World

Toronto ‘incel’ van attack not due to ASD: prosecutor

Prosecutor says attacker cannot claim criminal irresponsibility

Updated 5 years ago · Published on 19 Dec 2020 7:00PM

Toronto ‘incel’ van attack not due to ASD: prosecutor
10 people – eight of which were women – were killed in the April 2018 Toronto van attack, which also injured 16 more. The attacker’s defence had claimed that his misogyny was due to his mental state of mind, but prosecutors argue otherwise. – AFP pic, December 19, 2020

TORONTO – A Canadian man inspired by the misogynist “incel” movement to kill 10 people by ploughing a van into pedestrians in Toronto was aware of his actions and cannot claim criminal irresponsibility, prosecutors said.

Alek Minassian had pleaded “not criminally responsible” due to his autism spectrum disorder (ASD) at the start of his trial last month for the April 2018 attack that killed eight women and two men and injured 16 others.

“This is about a person who committed mass murder who happened to have ASD, not that the ASD made him commit murders,” Crown attorney Joe Callaghan told the court in Toronto yesterday. 

“He always had an understanding, an awareness – more than awareness – that from society’s perspective, his choice to kill was wrong.”

Minassian faces 10 charges of premeditated murder and 16 of attempted murder following the rampage where he drove a rented van at high speeds along 2km of roads and sidewalks, indiscriminately targeting passers-by.

Just prior to the attack, he posted on Facebook: “The incel rebellion has already begun,” and referenced American mass killer Elliot Rodger who committed a similar attack in California.

During interrogation, he described the anger he felt toward women and said this had motivated the attack.

He said he had joined an online community of like-minded men who described themselves as “incels” or “involuntary celibates,” whose sexual frustrations led them to embrace a misogynist ideology.

Since he has already admitted to planning and carrying out the carnage, the trial will focus on Minassian’s state of mind and criminal responsibility at the time of the attack, not whether he was the perpetrator.

His defence has argued that his mental state left him devoid of empathy, unable to discern right from wrong and incapable of making rational choices. – AFP, December 19, 2020

Spotlight

Business

Ringgit gains as oil prices plunge on hopes of Iran conflict de-escalation

Events

UKM to establish academic research platform named after Dr Wan Azizah

Malaysia

Deepavali preparations destroyed as flash floods inundate Sungai Buloh homes

Malaysia

Melaka polls: Calm campaign puts focus on what parties can offer voters

Malaysia

Anwar challenges Hadi over ‘Dajjal’ label

Malaysia

Shuhaily remains AKPS chief pending official transfer order, says lawyer

Malaysia

Najib's former wife Tengku Puteri Zainah passes away

Malaysia

Matrade exposes scam involving fake procurement orders, advance payment demands

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

“Don’t panic,” Govt assures stable essential goods supply amid geopolitical tensions, monsoon threat

You may be interested

World

Iran warns countries aiding US military action will become 'legitimate targets'

World

Death toll from Russian strike on Ukraine aid distribution point rises to 53

World

Nearly 90 million displaced people exposed to climate risks, UNHCR warns

World

Iran claims three vessels catch fire in Strait of Hormuz, captures two US drones

World

US sanctions 45 entities linked to Cambodia cybercrime syndicate

World

Trump faces Republican revolt after midterm rout puts Democrats in control of Congress

World

France braces for nationwide strikes and protests as Macron seeks to avert fresh unrest

World

Iran reports six vessels ablaze in separate Strait of Hormuz incidents