Malaysia

CoA dismisses family’s appeal on Karuna Nithi’s death in lock-up

Suit filed same as that earlier filed in lower court in 2018, judges rule

Updated 6 months ago · Published on 19 Oct 2023 5:56PM

CoA dismisses family’s appeal on Karuna Nithi’s death in lock-up
Reading out the decision, Justice Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali says while the second suit tried a different approach by seeking relief over alleged contravention of fundamental rights under the federal constitution, the said suit still in essence was seeking compensation from the government over Karuna Nithi’s death. – SYEDA IMRAN/The Vibes file pic, October 19, 2023

PUTRAJAYA – The Court of Appeal today rejected a family’s appeal to set aside the high court’s decision which dismissed their legal action against the government over a police detainee P. Karuna Nithi’s death in 2013.

A three-member bench comprising CoA judges Datuk S. Nantha Balan, Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali and Datuk Choo Kah Sing, in a unanimous decision said that the originating summons by the family is the same as the one earlier filed at the Seremban High Court in 2018.

In February last year, the Kuala Lumpur High Court dismissed the family’s second suit, which was filed in 2021.

Reading out the decision, Justice Nazlan said while the second suit tried a different approach by seeking relief over alleged contravention of fundamental rights under the federal constitution, the said suit still in essence was seeking compensation from the government over Karuna Nithi’s death.

“In our judgment, while the cause of action for the second suit appears different from the first legal action, it is inaccurate to say that the current suit would not be a matter of the earlier suit.

“Given the similarity of the two actions, the appellants (family) could have included the present claim in the earlier suit but they failed to do so. 

“The court found that Section 2(a) of the Public Authorities Protection Act is not ultra vires Article 8 of the federal constitution.

“Therefore, we dismiss the appeal with no order as to cost,” he said adding that the legal principle of res judicata comes into effect in this case.

Res judicata is a legal maxim meaning a thing or matter that has been finally juridically decided on its merits and cannot be litigated again between the same parties.

Karuna Nithi’s family was represented by counsel T. Manoharan while senior federal counsel Donald Joseph Franklin represented the 16 respondents including policemen and the government.

Karuna Nithi’s widow R. Kaliamah and her two sons K. Yugesh Varan and K. Kisho Kumar filed the originating summons on January 26, 2021 against 16 defendants including 14 policemen and the government to compensate for Karuna Nithi’s death. 

Karuna Nithi was arrested on May 28, 2013 but died in custody on June 1, 2013, with 49 fresh injuries on his body.

In January 2015, the coroner’s open verdict ruled that Karuna Nithi’s death was due to several factors, including beatings by police as well as other inmates, resulting in him sustaining the 49 injuries.

Following an inquest, the family filed a suit for negligence and assault against the defendants for causing the death of the deceased at the high court in Seremban on January 25, 2018. 

However, the court dismissed the family’s suit on grounds that it was filed out of time in 2018, which was far longer than three years after Karuna Nithi’s death in custody in 2013. The CoA also maintained the decision.

The Federal Court in December 2020 also dismissed the family’s appeal on grounds that the suit was time barred under Section 2(a) PAPA, as cause of action should start from the date of the death of the deceased and not from the date of the inquest verdict. – Bernama, October 19, 2023

Related News

Malaysia / 1mth

Muhyiddin files for leave to review Court of Appeal ruling reinstating power abuse charges

Malaysia / 1mth

Court of Appeal upholds death sentence in Kevin Morais murder

Malaysia / 5mth

Court upholds man’s 42-year jail term for raping stepdaughter 105 times

Malaysia / 7mth

Court fixes Feb 28, 29 for appeal hearing against Muhyiddin’s acquittal

Malaysia / 7mth

Court of Appeal restores ban on ‘Gay is OK!’ book

Malaysia / 7mth

Cut it out: CoA slashes RM3.1 mil award in botched circumcision case

Spotlight

Malaysia

Chegubard charged with sedition, again

Malaysia

MACC questions Perlis MB over investigation into his son

Malaysia

Malaysian youth’s stint with Tesla opens doors

By Sophia Ahmad

Videos

Chinese accountancy graduate earns coveted Green Beret

Malaysia

Jho Low suspected owner of seized Bugatti car

Malaysia

MyPPP returns after long hiatus

By Ian McIntyre

You may be interested

Malaysia

Hoteliers can expect more occupancy growth driven by foreigners, says MAH

By Noel Achariam

Malaysia

MACC questions Perlis MB over investigation into his son

Malaysia

Malaysian youth’s stint with Tesla opens doors

By Sophia Ahmad

Malaysia

Chegubard claims trial to defamation, sedition charges

Malaysia

Papagomo arrested over alleged seditious remarks against king

Malaysia

Sabah minister hits out at ‘slow pace’ of public sector

Malaysia

More charges against Chegubard in JB tomorrow, says his lawyer

Malaysia

Pakatan’s KKB candidate reveals SPM results after PAS man’s challenge