Education

Proposal to classify subsidies based on family income is regressive, says MCA youth

MCA youth said the proposal requires thorough guidelines on its implementation to prevent unnecessary conflicts and controversies.

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 02 Oct 2024 9:55AM

Proposal to classify subsidies based on family income is regressive, says MCA youth
Saw said the essence of education should aim to bridge disparities among students. - October 2, 2024

THE proposal to cut education subsidies for wealthy children in Budget 2025 to assist poorer groups appears reasonable as it shows the government’s efforts to ensure targeted subsidies reach those genuinely in need. 

However, MCA youth today said the proposal requires thorough guidelines on its implementation to prevent unnecessary conflicts and controversies.

Its secretary-general Saw Yee Fung said the current education system does not categorise schools based on household income. 

“Concerns grow as to how Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim intends to define and execute the subsidy withdrawal for families determined to be “ultra rich.” 

“How will the government identify which families are "ultra-rich" to revoke their subsidies?,” she asked.

She said the essence of education should aim to bridge disparities among students. 

Since 2018, she said the Ministry of Education has moved away from classifying students based on grades, to prevent children from being labelled from an early age. 

“Hence, the premier’s proposal to classify subsidies based on family income is regressive. 

“Using income to categorise students creates divisions between the 'wealthy' and the 'poor,' which contradicts the spirit and essence of education,”.

While acknowledging the government's aspiration to assist vulnerable groups, Saw said the lack of details in yesterday’s announcement might foster resentment and 'class envy' sentiments. 

She said this could exacerbate social tensions and contravene the principle of education enabling inclusiveness. 

“We understand the government's challenges on financial allocation, but we must avoid adopting any anti-wealth sentiments in official discourse or policies. 

“Such attitudes can skewer society’s view of wealth as a 'crime,' ultimately undermining social cohesion in the long run. 

“The government wields a duty to promote fairness and justice, not to create new conflicts in society,” she added. - October 2, 2024

Related News

Malaysia / 1w

PM to bring Felda forensic audit proposal to Cabinet

Malaysia / 2w

Targeted diesel subsidy system improvements expected in ‘1 to 2 months’

Opinion / 2mth

Why Bersama is not Malaysia’s best hope

Malaysia / 2mth

PM Anwar dismisses talk of fuel price hikes

Opinion / 3mth

Should petrol subsidies be removed and the savings redistributed to the poor?

Malaysia / 3mth

What matters: Policies that truly understand the rakyat

Spotlight

Malaysia

Puteri Umno distances itself from viral Threads post

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

MACC drops orange detention attire for court remand cases after PM’s call

World

Man jailed six years for keeping Indonesian woman as slave in Melbourne home

Malaysia

Emergency declared in Serian as haze reaches hazardous levels (UPDATED)

Malaysia

Haze in Serian enters emergency phase

Malaysia

Death sentence for deaf, mute man who killed family of four upheld

Malaysia

Retired army officer with Datuk title charged with alleged sexual assault of golf caddie

Heritage

Penang first state to recognise Hungry Ghost Festival, cemeteries as heritage

You may be interested

Education

New York bans AI use among nearly 600,000 public school pupils