Malaysia

Zayn Rayyan case: ‘Neglect’ in charge does not meet WHO or APA definition, court told

Child psychologist tells court that alleged act by mother fails to meet professional standards for child neglect

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 04 Aug 2025 3:26PM

Zayn Rayyan case: ‘Neglect’ in charge does not meet WHO or APA definition, court told
Expert testifies the term “neglect” was not explicitly mentioned in either the police report or the post-mortem findings relating to the six-year-old child - August 4, 2025

THE term “neglect” used in the charge against the mother of the late Zayn Rayyan does not align with the definitions set out by the American Psychological Association (APA) and the World Health Organization (WHO), the Sessions Court heard today.

Dr Noor Aishah Rosli, a child psychology expert and the fifth defence witness in the trial of Ismanira Abdul Manaf, testified that the alleged conduct did not fulfil key professional criteria that define child neglect.

According to Dr Noor Aishah, neglect must involve consistent and prolonged failure in four main areas: emotional care, physical care, education, and provision of basic needs.

“Neglect cannot be determined based on a single incident or isolated act,” she told the court during the defence proceedings before Judge Dr Syahliza Warnoh.

The expert was responding to the amended charge against Ismanira, which accuses her of neglecting her son in a manner that could have caused physical injury. However, Dr Noor Aishah highlighted the use of the word “could” in the charge, describing it as indicating uncertainty in terms of the impact of the alleged act.

She further pointed out that the term “neglect” was not explicitly mentioned in either the police report or the post-mortem findings relating to the six-year-old child.

The trial is scheduled to resume at 2pm today.

According to the amended charge, Ismanira—who had custody of Zayn Rayyan—is accused of neglecting the boy in a way that may have caused physical harm between 12 noon on 5 December 2023 and 9.55pm the following day. The alleged offence is said to have occurred between Block R of the Idaman Apartments in Damansara Damai and a nearby stream.

The charge falls under Section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment, a fine not exceeding RM50,000, or both, upon conviction. - August 4, 2025

Spotlight

Malaysia

Tuanku Muhriz to focus on state affairs; Will not attend Conference of Rulers meeting

Malaysia

Sarawak projects record RM15.09b revenue, budgets RM10.1b for development in 2027

Malaysia

Sultan Nazrin: Delay in environmental action places future generations at risk

Malaysia

Woman allegedly raped at KL shopping centre after being threatened with intimate video

Malaysia

Jordan’s King confers highest civilian honour on Sultan Ibrahim

Malaysia

Driver monitoring aims to stop commercial vehicle crashes before they happen

Malaysia

KTMB heritage sites set for tourism makeover, says Loke

Malaysia

Zara Qairina’s mother: No doctors recorded injuries consistent with being beaten

You may be interested

Malaysia

19-year-old charged with murdering student in Kuantan

Malaysia

Fake Indian police scam in Kulim nets RM1.4m from 73 victims, 53 arrested

Malaysia

Ex-school principal sells land, takes loans before losing RM1.1m in investment scam

Malaysia

MCMC hunts creators of insulting image of King after Threads takedown

Malaysia

JAIS probes viral religious ritual footage, says AI manipulation not ruled out

Malaysia

One of five suspects arrested over helmet attack on 23-year-old in Sabah

Malaysia

Government project contracts to be disclosed from next year - Anwar

Malaysia

PAS Senator comes forward in defence of Eric See-To