Malaysia

Najib can pay RM210 mil fine within his 12 years in jail: lawyers

Legal professionals say he could also pay in instalments, sell off property

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 24 Aug 2022 6:28PM

Najib can pay RM210 mil fine within his 12 years in jail: lawyers
Members of the legal fraternity have said that based on the principle of law, Datuk Seri Najib Razak (left) may pay the RM210 million fine imposed on him whenever he wants, as long as it is within the 12-year imprisonment he is currently serving. – AZIM RAHMAN/The Vibes pic, August 24, 2022

KUALA LUMPUR – It is still unclear whether Datuk Seri Najib Razak had paid the RM210 million fine imposed on him in the SRC International Sdn Bhd case or will do so later. 

Members of the legal fraternity referred to, however, are of the opinion that the 69-year-old former prime minister may pay the fine at any point of time during his 12-year jail period.

Lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla said that based on the principle of law, Najib may pay the fine whenever he wants, but if he doesn’t pay by the time his 12-year term is scheduled to end, an additional five years will be added as per the Federal Court’s ruling.

Lawyer Lim Wei Jiet also concurred with the same view, saying that there was no time limit imposed by the Federal Court on the duration of the payment.

“Hence, he can pay anytime during the 12 years,” said the counsel.

Meanwhile, lawyer M. Viswanathan was of the opinion that Najib could make instalments or even sell properties as provided in Section 283 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

“Normally, a reasonable amount of time will be given to make payment,” he said.

 After checks with the authorities, it was still unclear whether Najib had paid the fine or not.

Yesterday, the apex court upheld the conviction and 12 years’ jail sentence and RM210 million fine on Najib for misappropriating RM42 million of SRC International funds.

A five-member bench led by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat dismissed the former prime minister’s appeal to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the Kuala Lumpur High Court on July 28, 2020.

Najib had on December 8, 2021, failed to overturn the ruling after the court of appeal upheld the high court's decision. – Bernama, August 24, 2022

Related News

Malaysia / 3w

'A moment etched in memory' – A meeting through the glass: PMX recalls memories at Sungai Buloh Prison

Malaysia / 2mth

Najib marks 73rd birthday as legal battles continue from behind prison walls

Malaysia / 2mth

Rosmah asks for prayers as Najib prepares for medical procedure

Malaysia / 3mth

Syed Saddiq walks free: Federal Court upholds acquittal

Malaysia / 5mth

Najib obtains stay of execution on SRC’s US$1.3 billion judgment

Malaysia / 5mth

Najib's application to pause US$1.3b payment to SRC set for May 13

Spotlight

Malaysia

Haze: Schools in Johor, Melaka, and Negeri Sembilan to close tomorrow

Malaysia

Tun Mahathir’s health improves, but not ready to leave hospital

Malaysia

LPT3 row puts Kelantan’s infrastructure priorities under scrutiny

Malaysia

Terengganu royal family member sues two banks over RM1.99m missing from savings

Malaysia

Irene Sofiya murder probe referred to Johor prosecutors for review

Malaysia

Teacher denies negligence charges over fatal school SUV crash in Kota Bharu

Malaysia

Sulaiman Md Ali opts out of Melaka polls, will not defend Lendu

You may be interested

Malaysia

Malaysians warned against carrying strangers’ belongings overseas after Tokyo drug arrests

Malaysia

Four friends charged over murder of durian seller buried in Semenyih

Malaysia

Elderly woman loses RM202k after ‘monk’ promises her winning numbers

Malaysia

Irene Sofiya murder probe referred to Johor prosecutors for review

Malaysia

Zara Qairina’s mother: No doctors recorded injuries consistent with being beaten

Malaysia

No witnesses, CCTV or overnight patrols at hostel where Zara Qairina was found unconscious

Malaysia

Teacher denies negligence charges over fatal school SUV crash in Kota Bharu

Malaysia

Govt challenges US excess-capacity concerns as 100% chip tariff threat looms