Malaysia

CoA dismisses family’s appeal on Karuna Nithi’s death in lock-up

Suit filed same as that earlier filed in lower court in 2018, judges rule

Updated 2 years ago · Published on 19 Oct 2023 5:56PM

CoA dismisses family’s appeal on Karuna Nithi’s death in lock-up
Reading out the decision, Justice Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali says while the second suit tried a different approach by seeking relief over alleged contravention of fundamental rights under the federal constitution, the said suit still in essence was seeking compensation from the government over Karuna Nithi’s death. – SYEDA IMRAN/The Vibes file pic, October 19, 2023

PUTRAJAYA – The Court of Appeal today rejected a family’s appeal to set aside the high court’s decision which dismissed their legal action against the government over a police detainee P. Karuna Nithi’s death in 2013.

A three-member bench comprising CoA judges Datuk S. Nantha Balan, Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali and Datuk Choo Kah Sing, in a unanimous decision said that the originating summons by the family is the same as the one earlier filed at the Seremban High Court in 2018.

In February last year, the Kuala Lumpur High Court dismissed the family’s second suit, which was filed in 2021.

Reading out the decision, Justice Nazlan said while the second suit tried a different approach by seeking relief over alleged contravention of fundamental rights under the federal constitution, the said suit still in essence was seeking compensation from the government over Karuna Nithi’s death.

“In our judgment, while the cause of action for the second suit appears different from the first legal action, it is inaccurate to say that the current suit would not be a matter of the earlier suit.

“Given the similarity of the two actions, the appellants (family) could have included the present claim in the earlier suit but they failed to do so. 

“The court found that Section 2(a) of the Public Authorities Protection Act is not ultra vires Article 8 of the federal constitution.

“Therefore, we dismiss the appeal with no order as to cost,” he said adding that the legal principle of res judicata comes into effect in this case.

Res judicata is a legal maxim meaning a thing or matter that has been finally juridically decided on its merits and cannot be litigated again between the same parties.

Karuna Nithi’s family was represented by counsel T. Manoharan while senior federal counsel Donald Joseph Franklin represented the 16 respondents including policemen and the government.

Karuna Nithi’s widow R. Kaliamah and her two sons K. Yugesh Varan and K. Kisho Kumar filed the originating summons on January 26, 2021 against 16 defendants including 14 policemen and the government to compensate for Karuna Nithi’s death. 

Karuna Nithi was arrested on May 28, 2013 but died in custody on June 1, 2013, with 49 fresh injuries on his body.

In January 2015, the coroner’s open verdict ruled that Karuna Nithi’s death was due to several factors, including beatings by police as well as other inmates, resulting in him sustaining the 49 injuries.

Following an inquest, the family filed a suit for negligence and assault against the defendants for causing the death of the deceased at the high court in Seremban on January 25, 2018. 

However, the court dismissed the family’s suit on grounds that it was filed out of time in 2018, which was far longer than three years after Karuna Nithi’s death in custody in 2013. The CoA also maintained the decision.

The Federal Court in December 2020 also dismissed the family’s appeal on grounds that the suit was time barred under Section 2(a) PAPA, as cause of action should start from the date of the death of the deceased and not from the date of the inquest verdict. – Bernama, October 19, 2023

Related News

Malaysia / 2mth

Court of Appeal: Emergency proclamations beyond judicial review

Malaysia / 4mth

Family takes issue of government responsibility in Altantuya's death to Federal Court

Malaysia / 6mth

Court of Appeal rejects Najib’s bid to reinstate RM1.9m civil suit against Tommy Thomas

Malaysia / 1y

Court dismisses ex-AG special officer’s appeal in lawsuit against Rewcastle-Brown

Malaysia / 2y

Muhyiddin files for leave to review Court of Appeal ruling reinstating power abuse charges

Malaysia / 2y

Court of Appeal upholds death sentence in Kevin Morais murder

Spotlight

Malaysia

After Johor, the uncomfortable question for Anwar’s critics: Were we too impatient?

By The Vibes Says

Malaysia

Network School's business licences revoked, to cease operations tomorrow

Opinion

Orang Asli in Pahang: Token gestures or genuine recognition?

Malaysia

Tuition teacher sentenced to 105 years in prison and 70 lashes for raping daughter

Malaysia

Azam Baki denies involvement in RM178.29 million contract linked to brother’s company

Malaysia

Aminuddin urges NS voters to weigh manifesto promising benefits for M40 and B40 groups

Malaysia

No need to resign, PM has absolute power if there is doubt – Ahmad Zahid

World

Gaza’s water crisis deepens as families face thirst, disease and collapsing sanitation systems

You may be interested

Malaysia

eFishery loss will not jeopardise KWAP’s finances or pension payments - Tengku Zafrul

Malaysia

No need to resign, PM has absolute power if there is doubt – Ahmad Zahid

Malaysia

Saifuddin: Immigration Dept on track to exceed RM5b revenue target this year

Malaysia

High Court to decide prosecution appeal in Papagomo sedition acquittal on July 31

Malaysia

Activist charged over alleged desecration of Hindu sacred object at Langkawi temple site

Malaysia

Police station chief suspended for allegedly accepting RM500 bribe

Malaysia

Man killed in hit-and-run crash while installing party flags in Rantau

Malaysia

AI Governance Bill to be tabled in Parliament after ministry, agency consultations