Malaysia

‘Najib’s defence sought adjournment only to postpone hearing’

Lead prosecutor Datuk V. Sithambaram lambasts ‘audacity’ of ex-PM’s legal team

Updated 3 years ago · Published on 22 Feb 2023 1:18PM

‘Najib’s defence sought adjournment only to postpone hearing’
Datuk V. Sithambaram (pic) says that Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s defence team had already known the dates for the trials four months in advance, while necessary documents pertaining to the case had been given to the defence team two months prior to the trial in August of 2022. – AZIM RAHMAN/The Vibes file pic, February 22, 2023

by Danial Dzulkifly

PUTRAJAYA – All the defence team wanted in Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s application to review his conviction and sentence in the SRC International Sdn Bhd case at the Federal Court was to get the trial postponed, the prosecution said today.

Lead prosecutor Datuk V. Sithambaram, in his submission to the apex court today, said Najib’s lead counsel, then Datuk Hisyam Teh Poh Teik, as well as solicitors from Zaid Ibrahim Suflan TH Liew & Partners, all had as their main objective the adjournment of the review after they failed their bid to introduce new evidence at the last minute.

The new evidence was a supposed conflict of interest with high court judge Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali, who found Najib guilty in July 2020, because of Nazlan’s previous role in Maybank as general counsel, which exposed him to knowledge about SRC International.

Sithambaram said that Najib’s defence team had already known the dates for the trials four months in advance, while necessary documents pertaining to the case had been given to the defence team two months prior to the trial in August of 2022.

He posited that Najib and his new legal team had six to eight weeks to prepare for the appeals, but did not prepare because they assumed that the application for additional evidence would succeed, and the case would be remitted to the high court.

“The applicant and his new counsels’ insisted on an adjournment saying they were not ready to proceed with the appeals.

“This, we submit, is a strategy that went wrong and a clear demonstration of complacency in the preparation of the hearing of the appeals.

“No solicitor should have the audacity to accept a brief and appear on the hearing date with the sole aim of securing an adjournment without being prepared for the eventuality that the appeals may proceed,” he said.

Ahead of Najib’s appeal to the Federal Court last year, he had on July 25, 2022 written to the apex court that he was to discharge Shafee & Co from representing him in the final appeal.

Hisyam and Zaid were then replaced as lead counsel and solicitor respectively.

During the trial however, Hisyam repeatedly asked for adjournment and even requested to discharge himself, but was denied by the previous five-person panel led by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat.

During the final appeal hearing, Zaid’s firm was discharged as solicitors, leaving Hisyam and his two co-counsels to represent Najib.

The Federal Court on August 23 upheld Najib’s conviction and sentence to 12 years in prison and RM210 million fine.

The decision was made by the bench led by Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, comprising Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim and apex court judges Datuk Nallini Pathmanathan, Datuk Mary Lim, and Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Diah.

In this review application, the five-person panel is led by Sabah and Sarawak chief judge Datuk Abdul Rahman Sebl and comprise Datuk Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang, Datuk Nordin Hassan, and Datuk Abu Bakar Jais. – The Vibes, February 22, 2023

Related News

Malaysia / 2y

Najib called the shots on SRC matters, including RM4 bil KWAP loan: ex-director

Malaysia / 2y

AGC yet to decide on Najib’s request to drop charges of RM27 mil SRC case

Malaysia / 2y

Najib’s team slam Ramkarpal, others for not grasping facts of his case, invite televised debate

Malaysia / 2y

Najib applies for DNAA in RM27 million SRC case

Malaysia / 2y

Federal court dismisses Najib’s leave to appeal bid to lift Mareva injunction in SRC International lawsuit

2y

Najib received US$30 mil from Jho Low’s shell company in 2012: witness

Spotlight

Malaysia

After Johor, the uncomfortable question for Anwar’s critics: Were we too impatient?

By The Vibes Says

Malaysia

Network School's business licences revoked, to cease operations tomorrow

Opinion

Orang Asli in Pahang: Token gestures or genuine recognition?

Malaysia

Tuition teacher sentenced to 105 years in prison and 70 lashes for raping daughter

Malaysia

Azam Baki denies involvement in RM178.29 million contract linked to brother’s company

Malaysia

Aminuddin urges NS voters to weigh manifesto promising benefits for M40 and B40 groups

Malaysia

No need to resign, PM has absolute power if there is doubt – Ahmad Zahid

World

Gaza’s water crisis deepens as families face thirst, disease and collapsing sanitation systems

You may be interested

Malaysia

Who is Sarah? What we know about the Malaysian lawyer at the centre of the Karim Khan case

Malaysia

Anwar welcomes Andy Burnham as new UK PM, seeks stronger ties

Malaysia

PH banks on Negeri Sembilan development record as campaign heats up

Malaysia

Saifuddin: Immigration Dept on track to exceed RM5b revenue target this year

Malaysia

PRNNS: Loke: 'We must win all 11 seats to help PH form state government'

Malaysia

After Johor, the uncomfortable question for Anwar’s critics: Were we too impatient?

By The Vibes Says

Malaysia

eFishery loss will not jeopardise KWAP’s finances or pension payments - Tengku Zafrul

Malaysia

High Court to decide prosecution appeal in Papagomo sedition acquittal on July 31