Malaysia

Pakatan echoes CJ’s sentiments of criticism on judiciary going overboard 

Opposition reminds govt of MoU clause on judicial freedom and independence  

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 28 Apr 2022 10:49AM

Pakatan echoes CJ’s sentiments of criticism on judiciary going overboard 
A statement issued by the Pakatan Harapan presidential council reminds the current government of the contents in the memorandum of understanding, which highlights the integrity and sanctity of the judiciary. – The Vibes file pic, April 28, 2022

KUALA LUMPUR – Pakatan Harapan (PH) leaders today echoed sentiments expressed by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat on recent accusations against the judiciary going overboard. 

A statement issued by the PH presidential council said the judiciary must be respected, remain independent, and never undermined by the government and its agencies. 

The committee also reminded the current government of the contents in the memorandum of understanding (MoU), which highlights the integrity and sanctity of the judiciary. 

“Hence, PH fully supports and will defend the freedom of the judiciary. 

“We urge the federal government to ensure it continues implementing the contents of the MoU by ensuring that enforcement agencies do not violate the federal constitution and always respect the principle of judicial independence.”

The statement was signed by PKR president Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Amanah chief Mohamad Sabu, DAP secretary-general Anthony Loke, and United Progressive Kinabalu Organisation’s Datuk Seri Wilfred Madius Tangau. 

The committee reiterated how the judiciary must at all times remain independent to serve as the backbone to the country’s rule of law, and ensure the existence of a democratic system that is trusted and accepted by the people. 

This comes in response to reports of Court of Appeal judge Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali being investigated by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) over allegations he was the recipient of unexplained wealth.

The investigation has attracted criticism from politicians and activists, who accused the MACC of being a political tool and for unsettling the legal and judicial fraternities. – The Vibes, April 28, 2022  

Related News

Malaysia / 2mth

Is reputation worth so much more than a person’s life?

Malaysia / 9mth

Judiciary to set up special High Court for corruption cases

Malaysia / 1y

Izzah marches with lawyers, calls for independent tribunal to set up

Opinion / 1y

A century of Mahathir: A Malaysian titan turns 100

Opinion / 1y

Anwar Ibrahim and a nation in transition

Opinion / 1y

Should we challenge the extension of the judiciary under article 125 of the Federal constitution?

Spotlight

Malaysia

Asyraf denies Najib ready to pay RM50m fine for house arrest

Malaysia

Malaysia’s average household size falls to 3.8 people

Malaysia

Najib's former wife Tengku Puteri Zainah in critical condition in ICU

Malaysia

More than 117,000 harmful online posts removed as government steps up enforcement

Malaysia

1,000 families receive Deepavali aid to ensure no one misses festive celebrations

Malaysia

Mother, daughter fined RM500 each for obstructing Muar council enforcement officers

Malaysia

Kelantan records 1,446 khalwat cases in three years

Malaysia

Negeri’s deposed Undang, chieftains fail to stop committal proceedings

You may be interested

Malaysia

RM10.7b financing reaches 300,000 entrepreneurs as govt steps up support for small traders

Malaysia

Parents can access info on more than 10,000 schools with SekolahKu portal

Malaysia

IGP: Malaysia records 204,127 crime cases, falls short of projected threshold by 29.6%

Malaysia

Border agencies seize RM256m in drugs and smuggled goods in 10-month crackdown

Malaysia

AGC orders further police probe into allegations against Negeri Sembilan MB

Malaysia

Malaysia’s average household size falls to 3.8 people

Malaysia

Over 630k Indian recipients to benefit from RM1.1b STR payout ahead of Deepavali

Malaysia

Government shields households from data centre-driven utility costs