Malaysia

Court upholds 28-year jail term and 24 strokes of the cane for man convicted of raping sister-in-law

The Court of Appeal has dismissed the final appeal of a 41-year-old man convicted of three counts of raping his sister-in-law, upholding his 28-year prison sentence and 24 strokes of the cane

Updated 9 months ago · Published on 05 Feb 2026 10:45AM

Court upholds 28-year jail term and 24 strokes of the cane for man convicted of raping sister-in-law
The bench cites the victim’s credible testimony and supporting medical evidence as basis for ruling - February 5, 2026

THE Court of Appeal yesterday confirmed the 28-year prison sentence and 24 strokes of the cane imposed on a man convicted of raping his sister-in-law on three separate occasions, dismissing his final appeal against conviction and sentencing.

The 41-year-old father of two, who had previously been sentenced by the Sessions Court, faced allegations of sexually assaulting the victim when she was 12 years old.

The offences reportedly occurred once in February and twice in July 2021 at a house in Marang, Terengganu.

Delivering the unanimous decision, Justice Datuk Azman Abdullah said the victim’s testimony was corroborated by medical evidence, emphasising that “the victim would not make up stories against the appellant.”

The court also found that the 14-year prison term imposed for each charge by the Sessions Court was not excessive.

The original Sessions Court judgment on September 8, 2024, had sentenced the man to 14 years’ imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane for each count, ordering the sentences for the second and third charges to run concurrently after the completion of the first.

The total number of cane strokes was limited to 24, in accordance with Section 288 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

The High Court had previously dismissed the man’s appeal on May 22 last year, prompting him to escalate the case to the Court of Appeal.

During the appeal hearing, he was represented by lawyer Nik Mohamed Ikhwan Nik Mahamud, while deputy public prosecutor Mohamad Arif Aizuddin Masrom appeared for the prosecution.

The appellate bench, comprising Justices Datuk Azman Abdullah, Datuk Noorin Badaruddin, and Datuk Mohd Radzi Abdul Hamid, concluded that the lower courts’ rulings were justified and proportionate given the gravity of the offences.

This decision underscores the judiciary’s stance on sexual offences, highlighting that corroborated victim testimony, alongside medical evidence, is central to the adjudication of serious criminal cases in Malaysia. - February 5, 2026

Spotlight

Opinion

Can Najib break Madani?

World

Trump offers UFC CEO the position of Press Secretary

Malaysia

Building a great nation begins with happy families, says Anwar

Malaysia

Anwar should sack BN ministers who are not aligned with him – Muhyiddin

Malaysia

AGC rejects claims of defying King’s decree on Najib

Malaysia

Deepavali: Selangor Sultan calls on Malaysians to strengthen unity, reject hatred

Malaysia

If there were still obstacles, why accept the RM50m payment, asks Najib’s daughter

Malaysia

Where did UMNO's RM50 million payment for Najib's release come from?

By The Vibes Says

You may be interested

Malaysia

MOH investigates food poisoning complaints linked to bread product

Malaysia

PM announces additional aid of RM2,500 for each flood victim in Selangor

Malaysia

The question remains: Who paid Najib's RM50m fine?

Malaysia

Najib house arrest order: AG acknowledges glaring errors as questions mount

Malaysia

Anwar comforts crying child, gives RM50 to replace broken toy car (video)

Malaysia

Cybersecurity team spends a week on alert guarding government, private systems

Malaysia

Mujahid: Corruption must be rejected, even when committed by our own

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

32.3 million WhatsApp users in Malaysia face malware threat