Malaysia

[UPDATED] Govt fails bid to strike out Indira Gandhi’s RM100 mil suit

Mother sues authorities for delays in finding her youngest child taken by ex-husband

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 07 Sep 2022 12:49PM

[UPDATED] Govt fails bid to strike out Indira Gandhi’s RM100 mil suit
M. Indira Gandhi sues the government and the police for RM100 million in a civil suit for delays in recovering her child, Prasana Diksa, who was taken away and converted into Islam by her ex-husband, Muhammad Riduan Abdullah. – The Vibes file pic, September 7, 2022

by Amar Shah Mohsen

KUALA LUMPUR – M. Indira Gandhi’s RM100 million civil suit against the police and government will now proceed after the latter failed in their appeal to strike out her nonfeasance suit. 

A three-member Court of Appeal panel found that the government’s application was without merit and ordered for the case to be remitted back to the high court, where it will undergo trial over the authorities’ failure to locate her youngest daughter despite a court order.

Case management has been set for September 14. 

Indira Gandhi filed the suit in October 2020 following protracted delays by the police to recover the child, Prasana Diksa, from her ex-husband, Muhammad Riduan Abdullah, who unilaterally converted the couple’s children to Islam.

In her suit, she named the inspector-general of the Royal Malaysian Police, the Home Ministry, and the government as defendants – claiming the authorities had deliberately and negligently ignored a previous mandamus order from the Federal Court to probe and take appropriate action to locate and return Prasana.

Riduan, formerly known as K. Patmanathan before his conversion to Islam in 2009, had reportedly abducted Prasana when she was 11 months old. She is 14 years old this year. 

Appeals court judge Datuk Hanipah Farikullah, in dismissing the government’s appeal today, said the complexity of the issue required a full hearing while ordering RM10,000 in costs to be paid to Indira Gandhi. 

Other than Hanipah, who chaired the panel, the other judges presiding over the case were Datuk Gunalan Muniandy and Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim. 

Indira Gandhi was represented by Rajesh Nagarajan and Sachpreetraj Singh Sohanpal from Raj & Sach Associates. 

In a virtual press conference after the decision was delivered, Indira Gandhi said the delayed action by the police is a poor reflection of the force, adding that the lack of updates she has received pertaining to Prasana was very depressing. 

She also took the current Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Acryl Sani Abdullah Sani to task for his inaction and silence over the case, insisting he should address a matter of public interest. 

Meanwhile, Indira Gandhi Action Team chairman Arun Dorasamy said it is saddening that the case had to go through an exhausting legal process against the police, whose solemn duty was to protect every citizen. 

“We don’t even know what has happened to Prasana. We really hope she is alive and well.

“We have no way of knowing. Whatever the conspiracy and justification for the police’s lack of action is, Indira Gandhi deserves justice.”

He added that the high court had previously set February 5 to February 9, 2024, for the trial. 

Today’s court decision is the second time the government has failed in its bid to strike out Indira Gandhi’s suit.

On July 16 last year, the high court similarly dismissed the government’s application.

Indira Gandhi and Riduan married on April 10, 1993, and have three children — the other two being Tevi Darsiny, 23, and Karan Dinish, 22. 

In 2009, Riduan unilaterally converted their kids to Islam and obtained custody of them from the Ipoh shariah court.

Indira Gandhi then filed an application for full custody of the children, which was granted by the Ipoh High Court in March 2010, although Prasana was forcibly taken by Riduan. The couple divorced on August 8, 2012. 

Despite an arrest warrant for Riduan issued by the high court in 2014, police have yet to locate him. He was last believed to be living in a neighbouring country. 

In 2018, the Federal Court ruled that the unilateral conversion of the three children to Islam was invalid in a landmark decision. – The Vibes, September 7, 2022

Related News

Malaysia / 1w

Year One pupil found dead at apartment complex

Malaysia / 4w

Irene Sofiya had wanted to become a doctor like her late mother

Malaysia / 1mth

No ventilator, no sleep: Doctor recalls keeping critically ill baby alive on helicopter (video)

Malaysia / 3mth

Mother: ‘The lives of my kids matter more than any VIP’

Malaysia / 3mth

Mother, two daughters found dead in Ipoh house

Opinion / 3mth

Orang Asli in Pahang: Token gestures or genuine recognition?

Spotlight

Malaysia

Wan Ahmad Fayhsal proposes Shuhaily for corporate mafia task force

Malaysia

Denai Alam, TTDI, and PJ hit by flash floods this afternoon (video)

Malaysia

Police open probe into case of Penang assemblyman who allegedly beat wife

Malaysia

Elderly woman found dead in drain outside Rembau home

Education

Flood-risk SPM candidates to be relocated to boarding schools ahead of monsoon

Business

BananaBro founder Tony Lim dies, remembered for vision to take banana leaf cuisine global

Malaysia

Adly tells PH to focus on winning Melaka seats, not CM post

Health

MOH seizes RM405k worth of illegally sold weight-loss drugs

You may be interested

Malaysia

Police probe group’s unauthorised removal of residents from Klang rehabilitation centre

Malaysia

Malaysia to seek Pakistan's cooperation over 130 citizens detained in suspected scam operation

Malaysia

Scammers exploit public sympathy with AI-generated fake donation appeals

Malaysia

Works Ministry urged to demand written explanation from LLM over TuJu app

Malaysia

Victor Chin renews bid to testify remotely from China in RM49.85m M Jets lawsuit

Malaysia

Adly tells PH to focus on winning Melaka seats, not CM post

Malaysia

No areas record unhealthy air quality readings nationwide

Malaysia

Two men killed in Myvi-Vellfire collision on MRR2