World

Aussie cops drop probe into Afghan ‘war crimes’ reporting

Federal police said there were ‘reasonable prospects of conviction’ in case against ABC journalist Daniel Oakes, but it was not in the public interest to proceed with criminal charges

Updated 5 years ago · Published on 15 Oct 2020 2:13PM

Aussie cops drop probe into Afghan ‘war crimes’ reporting
The decision came more than three years after the ABC published the so-called “Afghan files”, which alleged Australian troops had killed unarmed men and children in Afghanistan. – AFP filepic, October 15, 2020

SYDNEY – Police on Thursday dropped a lengthy investigation into a journalist who exposed alleged war crimes by Australian special forces in Afghanistan.

Federal police said prosecutors found there were “reasonable prospects of conviction” in the case against Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) journalist Daniel Oakes, but determined it was not in the public interest to proceed with criminal charges.

The decision came more than three years after the ABC published the so-called “Afghan files”, which alleged Australian troops had killed unarmed men and children in Afghanistan.

Police were investigating Oakes and his producer, Sam Clark, for obtaining classified information from a government whistle blower – even controversially raiding the ABC's Sydney headquarters last year.

In a statement, the federal police said prosecutors “considered a range of public interest factors, including the role of public interest journalism in Australia’s democracy” before deciding not to prosecute.

ABC managing director David Anderson welcomed the news but said authorities never should have considered charges in the first place.

“This whole episode has been both disappointing and disturbing,” he said in a statement.

Last year’s raids on the ABC came a day after police searched the home of a political reporter for Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp over a 2018 article alleging the government planned to expand its powers to spy on Australian citizens.

That case was also dropped earlier this year, but the twin operations sparked a storm of protest from media and civil liberties organisations.

Although the country’s press can report largely free of political interference, strict defamation laws, court gag orders and state security laws impact what can be printed and broadcast.

And unlike most Western democracies, Australia does not have a bill of rights or a constitutionally enshrined protection for freedom of speech.

Following the raids, major news organisations put aside their normally fierce rivalry to jointly call for laws to protect public-interest journalism.

The government subsequently announced new oversight of criminal probes into journalists but insisted on the need to crack down on leaks and said reporters could not be considered above the law. – AFP, October 15, 2020

Spotlight

Malaysia

Nhaveen murder trial: Accused admits taunting victim but denies fatal assault

Malaysia

MCMC probes alleged AI sexual abuse targeting Kedah pupils, teachers

Malaysia

Anwar checks final preparations for Budget 2027

Malaysia

Sarawak election could be called within weeks of Budget 2027

Malaysia

Anwar contacts Prabowo over ‘alarming’ transboundary haze

Malaysia

King calls for schools in haze-hit areas to close

Malaysia

Parents worry over children’s exposure as haze worsens

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

You may be interested

World

Three years after Oct 7, Israeli trauma still shapes attitudes towards Gaza

World

Trump to speak with Putin over reported plague death in Russia

World

59,275 hotspots turn South Sumatra into haze hotspot as respiratory cases surge

World

AI agents used in cyberattacks targeting South Korean banks, CrowdStrike says