit ahead of formal oral arguments scheduled for February 3

Updated 8 months ago · Published on 31 Jan 2026 10:17AM

Federal Judge signals likely dismissal of xAI trade secret lawsuit against OpenAI
Current complaint failed to establish a direct link between the hiring of former Musk employees and the misappropriation of intellectual property - January 31, 2026

THE legal battle between Elon Musk and Sam Altman faced a significant setback as a San Francisco judge indicated her inclination to dismiss xAI’s allegations of trade secret theft against OpenAI, citing a lack of plausible evidence that the ChatGPT creator improperly acquired or utilised confidential source code.

Reuter cited today that U.S. District Judge Rita Lin issued a four-page filing outlining her tentative view to grant OpenAI’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit ahead of formal oral arguments scheduled for February 3.

While the judge suggested that xAI might be granted leave to amend its claims should the dismissal be finalised, she noted that the current complaint failed to establish a direct link between the hiring of former Musk employees and the misappropriation of intellectual property.

The litigation, initiated by Musk’s startup in September, alleged that OpenAI had engaged in predatory hiring practices to secure proprietary information related to the artificial intelligence chatbot Grok.

According to the court filing, Lin observed that Musk’s startup did not plausibly allege that OpenAI acquired or encouraged the theft of trade secrets, despite allegations that some former xAI employees downloaded source code before leaving.

The judge further remarked that it was not plausible to infer from xAI’s complaint that OpenAI used xAI’s trade secrets, or the former xAI employees used them on the job after joining OpenAI.

This assessment extends to the unfair competition claims brought by xAI, with the judge noting that the poaching allegations all focus on poaching in service of acquiring xAI’s trade secrets and do not identify any other reason why the hiring of those employees was anticompetitive.

OpenAI has consistently maintained that the legal action is part of a broader campaign to harass a competitor with unfounded legal claims, suggesting that the motive stems from xAI’s inability to keep pace with the market dominance of ChatGPT.

Legal representatives for both tech entities remained unavailable for immediate comment following the judge’s preliminary findings.

This case represents one of several high-stakes legal confrontations between Musk and the company he helped co-found.

The billionaire is currently pursuing separate litigation regarding OpenAI’s transition to a for-profit model, seeking damages that could reach 134.5 billion US Dollars. Jury selection for that broader dispute is expected to commence on April 27.  - January 31, 2026

Spotlight

Malaysia

Nhaveen murder trial: Accused admits taunting victim but denies fatal assault

Malaysia

MCMC probes alleged AI sexual abuse targeting Kedah pupils, teachers

Malaysia

Anwar checks final preparations for Budget 2027

Malaysia

Sarawak election could be called within weeks of Budget 2027

Malaysia

Anwar contacts Prabowo over ‘alarming’ transboundary haze

Malaysia

King calls for schools in haze-hit areas to close

Malaysia

Parents worry over children’s exposure as haze worsens

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

You may be interested

World

US to livestream Nidal Hasan’s firing squad execution on December 3

World

Indonesia forest fire hotspots plunge 67%, but haze and dry weather risks persist

World

Explosions rock Riyadh airport as Yemen’s Houthis claim missile attack

World

AI agents used in cyberattacks targeting South Korean banks, CrowdStrike says

World

59,275 hotspots turn South Sumatra into haze hotspot as respiratory cases surge