Malaysia

1MDB gets second chance to challenge US$3.78b judgment against Jho Low

The Court of Appeal orders a fresh High Court hearing of 1MDB’s bid to overturn a US$3.78 billion default judgment against fugitive financier Jho Low and his father

Updated 26 minutes ago · Published on 19 Oct 2026 6:16PM

1MDB gets second chance to challenge US$3.78b judgment against Jho Low
The Appellate Court order reopens the challenge after it was dismissed over a delay of nearly three years - October 19, 2026

1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) has won a fresh hearing of its bid to overturn a US$3.78 billion default judgment against fugitive financier Low Taek Jho, better known as Jho Low, and his father, Larry Low Hock Peng.

The Court of Appeal on Monday allowed an appeal by 1MDB and four subsidiaries, ordering the High Court to rehear their application in full before a different judge.

A three-judge panel comprising Justices Azhahari Kamal Ramli, Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid and Alice Loke Yee Ching fixed Oct 26 for case management.

The decision gives 1MDB another opportunity to challenge the judgment after the High Court dismissed its application last year, citing a delay of almost three years in seeking to set it aside.

The default judgment, entered in 2022, ordered Jho Low and his father to pay US$3.78 billion, with annual interest of five per cent calculated from dates between 2010 and 2014 until full settlement.

The judgment followed the striking out of their defences for failing to comply with a Mareva injunction, which restrains parties from disposing of or transferring assets.

In its 2025 application, 1MDB and its subsidiaries argued that they had not been aware of evidence that emerged in overseas proceedings when the judgment was entered. They said the alleged fraud was sophisticated and involved entities across multiple jurisdictions, and sought a full trial and additional remedies.

The original suit, filed in May 2021, also named Jho Low’s mother, Goh Gaik Ewe, siblings Taek Szen and May Lin, and associate Tan Kim Loong. The claims included fraudulent concealment, fraudulent misappropriation and unjust enrichment.

The Court of Appeal’s ruling does not set aside the US$3.78 billion judgment or determine the merits of the underlying claims. It directs the High Court to reconsider 1MDB’s application. - October 19, 2026

Spotlight

Malaysia

Papagomo acquitted for second time in sedition case over government, Israel claims

Malaysia

ECRL fares start at RM60, with 50% discounts for children, seniors and OKU

Malaysia

DKU seeks court action against Ismail, 16 others over Negeri Sembilan royal dispute

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Kampung Manis: Dreams of 227 families to own replacement homes draw closer

Malaysia

Fadhlina takes legal action over video of 2023 Parliament speech

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Civil servants urged to turn Selangor Sultan’s anti-graft message into action

Malaysia

Animal welfare group urges probe into alleged sexual abuse of cat in viral video

Malaysia

Macron appeals for calm after France riots: 2,400 arrested, nearly 1,000 officers injured

Malaysia

Malaysia renews offer to help Indonesia fight fires

You may be interested

Malaysia

Thousands surrender medical policies as Malaysia prepares affordable MediAsas cover

Malaysia

Ab Rauf: BN to weigh public sentiment before deciding Melaka election pact

Malaysia

Malaysia’s baby bust: A silent crisis threatening the nation’s future prosperity

Malaysia

Could a Black Swan fuel crisis be approaching?

Malaysia

Policeman seriously injured in machete attack during anti-drug raid in Kelantan

Malaysia

NaniRoc denies links to Nik Nazmi khalwat case, condemns online slurs

Malaysia

Twenty-six areas record unhealthy air quality as haze worsens

Malaysia

Civil servants urged to turn Selangor Sultan’s anti-graft message into action