Malaysia

Warisan voices support for legal action over Sabah’s 40% revenue entitlement

‘Never bow down to Putrajaya’s political power’, says party’s youth chief

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 11 Jun 2022 6:28PM

Warisan voices support for legal action over Sabah’s 40% revenue entitlement
Sepanggar MP Datuk Mohd Azis Jamman says he will raise the issue again in the coming parliamentary sitting seeing that the Finance Ministry has yet to answer his questions. – Dato’ Mohd Azis Bin Jamman Facebook pic, June 11, 2022

KOTA KINABALU – Opposition party Warisan expressed its support for the judicial review application filed by the Sabah Law Society (SLS) over the state’s 40% revenue entitlement as it “should not bow down to Putrajaya”.

Warisan youth chief and Sepanggar MP Datuk Mohd Azis Jamman said Putrajaya should be brought to court in order for Sabah to claim its rights as enshrined in the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) and the federal constitution.

“The fight for Sabah’s rights and the future of the Sabahans. Never bow down to Putrajaya’s political power,” he said in a statement today.

He was commenting on the SLS’ move to file its application for a judicial review over the disputed 40% revenue entitlement last Thursday.

Azis said he will raise the issue again in the coming parliamentary sitting seeing that the Finance Ministry has yet to answer his questions.

He added that the fight for the return of funds should be above politics because it involves Sabahans’ rights, interests and future.

He said that after receiving contradictory statements from ministers (on whether the 40% formula still applies), Zafrul revealed a government gazette that clearly stated that the (fixed rate of RM26.7 million agreed upon in 1969) is only effective for five years from January 1, 1969, until 1974.

Azis said the gazette should have been void because it was produced during the emergency and the Emergency Ordinance 1969, which was enforced following the May 13, 1969 tragedy, had been abolished in 2011.

“Any gazette that was approved during the emergency period should also be moot six months from the abolishment date.”

The revenue entitlement has been a subject of much discussion in Sabah. – The Vibes, June 11, 2022

Related News

Malaysia / 3d

Budget 2027: Sabah, Sarawak to receive RM34.9b in federal allocations next year

Malaysia / 6d

Judicial review bid over Tuanku Muhriz's removal withdrawn

Events / 1w

Sarawak and Sabah play key roles in weathering climate change

Malaysia / 1w

Address security concerns and let concert proceed – former Sabah CM

Malaysia / 3w

A message from our publisher and chairman

Malaysia / 4w

Sabah leaders condemn priest and nun joke at UMNO PAU

Spotlight

Malaysia

Tuanku Muhriz to focus on state affairs; Will not attend Conference of Rulers meeting

Malaysia

Sarawak projects record RM15.09b revenue, budgets RM10.1b for development in 2027

Malaysia

Sultan Nazrin: Delay in environmental action places future generations at risk

Malaysia

Woman allegedly raped at KL shopping centre after being threatened with intimate video

Malaysia

Jordan’s King confers highest civilian honour on Sultan Ibrahim

Malaysia

Driver monitoring aims to stop commercial vehicle crashes before they happen

Malaysia

KTMB heritage sites set for tourism makeover, says Loke

Malaysia

Zara Qairina’s mother: No doctors recorded injuries consistent with being beaten

You may be interested

Malaysia

Negeri Ruler, Tuanku Muhriz, invited to Conference of Rulers meeting tomorrow

Malaysia

Government project contracts to be disclosed from next year - Anwar

Malaysia

Singapore solely responsible for Linggiu Dam safety, PETRA Dep Minister says

Malaysia

MCMC probes viral video over allegedly misleading Budget 2027 tax claims

Malaysia

PM to announce latest on proposed Health Services Commission, says Dr Dzulkefly

Malaysia

Nepal flood disaster: Families of 54 missing Malaysians seek debt freeze as legal limbo deepens

Malaysia

Sinkhole mapping to be stepped up through Federal-state cooperation

Malaysia

MACC warns data leaks could expose witnesses, derail corruption probes