PARIS – Air France and Airbus will go on trial today on charges of involuntary manslaughter over the fatal 2009 crash of a jet heading to Paris from Brazil, killing all 228 people aboard.
Victims’ families and some aviation experts say the pilots were insufficiently trained to handle a loss of speed readings caused by crucial equipment freezing over in a storm.
Flight AF447 from Rio de Janeiro plunged into the Atlantic Ocean in the early hours of June 1, 2009, after entering a zone near the equator known for strong turbulence.
The Airbus A330 was carrying 12 crew members and 216 passengers. It was the carrier’s deadliest crash.
It took nearly two years to locate the bulk of the fuselage and recover the black box flight recorders.
Air France and Airbus were charged as the inquiry progressed, with experts determining the crash resulted from mistakes made by pilots disoriented by so-called Pitot speed-monitoring tubes that had frozen over in thick clouds.
But investigating magistrates overseeing the case dropped the charges in 2019, a decision that infuriated victims’ families.
Prosecutors appealed the decision, and in 2021 a Paris court ruled there was sufficient evidence for a trial to go ahead.
Ophelie Toulliou, who lost her brother on the flight, said it was essential “the truth come out, and that the sentences, if deserved, are handed down”.
“But the message is also to make companies that think they’re untouchable understand: ‘You’re like everyone else and if you make mistakes, you will be punished,” she said.
The court will hear testimony from dozens of aviation experts and pilots over two months of hearings, and each company faces a maximum fine of €225,000 euros (RM1.02 million).
There will also be analysis of the final minutes in the cockpit before the plane went into free fall after entering a so-called “intertropical convergence zone” that often produces volatile storms with heavy precipitation.
In the cold, the Pitot tubes froze, a problem that had already been reported by other pilots – and which were quickly replaced on planes worldwide in the months after the accident.
“We’ve lost our speeds,” one pilot is heard saying in the flight recordings, before other indicators mistakenly show a loss of altitude, and a series of alarm messages appear on the cockpit screens.
The pilots start climbing and even though a “STALL” alert sounds, they reach 11,600m.
“I don’t know what’s happening,” one of the pilots is heard saying as the stall begins.
The crash prompted an overhaul of training protocols across the industry, in particular to prepare pilots to handle the intense stress of unforeseen circumstances.
Pilots are also now required to continually practice stall responses on simulators.
“That was the big change after this accident for all civil airline companies. Before, it was something pilots learned in basic training and then they were never trained again,” one airline executive said on condition of anonymity.
Testimony will also be heard from some of the 476 members of victims’ families who are civil plaintiffs in the case.
But Nelson Faria Marinho, president of the Brazilian association of victims’ relatives, said: “I’m not expecting anything from this trial.”
“Even if there is a conviction, who will be punished? The CEOs? They were changed at Airbus and Air France a long time ago,” he said during an interview at his Rio home.
He will be represented by former French pilot Gerard Arnoux, who has advised several of the victims’ families and wrote a book titled Rio-Paris Is Not Responding: AF447, the Crash that Should Not Have Happened. – AFP, October 10, 2022
.jpg)
