Malaysia

Bar fails in bid to challenge Zahid DNAA

High Court orders plaintiff to pay RM10,000 in costs to the attorney-general.

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 27 Jun 2024 12:47PM

Bar fails in bid to challenge Zahid DNAA
The Malaysian Bar has failed to initiate a judicial review to challenge Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi's discharge not amounting to an acquittal in the Yayasan Akal Budi corruption case. – Wikipedia pic, June 27, 2024.

THE Malaysian Bar failed to initiate a judicial review to challenge Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi's discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) in the Yayasan Akal Budi corruption case.

The decision was delivered by High Court judge Datuk Amarjeet Singh Serjit Singh, who held that the Bar did not fulfil the threshold requirement under Section 96 of the Courts of Judicature Act (CJA) for a judicial review. 

The Bar Council, in an application filed on December 2 last year, named the attorney-general (AG) and the deputy prime minister as respondents in its application for the DNAA to be rescinded.

The Bar said the AG’s decision was “unreasonable and tainted with irrationality”, and sought a mandamus order to compel the AG to disclose all information it had relied on and the basis of his decision to seek the conditional discharge.

The Kuala Lumpur High Court also dismissed the Bar's application, filed under Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution, read with Section 84 of the CJA, to refer several constitutional questions to the apex court for determination.

Senior federal counsels Ahmad Hanir Hambaly and Shamsul Bolhassan appeared for the AGC while Datuk Hisyam Teh Poh Teik, Hamidi Mohd Noh and Guok Ngek Seong represented Zahid.

Former Malaysian Bar president Steven Thiru and Abhilaash Subramaniam were the lawyers for the Malaysian Bar.

Amarjeet ordered the Bar to pay RM10,000 in costs to the AG, who is one of the respondents named in the case. The other respondent is Zahid.

In September last year, Zahid was granted a DNAA on all 47 of his corruption, criminal breach of trust and money-laundering charges.

The Kuala Lumpur High Court granted the DNAA sought by deputy public prosecutor Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar.

When a court grants a DNAA, it means that the accused is discharged from the current charges without being acquitted of them.

The case is put on hold or suspended, but the prosecution has the option to refile the charges or reinstate the case at a later time if new evidence or circumstances warrant it. – June 27, 2024

Spotlight

Malaysia

Bersatu-PH tie-up a possibility as coalition seeks Malay support, analyst says

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Woman molested on her way home from work (video)

Malaysia

Court allows Daim's daughter to permanently keep passport

Malaysia

Santiago pokes holes in data centre hype, asks: Who really benefits?

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Jeweller vows to pursue Rosmah until ‘every penny’ is recovered as RM67.5m battle enters enforcement phase

Malaysia

Ambulance carrying two injured men crashes en route to hospital after MPV collision in Besut

Malaysia

Man blames 'lack of love' for sexual assault on teens

Business

BNM's OPR to stay at 2.75 pcent in 2026 amid strong domestic demand - Kenanga IB

Malaysia

Missing jewellery: Rosmah ordered to pay RM67.5 million

You may be interested

Malaysia

Ministry backs nationwide marriage age reform, says states hold final authority

Malaysia

UMNO youth chief challenges AG over Facebook prosecution in High Court review

Malaysia

Shop assistant pleads guilty to machete attack on father and arson of family vehicles

Malaysia

PN leadership dispute deepens as chairman stresses coalition built on consensus

Malaysia

Fahmi rebukes PKR MP for bypassing party channels after central leadership exit

Malaysia

PAS confirms meeting with Hamzah-led RESET group, details to be announced in Kelantan tomorrow

Malaysia

J-KOM files police report against Albert Tei over repeated protests at Comms Ministry

Malaysia

Police dismiss claims of student attack on teacher in Kuala Kangsar