Malaysia

Court upholds 28-year jail term and 24 strokes of the cane for man convicted of raping sister-in-law

The Court of Appeal has dismissed the final appeal of a 41-year-old man convicted of three counts of raping his sister-in-law, upholding his 28-year prison sentence and 24 strokes of the cane

Updated 8 months ago · Published on 05 Feb 2026 10:45AM

Court upholds 28-year jail term and 24 strokes of the cane for man convicted of raping sister-in-law
The bench cites the victim’s credible testimony and supporting medical evidence as basis for ruling - February 5, 2026

THE Court of Appeal yesterday confirmed the 28-year prison sentence and 24 strokes of the cane imposed on a man convicted of raping his sister-in-law on three separate occasions, dismissing his final appeal against conviction and sentencing.

The 41-year-old father of two, who had previously been sentenced by the Sessions Court, faced allegations of sexually assaulting the victim when she was 12 years old.

The offences reportedly occurred once in February and twice in July 2021 at a house in Marang, Terengganu.

Delivering the unanimous decision, Justice Datuk Azman Abdullah said the victim’s testimony was corroborated by medical evidence, emphasising that “the victim would not make up stories against the appellant.”

The court also found that the 14-year prison term imposed for each charge by the Sessions Court was not excessive.

The original Sessions Court judgment on September 8, 2024, had sentenced the man to 14 years’ imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane for each count, ordering the sentences for the second and third charges to run concurrently after the completion of the first.

The total number of cane strokes was limited to 24, in accordance with Section 288 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

The High Court had previously dismissed the man’s appeal on May 22 last year, prompting him to escalate the case to the Court of Appeal.

During the appeal hearing, he was represented by lawyer Nik Mohamed Ikhwan Nik Mahamud, while deputy public prosecutor Mohamad Arif Aizuddin Masrom appeared for the prosecution.

The appellate bench, comprising Justices Datuk Azman Abdullah, Datuk Noorin Badaruddin, and Datuk Mohd Radzi Abdul Hamid, concluded that the lower courts’ rulings were justified and proportionate given the gravity of the offences.

This decision underscores the judiciary’s stance on sexual offences, highlighting that corroborated victim testimony, alongside medical evidence, is central to the adjudication of serious criminal cases in Malaysia. - February 5, 2026

Spotlight

Malaysia

Tuanku Muhriz to focus on state affairs; Will not attend Conference of Rulers meeting

Malaysia

Sarawak projects record RM15.09b revenue, budgets RM10.1b for development in 2027

Malaysia

Sultan Nazrin: Delay in environmental action places future generations at risk

Malaysia

Woman allegedly raped at KL shopping centre after being threatened with intimate video

Malaysia

Jordan’s King confers highest civilian honour on Sultan Ibrahim

Malaysia

Driver monitoring aims to stop commercial vehicle crashes before they happen

Malaysia

KTMB heritage sites set for tourism makeover, says Loke

Malaysia

Zara Qairina’s mother: No doctors recorded injuries consistent with being beaten

You may be interested

Malaysia

Lawyers warn of civil suits over claims linking police officers to crime syndicate

Malaysia

Irene Sofiya murder probe referred to Johor prosecutors for review

Malaysia

KTMB heritage sites set for tourism makeover, says Loke

Malaysia

One of five suspects arrested over helmet attack on 23-year-old in Sabah

Malaysia

MCMC probes viral video over allegedly misleading Budget 2027 tax claims

Malaysia

RM2,000 minimum wage: Firms with sales below RM50m exempt from 2027 hike

Malaysia

Foreign spouses do not automatically qualify as Bumiputera, says Saifuddin

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

PKR leader challenges BN to state position on Eric See-To controversy

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir