Malaysia

Port Dickson name change: ‘There are more important things to do’ – says minister

"From a tourism perspective, in my opinion, changing the name is unnecessary. There are many more important things that can be done," said Tiong.

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 23 Sep 2025 9:26AM

Port Dickson name change: ‘There are more important things to do’ – says minister
Tiong said it was up to the state government to evaluate the proposal - September 23, 2025

THE proposal by several non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to change the name of some popular destinations in the country, including Port Dickson would likely affect tourist arrivals in that area.

Minister of Tourism, Arts and Culture, Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing said a new name would confuse tourists, especially from abroad, because they would assume it was a new destination, when it had actually been around for a long time.

According to him, there were many other more important things that needed to be given attention than changing the names of certain destinations.

"From a tourism perspective, in my opinion, changing the name is unnecessary. There are many more important things that can be done.

"Later, tourists from foreign countries will be confused because they would think it is a new destination and many not be interested in going there, not realising it is actually their old favourite," he told reporters in Seremban as reported by Sinar Harian.

He was commenting on the proposal of several NGOs to change the names of some tourism destinations, including Port Dickson to eliminate the names of colonial relics.

However, Tiong said it was up to the state government to evaluate the proposal and if there was no need, the existing name should be retained.

"Although we can announce the name change on social media, not everyone will read it," he said.

Earlier Negeri Sembilan Menteri Besar, Datuk Seri Aminuddin Harun, slammed the NGOs who were allegedly trying to change the name of Port Dickson to Pantai Dermaga to erase the identity of the British colonial legacy.

He reportedly said that the parties concerned should be open to the name Port Dickson which has its own identity and is already well known. - September 23, 2025

Related News

Places / 2w

LOT Polish Airlines to bring in more tourists to Penang from November

Malaysia / 1mth

The potential for a redevelopment of Port Dickson

Events / 2mth

‘Fall in Love with Penang’ campaign launched to woo Malaysians to the state

Events / 2mth

AEON, Weixin Pay to provide Chinese travellers a greater seamless payment experience

Malaysia / 2mth

Thai border town Dan Nok fades as new border crossing diverts Malaysian traffic

Malaysia / 2mth

Penang orders owners, operators of heritage shophouses to conduct regular inspections

Spotlight

Malaysia

Bersama suspends Nik Nazmi from party activities for three months

Malaysia

‘We have better things to do than orchestrate khalwat raids’ - Amirudin

Malaysia

Social media posts ‘emerge’- defending Ismail after Tuanku Muhriz’s public rebuke

World

Trump’s Muhammad joke about Iran presidency falls flat at Georgia rally

Health

Haze can cause life-threatening lung inflammation in cats and dogs, vet warns

World

Australia detects deadly H5N1 bird flu on Macquarie Island, threatening elephant seals

Malaysia

Agong warns against using social media to spread hatred, insult others

Malaysia

Nik Nazmi acknowledges he is the individual detained by JAIS

You may be interested

Malaysia

King honours Malaysian Armed Forces at 93rd anniversary banquet

Malaysia

DAP lawmakers’ risk being dropped as party tightens KPI checks ahead of GE16

Malaysia

PKR restructures Sarawak leadership to strengthen election machinery

Malaysia

Policeman seriously injured in machete attack during anti-drug raid in Kelantan

Malaysia

Man found dead with 70 per cent burns beside Johor railway tracks

Malaysia

Ayob Khan alleges terror recruiters are targeting Malaysian children through Roblox

Malaysia

UM denies disciplinary action against student over Najib, Tabung Haji remarks

Malaysia

Disabled workers’ public sector representation must more than triple by 2030