Malaysia

We weren’t negligent: Prasarana, Rapid Rail in LRT crash defence

Plaintiffs at fault for injuries, failed to adhere to passenger safety protocols, both claim

Updated 3 years ago · Published on 29 May 2023 8:27PM

We weren’t negligent: Prasarana, Rapid Rail in LRT crash defence
Responding to the companies’ denials, the plaintiffs said in their reply that they will present medical reports as evidence to support their claims that the injuries suffered were indeed caused by Prasarana and Rapid Rail’s negligence. – AZIM RAHMAN/The Vibes file pic, May 29, 2023

by Arjun Mohanakrishnan

JOHOR BARU – Prasarana Malaysia Bhd (Prasarana) and Rapid Rail Sdn Bhd (Rapid Rail) have suggested that victims may be partially or entirely responsible for their injuries sustained during the Kelana Jaya LRT crash that occurred in May 2021.

Named as defendants in a suit filed by eight plaintiffs at the Kuala Lumpur High Court, Prasarana and Rapid Rail only briefly admitted that a crash did occur.

However, although the plaintiffs claimed that the crash occurred because of Prasarana and Rapid Rail’s negligence, both companies denied the allegations and asserted such claims must be proven with strong evidence.

In addition to denying negligence on their part, both companies also suggested that the plaintiffs sustained injuries after failing to stand or sit at the appropriate place in the train, not holding the straphangers, and allowing themselves to be injured.

“Additionally and/or in the alternative, the defendants plead that the injuries suffered by the plaintiffs (which must be proven with concrete evidence) is caused wholly and/or in the alternative partially by the negligence of the plaintiffs in all material times.

“Failing to stand or sit at the locations designated for passengers, failing to hold the straphangers provided by the defendants, with negligence and/or purposely caused and/or allowed themselves to experience the injuries to which they have claimed,” the statement of defence read.

Both Prasarana and Rapid Rail have requested that the court strike out the statement of claim by the plaintiffs.

Responding to the companies’ denials, the plaintiffs said in their reply that they will present medical reports as evidence to support their claims that the injuries suffered were indeed caused by Prasarana and Rapid Rail’s negligence.

Additionally, the plaintiffs also refuted the defendants claims that they were negligent and brought upon the injuries onto themselves, given that Prasarana and Rapid Rail are responsible for their passengers’ safety.  

“The plaintiffs deny the details of negligence pleaded by the defence because the accident happened during peak hours, and it is the responsibility of the defendants to ensure the plaintiffs’ safety,” the statement of reply said.

The suit was filed by Tengku Amalie Alauddin Shah, Marvena Jitol, Riezariel Haeqal, Rozita Che Rus, Ng Siow Nee, Siti Nuralliah Hashim, Nurul Athirah Mohd K. Jayabee and Muhammad Firdaus Bin Mohd Saleh on March 9.

All of the individuals were LRT passengers who claimed that they boarded the train at the KLCC station around 8pm on May 24, 2021.

All plaintiffs assert they were physically and mentally healthy prior to the accident.

In the suit, all eight individuals claimed physical injuries and other losses as a result of the crash.

Some of the injuries experienced by the victims included lacerations on the head, broken teeth, concussions, and depression, among others.

All plaintiffs are seeking both general and special damages from the court.  

However, the total amount claimed against both companies has yet to be quantified, as the plaintiffs are seeking the court’s guidance on quantifying certain claims. – The Vibes, May 29, 2023

Related News

Malaysia / 3y

Operations at six Ampang LRT stations to resume at 6am tomorrow

Malaysia / 3y

Commuters hail continuation of My50 pass for cheaper travel

Malaysia / 3y

Prasarana to take legal action over Ampang LRT disruption

Malaysia / 3y

Rapid Rail gets new target of 1 mil km without LRT, MRT disruptions by 2026

Malaysia / 3y

Prasarana employees to enjoy pay, allowance hikes

Malaysia / 3y

Six stations on Ampang-Sri Petaling LRT line closed from April 2

Spotlight

Malaysia

After Johor, the uncomfortable question for Anwar’s critics: Were we too impatient?

By The Vibes Says

Malaysia

Network School's business licences revoked, to cease operations tomorrow

Opinion

Orang Asli in Pahang: Token gestures or genuine recognition?

Malaysia

Tuition teacher sentenced to 105 years in prison and 70 lashes for raping daughter

Malaysia

Azam Baki denies involvement in RM178.29 million contract linked to brother’s company

Malaysia

Aminuddin urges NS voters to weigh manifesto promising benefits for M40 and B40 groups

Malaysia

No need to resign, PM has absolute power if there is doubt – Ahmad Zahid

World

Gaza’s water crisis deepens as families face thirst, disease and collapsing sanitation systems

You may be interested

Malaysia

Network School's business licences revoked, to cease operations tomorrow

Malaysia

Sabah does not agree to 200-litre diesel quota, forms special committee - Masidi

Malaysia

Sara Aid expands to 13,700 stores as Govt widens access for rural communities

Malaysia

KWAP’s eFishery loss triggers governance review as Anwar backs full investigation

Malaysia

Sabah seeks additional RM1.61b allocation to fund state operations and development needs

Malaysia

Azam Baki denies involvement in RM178.29 million contract linked to brother’s company

Malaysia

Mechanic sentenced to 20 years and seven lashes for rape and armed robbery of teenager

Malaysia

Saifuddin: Immigration Dept on track to exceed RM5b revenue target this year