World

US bans Xinjiang imports, forcing companies to navigate sticky diplomacy

Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act sets its sights on three products in particular

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 24 Dec 2021 10:00AM

US bans Xinjiang imports, forcing companies to navigate sticky diplomacy
In a rare bipartisan move, the Senate last week unanimously voted to make the United States the first country to ban virtually all imports from Xinjiang, which is one of the world’s major producers of cotton. – AFP pic, December 24, 2021

WASHINGTON – President Joe Biden signed a law Thursday virtually banning all imports from the Chinese region of Xinjiang in response to concerns over forced labour, as US companies find themselves caught in the diplomatic fray.

The bill, which was approved by Congress last week, bans the import of all goods from the region unless companies offer verifiable proof that production did not involve forced labour.

The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act sets its sights on three products in particular: cotton, of which Xinjiang is one of the world’s major producers; tomatoes; and polysilicon, a material used to produce solar panels.

In a rare bipartisan move, the Senate last week unanimously voted to make the United States the first country to ban virtually all imports from the region.

The vote came despite lobbying by US firms, many of which are heavily dependent on Chinese suppliers and already facing massive disruption due to trade disturbances caused by the coronavirus pandemic.

The law gives the government “new tools to prevent goods made with forced labour in Xinjiang from entering US markets and to further promote accountability for persons and entities responsible for these abuses”, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a statement, calling on China to end “genocide and crimes against humanity”.

The law also requires the US president to impose sanctions on Chinese officials responsible for human rights abuses in the region.

An estimated 20% of garments imported into the US each year include some cotton from Xinjiang.

Rights experts, witnesses and the US government say more than one million Uyghurs and other Turkic-speaking Muslims are incarcerated in camps in an effort to root out their Islamic cultural traditions and forcibly assimilate them into China’s Han majority.

Washington has described the campaign as genocide.

‘Weaponising’ of markets 

Republican opposition has criticised the White House for slow movement on the matter.

On Thursday, White House press secretary Jen Psaki was asked about the relative discretion with which Biden signed the text, despite having made countering China a major axis of his foreign policy.

The White House released only a photo of the signing on Twitter, while Biden signed a law – with cameras rolling – intended to support research against a rare neurodegenerative disease.

Sometimes he signs bills “off camera, sometimes on camera. We support the bill and obviously we’ve been leading the effort in the world to call out human rights abuses”, Psaki said.

Washington has already hit some Chinese officials and businesses with sanctions and announced a diplomatic boycott of the Beijing Olympics in protest of the conditions in Xinjiang.

Beijing describes the sites as vocational training centres and says it is seeking to reduce the allure of radical Islam following deadly attacks.

Implementation of the law and the US offensive against certain Chinese economic interests is causing friction for some companies, such as semiconductor giant Intel, which on Thursday issued an apology over a letter to its suppliers.

In the wake of the US bill’s passage in the Senate, the company had asked suppliers to avoid sourcing in the region.

Following public outcry in China, the chipmaker expressed its regret for the comments in a statement posted on Weibo, the Chinese social media platform.

“We believe the private sector and the international community should oppose the PRC’s weaponising of its markets to stifle support for human rights,” Psaki said, using an acronym for the People’s Republic of China.

“We also think that American companies should never feel the need to apologise for standing up for fundamental human rights or posing repression,” she added. – AFP, December 24, 2021

Related News

Opinion / 6d

Will the AI bubble burst?

Events / 1w

Shanghai trade fair returns to KL with 500 exhibitors in November

Malaysia / 1mth

PM Anwar loses beloved elder brother; Idrus Ibrahim passes away

Malaysia / 1mth

Anwar asks Loke to reconsider resignation over Najib pardon

Opinion / 1mth

Foreign influence, covert activities within Malaysian politics and society

Malaysia / 2mth

Jokowi calls on global institutions to meet  needs growing, interconnected world

Spotlight

Opinion

Can Najib break Madani?

World

Trump offers UFC CEO the position of Press Secretary

Malaysia

Building a great nation begins with happy families, says Anwar

Malaysia

Anwar should sack BN ministers who are not aligned with him – Muhyiddin

Malaysia

AGC rejects claims of defying King’s decree on Najib

Malaysia

Deepavali: Selangor Sultan calls on Malaysians to strengthen unity, reject hatred

Malaysia

If there were still obstacles, why accept the RM50m payment, asks Najib’s daughter

Malaysia

Where did UMNO's RM50 million payment for Najib's release come from?

By The Vibes Says

You may be interested

World

Leader of a deviant sect sentenced to 200 years in prison for killing 190 children

World

US sanctions 45 entities linked to Cambodia cybercrime syndicate

World

Trump says Washington 'doing very well' with Tehran as nuclear talks continue

World

Death toll from Russian strike on Ukraine aid distribution point rises to 53

World

Six dead, 16 injured in shooting incident in southern Poland

World

Trump offers UFC CEO the position of Press Secretary