Malaysia

Crackhouse’s Rizal again fails to have cybercrime charges thrown out

Defence says will likely send another representation letter to get his three counts dismissed

Updated 3 years ago · Published on 31 May 2023 1:37PM

Crackhouse’s Rizal again fails to have cybercrime charges thrown out
Crackhouse Comedy Club owner Mohamad Rizal van Geyzel is accused of making and initiating the transmission of offensive communications with the intent to offend others via his social media accounts. – SYEDA IMRAN/The Vibes file pic, May 31, 2023

KUALA LUMPUR – Crackhouse Comedy Club owner Mohamad Rizal van Geyzel has failed in his bid to dismiss all three charges against him for creating and initiating the distribution of videos that touch on racial sensitivity on social media.

Today, the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) has rejected Rizal’s second letter of representation that was sent last month, reported The Edge.

His lawyer Pravin Mahentharan told the sessions court here that the defence will likely send another letter.

Judge Priscilla Hemamalini Nadarajan set June 13 for case mention.

On January 20, the AGC had rejected the representation filed by Rizal on December 12 last year to have the three charges dropped.

Rizal, 40, was accused of making and initiating the transmission of offensive communications with the intent to offend others via Facebook using the profile name “Rizal van Geyzel,” Instagram profile “rizalvangeyzel,” and TikTok account “rizalvangeyzel”, between July 4 and 6, 2022.

The three posts were read at the Cyber and Multimedia Crime Investigation Division Office, Bukit Aman Commercial Crime Investigation Department, Bukit Aman Police Headquarters, 27th Floor, KPJ Tower here, at 1.17pm on July 13, 2022.

The charges were framed under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 – punishable under Section 233(3) of the same act – which provides a maximum fine of RM50,000 or imprisonment not exceeding one year or both, and shall be further fined RM1,000 for every day that the offence is repeated after conviction, if convicted. – Bernama, May 31, 2023

Related News

Malaysia / 1y

Malaysia to sign convention on cybercrime this October – Saifuddin Nasution

Malaysia / 3y

Crackhouse club owners drop legal action against DBKL

Malaysia / 3y

Crackhouse’s Rizal gets fine for offensive Facebook posts

Malaysia / 3y

Telegram to cooperate with MCMC, cops to curb cybercrime: Fahmi

Malaysia / 3y

Cyber Security Bill to be drafted right away: Anwar

Malaysia / 3y

AGC yet to decide on Crackhouse owner Rizal’s third representation

Spotlight

Malaysia

Papagomo acquitted for second time in sedition case over government, Israel claims

Malaysia

ECRL fares start at RM60, with 50% discounts for children, seniors and OKU

Malaysia

DKU seeks court action against Ismail, 16 others over Negeri Sembilan royal dispute

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Kampung Manis: Dreams of 227 families to own replacement homes draw closer

Malaysia

Fadhlina takes legal action over video of 2023 Parliament speech

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Civil servants urged to turn Selangor Sultan’s anti-graft message into action

Malaysia

Animal welfare group urges probe into alleged sexual abuse of cat in viral video

Malaysia

Macron appeals for calm after France riots: 2,400 arrested, nearly 1,000 officers injured

Malaysia

Malaysia renews offer to help Indonesia fight fires

You may be interested

Malaysia

PM orders faster rollout of Budget 2027 aid, warns against bureaucratic delays

Malaysia

Civil servants urged to turn Selangor Sultan’s anti-graft message into action

Malaysia

NaniRoc denies links to Nik Nazmi khalwat case, condemns online slurs

Malaysia

Sarawak deputy premier warns of increasing threats of vaping

Malaysia

MCMC warns cyberbullies, AI disinformation offenders as online safety comes under scrutiny

Malaysia

King appoints three Malaysian envoys to Canada, Belgium and Iran

Malaysia

Malaysia’s baby bust: A silent crisis threatening the nation’s future prosperity

Malaysia

1MDB gets second chance to challenge US$3.78b judgment against Jho Low