Malaysia

KK Supermart files suit against supplier over ‘Allah’ socks issue

Company claims defendant placed socks at its premises without being supervised by store workers

Updated 2 years ago · Published on 26 Mar 2024 7:30AM

KK Supermart files suit against supplier over ‘Allah’ socks issue
KK Supermart & Superstore Sdn Bhd is seeking RM21 million for losses and damages from Xin Jian Chang Sdn Bhd and its director Soh Chin Huat. Pixabay pic.

KK SUPERMART & Superstore Sdn Bhd filed a lawsuit against Xin Jian Chang Sdn Bhd and its director Soh Chin Huat yesterday over alleged breach of contract and sabotage after the company was supplied with socks bearing the word “Allah” without its knowledge.

KK Supermart filed the lawsuit through Messrs David Gurupatham & Koay at the Shah Alam High Court, naming Soh and his company as first and second defendants.

Lawyer Datuk David Gurupatham, representing KK Supermart confirmed the filing when contacted by Bernama, stating that his client is seeking RM1.5 million in compensation over the loss of income, RM10,500 for damage caused to the company’s brand name, RM20.3 million for the company’s aborted proposed stock market listing, aggravated, punitive and exemplary damages and other relief deemed reasonable by the court.

KK Supermart has also applied for a prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from further causing losses by way of unlawful interference to its business.

The statement of claim filed by the plaintiff showed that KK Supermart and both defendants signed an agreement to supply products for sale on consignment at its premises, subject to the contract’s terms and conditions.

The plaintiff alleges that on February 5, the second defendant requested permission from the plaintiff to supply arm covers, which was allowed on good faith but was not notified or informed that the barcode of this product would be used for the sale of socks bearing the word “Allah” at its premises.

Based on the plaintiff’s record, the defendant had placed the socks at the premises without being supervised by the store’s workers as only a cashier was on duty and alleged that the defendant had deliberately sabotaged its business and destroyed its reputation, which resulted in a boycott and negative comments from the public. – Bernama, March 26, 2024

Related News

Malaysia / 3mth

Deaf e-hailing driver sues government, police over alleged assault, seeks disability access reforms

Malaysia / 9mth

MCMC mulls legal action against X over user safety

Malaysia / 1y

Muhyiddin: Bersatu considering options to sue MACC over frozen accounts

Opinion / 2y

Threats over socks: No place for mob justice in this country – G25

Opinion / 2y

Offensive socks: Accepting an apology is a noble gesture in certain circumstances – Hanipa Maidin

Malaysia / 3y

[UPDATED] Anwar sues Sanusi for alleged defamatory remarks during GE15

Spotlight

Malaysia

PH denies role in RoS suspension of Perikatan Nasional

Malaysia

Police hunt two suspects after BMW shot at in Sitiawan

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Mohamad Hasan turned away from Lendu nomination centre despite having EC pass

Business

Three Malaysian brands rank among Asean's 10 most valuable, led by Petronas

Malaysia

Melaka PRN: 79 candidates vying for 28 state seats

Malaysia

Melaka PRN: Adly Zahari faces three challengers in Bukit Katil

Malaysia

Shuhaily's return to police force remains a ministry matter, AGC says

You may be interested

Malaysia

Shuhaily’s return to police force awaits King’s consent - IGP

Malaysia

Melaka PRN: Adly Zahari faces three challengers in Bukit Katil

Malaysia

Kluang council shuts down LED screens after cyberattack displays obscene content

Malaysia

Bursa urged to turn more local firms into regional players, create high-skilled jobs

Malaysia

Sabah, Sarawak agree in principle to secure 35% of parliamentary seats

Malaysia

Yunazri banking on young voters to spring Tanjung Bidara surprise

Malaysia

Police may send team to Pakistan over detention of 130 Malaysians in scam raid

Malaysia

Appellate Court reserves decision on Sabah's 40% revenue entitlement appeal