Malaysia

CoA dismisses family’s appeal on Karuna Nithi’s death in lock-up

Suit filed same as that earlier filed in lower court in 2018, judges rule

Updated 3 years ago · Published on 19 Oct 2023 5:56PM

CoA dismisses family’s appeal on Karuna Nithi’s death in lock-up
Reading out the decision, Justice Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali says while the second suit tried a different approach by seeking relief over alleged contravention of fundamental rights under the federal constitution, the said suit still in essence was seeking compensation from the government over Karuna Nithi’s death. – SYEDA IMRAN/The Vibes file pic, October 19, 2023

PUTRAJAYA – The Court of Appeal today rejected a family’s appeal to set aside the high court’s decision which dismissed their legal action against the government over a police detainee P. Karuna Nithi’s death in 2013.

A three-member bench comprising CoA judges Datuk S. Nantha Balan, Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali and Datuk Choo Kah Sing, in a unanimous decision said that the originating summons by the family is the same as the one earlier filed at the Seremban High Court in 2018.

In February last year, the Kuala Lumpur High Court dismissed the family’s second suit, which was filed in 2021.

Reading out the decision, Justice Nazlan said while the second suit tried a different approach by seeking relief over alleged contravention of fundamental rights under the federal constitution, the said suit still in essence was seeking compensation from the government over Karuna Nithi’s death.

“In our judgment, while the cause of action for the second suit appears different from the first legal action, it is inaccurate to say that the current suit would not be a matter of the earlier suit.

“Given the similarity of the two actions, the appellants (family) could have included the present claim in the earlier suit but they failed to do so. 

“The court found that Section 2(a) of the Public Authorities Protection Act is not ultra vires Article 8 of the federal constitution.

“Therefore, we dismiss the appeal with no order as to cost,” he said adding that the legal principle of res judicata comes into effect in this case.

Res judicata is a legal maxim meaning a thing or matter that has been finally juridically decided on its merits and cannot be litigated again between the same parties.

Karuna Nithi’s family was represented by counsel T. Manoharan while senior federal counsel Donald Joseph Franklin represented the 16 respondents including policemen and the government.

Karuna Nithi’s widow R. Kaliamah and her two sons K. Yugesh Varan and K. Kisho Kumar filed the originating summons on January 26, 2021 against 16 defendants including 14 policemen and the government to compensate for Karuna Nithi’s death. 

Karuna Nithi was arrested on May 28, 2013 but died in custody on June 1, 2013, with 49 fresh injuries on his body.

In January 2015, the coroner’s open verdict ruled that Karuna Nithi’s death was due to several factors, including beatings by police as well as other inmates, resulting in him sustaining the 49 injuries.

Following an inquest, the family filed a suit for negligence and assault against the defendants for causing the death of the deceased at the high court in Seremban on January 25, 2018. 

However, the court dismissed the family’s suit on grounds that it was filed out of time in 2018, which was far longer than three years after Karuna Nithi’s death in custody in 2013. The CoA also maintained the decision.

The Federal Court in December 2020 also dismissed the family’s appeal on grounds that the suit was time barred under Section 2(a) PAPA, as cause of action should start from the date of the death of the deceased and not from the date of the inquest verdict. – Bernama, October 19, 2023

Related News

Malaysia / 5mth

Court of Appeal: Emergency proclamations beyond judicial review

Malaysia / 7mth

Family takes issue of government responsibility in Altantuya's death to Federal Court

Malaysia / 9mth

Court of Appeal rejects Najib’s bid to reinstate RM1.9m civil suit against Tommy Thomas

Malaysia / 1y

Court dismisses ex-AG special officer’s appeal in lawsuit against Rewcastle-Brown

Malaysia / 2y

Muhyiddin files for leave to review Court of Appeal ruling reinstating power abuse charges

Malaysia / 2y

Court of Appeal upholds death sentence in Kevin Morais murder

Spotlight

Malaysia

Papagomo acquitted for second time in sedition case over government, Israel claims

Malaysia

ECRL fares start at RM60, with 50% discounts for children, seniors and OKU

Malaysia

DKU seeks court action against Ismail, 16 others over Negeri Sembilan royal dispute

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Kampung Manis: Dreams of 227 families to own replacement homes draw closer

Malaysia

Fadhlina takes legal action over video of 2023 Parliament speech

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Civil servants urged to turn Selangor Sultan’s anti-graft message into action

Malaysia

Animal welfare group urges probe into alleged sexual abuse of cat in viral video

Malaysia

Macron appeals for calm after France riots: 2,400 arrested, nearly 1,000 officers injured

Malaysia

Malaysia renews offer to help Indonesia fight fires

You may be interested

Malaysia

Malaysia must win trust of both sides to move Southern Thailand peace process forward

Malaysia

DAP lawmakers’ risk being dropped as party tightens KPI checks ahead of GE16

Malaysia

Fadhlina takes legal action over video of 2023 Parliament speech

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Thousands surrender medical policies as Malaysia prepares affordable MediAsas cover

Malaysia

MCMC warns cyberbullies, AI disinformation offenders as online safety comes under scrutiny

Malaysia

Anwar: Malaysia still owes RM8.9b in 1MDB liabilities

Malaysia

Malaysia offers aircraft, helicopters and 50 personnel to fight Indonesian fires

Malaysia

Fahmi condemns threats against UM student over corruption remarks

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir