Malaysia

Taman Rimba Kiara ruling opens floodgates to challenges by every Tom, Dick and Harry: KL mayor

Development in capital risks coming to standstill, says City Hall official in sworn affidavit

Updated 2 years ago · Published on 27 Feb 2021 2:00PM

Taman Rimba Kiara ruling opens floodgates to challenges by every Tom, Dick and Harry: KL mayor
The development planned in Taman Rimba Kiara has seen opposition by, among others, residents of longhouses in the area. – The Vibes file pic, February 27, 2021

by Arjun Mohanakrishnan

KUALA LUMPUR – The Kuala Lumpur mayor is seeking to reverse the Court of Appeal’s decision quashing City Hall’s development order in Taman Rimba Kiara, arguing that the ruling will result in stunted projects in the capital.

In a sworn affidavit, Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) Legal and Prosecution Department deputy director Izmah Nor Idris said the city’s development will come to a standstill if everyone claiming to be adversely affected by decisions to grant planning permissions could put forth challenges.

“Everyone, in one way or another, would be affected by any proposed development.”

The reasoning behind this is a concept called “locus standi”, which roughly translates to someone’s right to bring an action to court.

Given that there are hundreds of developments in Kuala Lumpur, it is important for the Federal Court to decide who has the right to initiate action against DBKL or Mayor Datuk Mahadi Che Ngah over the granting of planning permissions.

Last month, the Court of Appeal declared the Taman Rimba Kiara development order granted by DBKL null and void after various parties, including the Taman Tun Dr Ismail Residents’ Association, initiated a judicial review application.

The case, now in its sixth year, involves a challenge against the development of nine apartment blocks. In 2018, residents lost their fight in the high court.

The affidavit on behalf of the mayor and DBKL said under Rule 5 of the Planning (Development) Rules 1970, only registered owners of adjoining land can object to proposed developments.

The Court of Appeal previously decided that Rule 5 requires those on adjoining land to be notified and heard at the time planning permissions are under consideration.

According to an affidavit on behalf of KL Mayor Datuk Mahadi Che Ngah and City Hall, under Rule 5 of the Planning (Development) Rules 1970, only registered owners of adjoining land can object to proposed developments. – Wilayahku pic, February 27, 2021
According to an affidavit on behalf of KL Mayor Datuk Mahadi Che Ngah and City Hall, under Rule 5 of the Planning (Development) Rules 1970, only registered owners of adjoining land can object to proposed developments. – Wilayahku pic, February 27, 2021

However, the rule is not relevant when it comes to those who can initiate a judicial review application, said the affidavit.

The applicant only needs to show that they are adversely affected by the decision.

“Without a specific definition given to the persons who can object, it will be practically impossible for the applicant to carry out its tasks to hear the objections of the persons who are qualified,” said the affidavit.

This is why, according to the mayor, the matter of locus standi must be determined. 

It was reported that Yayasan Wilayah Persekutuan and developer Memang Perkasa Sdn Bhd, along with DBKL and a group representing longhouses in Taman Rimba Kiara, have filed applications for leave at the Federal Court.

The bid seeks to challenge the appellate court’s ruling favouring TTDI residents.

A lawyer representing the TTDI residents said the parties earlier this week filed four leave applications. – The Vibes, February 27, 2021

Related News

Malaysia / 2w

Plaza Rakyat saga drags on as developer asks to delay project start date

Opinion / 4w

Federal Territories Ministry: my plea on KLLP 2040 – Saleh Mohammed

Malaysia / 6mth

Budget 2024: RM110 million to upgrade hawker centres, public markets

Malaysia / 7mth

DBKL shutters Bukit Bintang shop after dancers in skimpy outfits go viral

Opinion / 7mth

Dialogue needed on 25% entertainment tax’s impact on live events – Alife

Malaysia / 9mth

Enforce draft KL Structure Plan before year’s end, PM tells DBKL

Spotlight

Malaysia

Perlis MB to 'leave it to MACC to investigate my son'

By Ian McIntyre

Malaysia

Not practical to ban 24-hour restaurants, says lawmaker

By Noel Achariam

Malaysia

Youth not interested in joining political parties, study shows

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Navy reveals names of 10 killed in helicopter collision in Perak

Malaysia

10 years’ jail for woman who threw hot water at Down syndrome man

Malaysia

Defence Ministry opens probe into deadly helicopter crash

You may be interested

Malaysia

Navy reveals names of 10 killed in helicopter collision in Perak

Malaysia

Little girl calls for naval mother at funeral

Malaysia

Youth not interested in joining political parties, study shows

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Sabah does not object to citizenship for migrants with govt-issued documents

Malaysia

KLIA shooting suspect pleads not guilty to 7 charges

Malaysia

CAAM revokes MYAirline’s air operator certificate

Malaysia

Not practical to ban 24-hour restaurants, says lawmaker

By Noel Achariam

Malaysia

Talks under way to build Forest City casino