Malaysia

Zahid leaves DNAA legal battle to lawyers as court ruling looms

A key Court of Appeal decision approaches on a challenge brought by the Bar Council over prosecutorial decisions in his case

Updated 4 months ago · Published on 03 May 2026 10:21AM

Zahid leaves DNAA legal battle to lawyers as court ruling looms
The Deputy Prime Minister confirms that he is leaving all legal proceedings relating to his discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) to his legal team - May 3, 2026

DEPUTY Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said the continuing legal dispute over his DNAA now rests between the Bar Council and the Attorney General’s Chambers.

Zahid, who also serves as chairman of Barisan Nasional and president of UMNO, said: “On legal matters, they are still being discussed by the Bar Council following the issuance of DNAA and the subsequent decision of no further action.

“So, that is a matter between the Attorney General’s Chambers and the Bar Council.

“This matter will be handled directly by my legal team to resolve the issue in the Court of Appeal as well as the High Court.

“This is because the High Court’s decision will depend on the outcome of the Court of Appeal,” he said in an exclusive interview with Media Prima journalists held in conjunction with the UMNO 80th anniversary convention at the World Trade Centre Kuala Lumpur.

The legal challenge stems from an application filed by the Bar Council on 2 December 2023 seeking a certiorari order to quash the Attorney General’s decision to request a DNAA for Zahid in relation to 47 charges involving criminal breach of trust, corruption and money laundering linked to Yayasan Akalbudi funds.

The Bar Council also sought a declaration that the High Court’s earlier decision was null and void, arguing it was made beyond the powers of the Attorney General.

On 4 September of the same year, the High Court granted Zahid a DNAA for all 47 charges after being informed that the Attorney General’s Chambers intended to discontinue proceedings against him.

Later, on 8 January, the Attorney General’s Chambers confirmed that it had formally classified the matter as “no further action”, effectively closing the case from the prosecution’s standpoint. - May 3, 2026

Spotlight

Malaysia

Umno councillor quits over remarks about DAP at recent PAU

Education

Penang: Schools may be ordered to close if air quality worsens

Malaysia

Catholic bishops call for mutual respect, acceptance, friendship & harmony

Malaysia

No criminal element in Putrajaya teen’s fatal fall, police confirm

Malaysia

Najib pardon bid deferred as Hannah says she gave honest and candid views

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Identity politics could destroy Malaysia’s ambition for unity, says Amirudin

Malaysia

Another former senior minister expected to be called in for questioning?

You may be interested

Malaysia

Umno councillor quits over remarks about DAP at recent PAU

Malaysia

Another former senior minister expected to be called in for questioning?

Malaysia

AGC called on to explain insanity acquittal to family of slain Bandar Utama student

Malaysia

PAS seeks clarity on any political commitment over Zakir Naik extradition

Malaysia

Melaka polls to test PH’s strength, ties with BN, says analyst

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Rembau Undang: Exco cannot override Negeri Sembilan constitution

Malaysia

Malaysia does not need ‘new deal’ to uphold MA63 commitments - Armizan

Malaysia

AGC: Diesel subsidy cuts not subject to judicial review