AS the Pelangai by-election in Pahang approaches, the political arena in Malaysia is once again witnessing familiar tactics that have been employed in previous campaigns. The battle between Barisan Nasional (BN) and Perikatan Nasional (PN) is intensifying and lines are being drawn, with religion becoming a prominent theme.
However, the time has come for a shift in campaign strategies, where there should be a renewed focus on substantive issues, particularly the economy and the cost of living.
Recent events have brought the role of religion in politics to the forefront of the campaign. The uproar over Ipoh Timor MP Howard Lee’s statement for allegedly providing his own interpretations of Quranic verses, has raised questions about the use of religious sentiments to sway voters. This episode highlights the divisive nature of such tactics.
During a recent event in Pelangai, Kedah Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Muhammad Sanusi Md Nor pointed to Lee’s alleged interpretation of a Quranic verse on TikTok as an example of BN and Pakatan Harapan’s purported liberalism. Sanusi urged voters in Pelangai to reject these two parties, claiming that doing so would “stop this sin” and prevent them from liberalising everything.
However, the danger of using religion as a political tool lies in its potential to distract from genuine problems faced by Malaysians.
While religious harmony is crucial, it should not overshadow pressing economic concerns. Voters should be wary of campaigns that prioritise divisive rhetoric over concrete plans to address economic disparities, job opportunities, and income inequality.
Leaders from the PN coalition must recognise that, in a rapidly changing global landscape, economic stability and growth are paramount. They should shift their campaign focus towards substantive issues, demonstrating their capability to improve the nation’s financial stability and create meaningful job opportunities.
It is time for political campaigns in Malaysia to evolve and focus on providing real solutions to the challenges faced by the people. A campaign centred on economic issues, job creation, and social welfare will not only demonstrate the seriousness of the PN coalition but also serve the best interests of the Malaysian people.
Voters in Pelangai and across Malaysia should demand more from their political leaders. They should insist on campaigns that provide substantive solutions to the challenges they face daily. By doing so, they can move beyond divisive religious rhetoric and instead build a stronger, more inclusive future for Malaysia.
The Pelangai by-election offers an opportunity for a change in campaign dynamics. The time has come for leaders, particularly those from the PN coalition, to focus on substantive issues like the economy. By doing so, they can prove their capability to lead the states under their rule more effectively and address the real concerns of the people.
Furthermore, a campaign centred on economic issues would align with the aspirations of Malaysians for a brighter future. We should not forget the lessons learned from the Covid-19 pandemic. It had highlighted the importance of a resilient healthcare system, social safety nets, and a strong economy.
Likewise, politicians should talk about these issues and not fall back on populist statements that will rile up the people but do nothing to improve the well-being of the people.
We are all concerned about job security, rising living costs, and access to quality education and healthcare. The PH-BN and PN coalitions have the opportunity to address these concerns head-on and present comprehensive policies that provide real solutions.
It is worth noting that focusing on substantive campaign issues not only benefits the electorate but also elevates the political discourse in Malaysia. By engaging in constructive debates on economic policies, infrastructure development, and social welfare, political leaders can foster more informed and engaged voters. Ultimately, the Pelangai by-election should serve as a catalyst for change, encouraging politicians to move away from divisive tactics and toward a more responsible and substantive approach to governance. – The Vibes, September 24, 2023
