Education

Proposal to classify subsidies based on family income is regressive, says MCA youth

MCA youth said the proposal requires thorough guidelines on its implementation to prevent unnecessary conflicts and controversies.

Updated 2 years ago · Published on 02 Oct 2024 9:55AM

Proposal to classify subsidies based on family income is regressive, says MCA youth
Saw said the essence of education should aim to bridge disparities among students. - October 2, 2024

THE proposal to cut education subsidies for wealthy children in Budget 2025 to assist poorer groups appears reasonable as it shows the government’s efforts to ensure targeted subsidies reach those genuinely in need. 

However, MCA youth today said the proposal requires thorough guidelines on its implementation to prevent unnecessary conflicts and controversies.

Its secretary-general Saw Yee Fung said the current education system does not categorise schools based on household income. 

“Concerns grow as to how Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim intends to define and execute the subsidy withdrawal for families determined to be “ultra rich.” 

“How will the government identify which families are "ultra-rich" to revoke their subsidies?,” she asked.

She said the essence of education should aim to bridge disparities among students. 

Since 2018, she said the Ministry of Education has moved away from classifying students based on grades, to prevent children from being labelled from an early age. 

“Hence, the premier’s proposal to classify subsidies based on family income is regressive. 

“Using income to categorise students creates divisions between the 'wealthy' and the 'poor,' which contradicts the spirit and essence of education,”.

While acknowledging the government's aspiration to assist vulnerable groups, Saw said the lack of details in yesterday’s announcement might foster resentment and 'class envy' sentiments. 

She said this could exacerbate social tensions and contravene the principle of education enabling inclusiveness. 

“We understand the government's challenges on financial allocation, but we must avoid adopting any anti-wealth sentiments in official discourse or policies. 

“Such attitudes can skewer society’s view of wealth as a 'crime,' ultimately undermining social cohesion in the long run. 

“The government wields a duty to promote fairness and justice, not to create new conflicts in society,” she added. - October 2, 2024

Related News

Opinion / 3w

Time to abolish fuel subsidies and tolls?

Malaysia / 1mth

Fuel subsidies or cash aid? Nik Nazmi poll fuels debate

Malaysia / 1mth

PM to bring Felda forensic audit proposal to Cabinet

Malaysia / 2mth

Targeted diesel subsidy system improvements expected in ‘1 to 2 months’

Opinion / 3mth

Why Bersama is not Malaysia’s best hope

Malaysia / 4mth

PM Anwar dismisses talk of fuel price hikes

Spotlight

Malaysia

Papagomo acquitted for second time in sedition case over government, Israel claims

Malaysia

ECRL fares start at RM60, with 50% discounts for children, seniors and OKU

Malaysia

DKU seeks court action against Ismail, 16 others over Negeri Sembilan royal dispute

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Kampung Manis: Dreams of 227 families to own replacement homes draw closer

Malaysia

Fadhlina takes legal action over video of 2023 Parliament speech

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Civil servants urged to turn Selangor Sultan’s anti-graft message into action

Malaysia

Animal welfare group urges probe into alleged sexual abuse of cat in viral video

Malaysia

Macron appeals for calm after France riots: 2,400 arrested, nearly 1,000 officers injured

Malaysia

Malaysia renews offer to help Indonesia fight fires