Malaysia

[UPDATED] ‘Absurd’ to compare me to Dr Mahathir, says Anwar in suit against Pendang MP

Probes, prosecution by law enforcement are fair, independent, I did not interfere, stresses PM

Updated 3 years ago · Published on 31 May 2023 4:14PM

[UPDATED] ‘Absurd’ to compare me to Dr Mahathir, says Anwar in suit against Pendang MP
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim claims Pendang MP Datuk Awang Solahuddin Hashim (pic) uttered defamatory remarks against him at a press conference at the Parliament lobby when attending a Dewan Rakyat sitting last February 21. – Bernama pic, May 31, 2023

KUALA LUMPUR – Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim characterised as “totally absurd” the use of the term “zalim” (cruel) by Pendang MP Datuk Awang Solahuddin Hashim in describing the Pakatan Harapan chairman and comparing him to former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

The prime minister claimed that the move by Awang was driven by malice and that all references to Dr Mahathir were totally irrelevant and should not have been made.

“In doing so, the defendant has raised aggravating circumstances in this suit against me and I shall be entitled to substantial aggravated damages,” said Anwar in his reply to the defence statement that was filed yesterday (May 30).

According to the finance minister, the comparison made by the defendant is untenable.

Anwar stressed that investigations and prosecution by the enforcement agencies were fair, independent and impartial without fear or favour, and that he had never interfered in those matters.

Awang, in his defence statement filed on April 4 this year, claimed that Anwar, when he was brought to court to face charges of power abuse in 1998, initiated the movement which labelled Dr Mahathir as “zalim”.

The PAS MP compared the controversial “Operasi Lalang” crackdown that was carried out by Dr Mahathir’s government with Anwar’s alleged prosecution of political opponents after he was appointed prime minister.

Awang claimed that Dr Mahathir’s government made the controversial move six years after he was appointed as prime minister, while Anwar’s alleged prosecution of his political enemies took place within three months of his (Anwar) appointment as prime minister.

“This comparison that I refer to is in terms of the length of time the prosecution was made against the political opponents from the date of appointment, which is ‘worse’ or ‘worst’ in the history of Malaysia, surpassing Dr Mahathir.

“I do not mean to compare the plaintiff with Dr Mahathir from other aspects that are not related to the political prosecution that I am talking about in my statement (in the Parliament lobby),” he said in his defence statement.

Anwar, 75, filed the suit against Awang on March 3 over the latter’s allegedly defamatory remarks about the prime minister made at the Parliament lobby.

He claimed Awang uttered defamatory remarks against him at a press conference at the Parliament lobby when attending a Dewan Rakyat sitting last February 21.

According to Anwar, the remarks, which were recorded in audio and video formats, had been made public.

Anwar said the remarks implied that he is a vindictive and vengeful person, and had abused his power as prime minister and finance minister by interfering, disrupting and arbitrarily instructing Malaysian law enforcers and prosecutors to fuel his own political agenda.

He claimed Awang had deliberately and maliciously uttered and published the defamatory remarks to incite the public and create personal hatred against him.

Meanwhile, Anwar’s lawyer, Datuk S. N. Nair, told reporters that deputy registrar Aisyaf Falina Abdullah, during an e-Review proceeding, set June 15 for further case management.

“The court also instructs parties involved to file an interlocutory application, if any, by June 15 at the latest,” he added. – Bernama, May 31, 2023

Related News

Malaysia / 1w

Farhash files defamation suit against Rafizi

Malaysia / 2w

Teresa Kok’s defamation suit: Akmal Saleh ordered to pay RM300,000

Malaysia / 2mth

Defamation is a rich man’s game

Malaysia / 2mth

CPJ calls for withdrawal of excessive RM100m defamation suit against veteran journalist

Malaysia / 2mth

Is reputation worth so much more than a person’s life?

Opinion / 4mth

Why Bersama is not Malaysia’s best hope

Spotlight

Malaysia

Asyraf denies Najib ready to pay RM50m fine for house arrest

Malaysia

Malaysia’s average household size falls to 3.8 people

Malaysia

Najib's former wife Tengku Puteri Zainah in critical condition in ICU

Malaysia

More than 117,000 harmful online posts removed as government steps up enforcement

Malaysia

1,000 families receive Deepavali aid to ensure no one misses festive celebrations

Malaysia

Mother, daughter fined RM500 each for obstructing Muar council enforcement officers

Malaysia

Kelantan records 1,446 khalwat cases in three years

Malaysia

Negeri’s deposed Undang, chieftains fail to stop committal proceedings

You may be interested

Malaysia

Negeri’s deposed Undang, chieftains fail to stop committal proceedings

Malaysia

“Don’t panic,” Govt assures stable essential goods supply amid geopolitical tensions, monsoon threat

Malaysia

Ayer Keroh voters deserve answers on candidate's 2023 court case, says PH

Malaysia

Jamil Khir to mount legal challenge against charges over RM860.3m Tabung Haji transactions

Malaysia

DPM puts Malaysians facilitating illegal migrant activities on notice

Malaysia

SMEs need stronger financing, talent and management support to scale up – Fadillah

Malaysia

Attractive salaries, commissions help drive growth of scam centres in Malaysia

Malaysia

Insurers must not use litigation to wear down accident victims, court rules