Malaysia

Artificial intelligence in M’sian courts sends shivers, but is human touch really lost?

Judges still need to consider aggravating, mitigating factors when meting out punishment

Updated 2 years ago · Published on 31 Jul 2021 8:00AM

Artificial intelligence in M’sian courts sends shivers, but is human touch really lost?
Those who welcome the implementation of artificial intelligence justice systems in courts of law say the technology will merely help inform proceedings of the judicial trend in sentencing for a particular offence, the same way prosecutors already do. – Freepik pic, July 31, 2021

by Arjun Mohanakrishnan

KUALA LUMPUR – Will Malaysia be seeing our courts use artificial intelligence (AI) in meting out punishments on individuals in criminal cases in the very near future?

Taken aback by the Federal Court Chief Registrar Office’s recent announcement on the matter, the Malaysian Bar immediately expressed concern over the fantastic scenario, with several lawyers also coming forward to air their fears.

The registrar’s office had said in a statement on July 22 that the guideline for sentencing using AI for the internal use of the session court judges and magistrates in the peninsula would be implemented this month.

It said that the guidelines are intended only as a “quick guide and reference” for sessions court judges or magistrates when deciding on the sentencing of a case.

The usage of the AI technology sentencing guidelines involve lower courts handing out punishments for the guilty party. What troubles certain legal practitioners is that the human touch would then be lost when delivering judgment.

Additionally, the Malaysian Bar’s resistance towards the use of AI is exacerbated by the fact that it has not received the guidelines and thus, lost the opportunity to garner feedback from criminal lawyers.

However, those who welcome the move said that despite AI coming into play, sentencing must still be guided by existing legal provisions.

Courts are bound by the Criminal Procedure Code, which shapes judges’ roles in considering mitigating and aggravating factors in any case, says criminal lawyer Daniel Annamalai. – vkas.my pic, July 31, 2021
Courts are bound by the Criminal Procedure Code, which shapes judges’ roles in considering mitigating and aggravating factors in any case, says criminal lawyer Daniel Annamalai. – vkas.my pic, July 31, 2021

Criminal lawyer Daniel Annamalai said that the court must follow Section 173(b), Section 173(m)(ii), and Section 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which provides that any guilty person must be sentenced according to law.

This meaning of “sentenced according to law”, Daniel said, has been explained by judges in case law.

“In Jafa Bin Daud (1981), the term ‘sentenced according to law’ means that punishment must be within the ambit of the punishable section, and passed according to other judicial principles.

“Basically, if an offence states that jail term can’t exceed five years, punishment can only be within that amount. Meanwhile, the other judicial principles would refer to aggravating and mitigating factors,” Daniel told The Vibes.

Aggravating factors are usually reasons put forth by the prosecution to push for a harsher sentence while mitigating factors are presented by the defence to convince the court to award lighter sentences.

Judges would have to consider these factors when meting out sentences.

The court will not be bound to an artificial intelligence-suggested sentence in any way, and it remains up to the judge’s discretion, says criminal lawyer Purshotaman Puvanendran. – File pic, July 31, 2021
The court will not be bound to an artificial intelligence-suggested sentence in any way, and it remains up to the judge’s discretion, says criminal lawyer Purshotaman Puvanendran. – File pic, July 31, 2021

‘Judges still maintain discretion, power’

According to criminal lawyer Purshotaman Puvanendran, AI will not change the fact that consideration on these factors must still be given by judges during sentencing.

“The introduction of AI as a quick guide and reference for sessions court judges and magistrates is a welcome change as it would mean that the judges are given a quick guide in real time.

“This, in my view, is no different than the usual practice by the prosecution, which would submit to the court the judicial trend in sentencing for a particular offence as part of their aggravating factors.”

Purshotaman said that the introduction of this new technology would merely make the process instantaneous with the provision of raw data based on judicial trends from the past.

He emphasised that this does not, in any way, take discretion and power away from judges, nor would it bind the court to sentence a person in a particular way.

“In other words, the power to sentence according to the law, according to the Criminal Procedure Code, still lies with the court and not any machinery,” Purshotaman said.

He added that although it is understandable for lawyers in the peninsula to be uncomfortable with this move since the practical aspects of AI technology are unknown, it must be noted that Sabah and Sarawak have been using the system since last year.

In its statement, the Federal Court Chief Registrar’s Office said the implementation of the AI system would be done in three phases.

It is understood that the system was implemented at the Kuala Lumpur and Shah Alam magistrates’ and sessions courts from July 23 for 20 offences, including physical and sexual assault, property theft, drug possession, and traffic violations.

The second phase of the AI system will be implemented from August to December, and will cover 30 offences of various kinds of legal provisions.

The final phase, which is from January to April next year, will involve other recorded offences in the e-Justice System, it said.

The office noted that the sentencing guidelines for the use of the magistrates’ and sessions courts in Sabah and Sarawak have been developed and adopted since February last year. – The Vibes, July 31, 2021

Related News

Malaysia / 3w

Appeals Court acquits, discharges Isa Samad of RM3 million corruption charges

Malaysia / 1mth

Jasmine Loo formerly worked for Jho Low, monthly salary RM45,000

Malaysia / 2mth

“I will be in court tomorrow, I will fight the charge,” says Daim’s wife

Opinion / 2mth

I beg your pardon – Rajan Navaratnam

Malaysia / 2mth

Malaysia's first stalking case - Court orders stalker to be admitted to Hospital Bahagia

Malaysia / 2mth

Man gets 65 years jail and 36 strokes for raping daughter in longhouse

Spotlight

Events

UK alumni lauded for stellar achievements as British Council observes 75 years in Malaysia

Malaysia

Don’t let politicians, activists stir up hatred against KK Mart, PBK tells cops

By The Vibes Team

Malaysia

7.7 mil people registered in Padu, 2.5 mil cyberattacks, but not one success: Rafizi

By Stephen Then

Malaysia

Farewell Aunty Bersih, you will be missed

By Ian McIntyre

Malaysia

Couple make two trips to workshop to find trapped kitten in car

Malaysia

KK Mart founder, director charged with wounding religious feelings of others over 'Allah' socks

By The Vibes Team

You may be interested

Malaysia

Sabah polls: We will let BN leadership decide on partners, says Bung

By Jason Santos

Malaysia

Nuzul Al-Quran: PM calls on Muslims to analyse, interpret the Quran

Malaysia

Muhyiddin files for leave to review Court of Appeal ruling reinstating power abuse charges

Malaysia

Attacks by minority groups on govt policies need to be curbed - Ahmad Zahid

Malaysia

Speed limit at George Town World Heritage Site reduced to 40 km/h

By Shahrim Tamrin

Malaysia

Food wastage, growing population major causes of global food shortage

By Ian McIntyre

Malaysia

Sabah orders immediate water supply to over 50,000 households

By Jason Santos

Malaysia

Padu: No need for excessive information unrelated to one’s financial status, says Abang Jo

By The Vibes Team