Malaysia

Court allows prosecution to amend charge in Lim Guan Eng RM6.3 billion tunnel corruption case

Sessions Court rules amendment necessary to align charge with MACC Act provisions, says no prejudice to defence

Updated 3 months ago · Published on 06 May 2026 11:51AM

Court allows prosecution to amend charge in Lim Guan Eng RM6.3 billion tunnel corruption case
DPP argues that the amendment is in compliance with legal requirements and does not prejudice the defence - May 6, 2026

THE Sessions Court in Kuala Lumpur has allowed an application by the prosecution to amend the first charge against former Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng in connection with the RM6.3 billion undersea tunnel and major road construction project corruption case.

Judge Azura Alwi granted the application after finding that the amendment was necessary to ensure the charge complies with Section 23 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009.

She ruled that although the amendment was made at the final stage of the prosecution’s case, it would not prejudice or cause any unfairness to Lim.

The court also noted that both parties retain the right under Section 162 of the Criminal Procedure Code to recall relevant witnesses following the amendment to the charge.

“Therefore, the court allowed the prosecution’s application to amend the charge in accordance with Section 158 of the Criminal Procedure Code,” she said.

The amended charge concerns allegations that Lim, then Chief Minister of Penang, used his position to obtain RM3.3 million in connection with the appointment of a company linked to former Consortium Zenith Construction Sdn Bhd director Datuk Zarul Ahmad Mohd Zulkifli for the Penang Major Road and Undersea Tunnel Project valued at RM6.3 billion.

The alleged offences took place between January 2011 and August 2017 at the Chief Minister’s Office in Penang.

During earlier proceedings, Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said the amendment only involved removing the word “receiving”, while the alleged sum of RM3.3 million remained part of the charge.

He argued that the change did not prejudice the defence, as their position remained unchanged in that Lim had never received the RM3.3 million.

“The amendment is in compliance with legal requirements and does not prejudice the defence,” he said.

He further noted that Section 23 of the MACC Act 2009 does not specifically require proof of “receiving” or “requesting” gratification, but rather focuses on actions taken for the purpose of obtaining a bribe or benefit. - May 6, 2026

Spotlight

World

Series of explosions, fires hit three southern Thai provinces

Opinion

One more temple falls: The destruction of Malaysia’s soul?

Opinion

Why is Israel pushing toward confrontation with Türkiye?

Malaysia

‘Uncle Anwar’ sends representative to children’s entrepreneurs day in Subang Jaya

Malaysia

‘Look at temple dispute based on facts and laws’ – DAP reps tell Rayer

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Malaysia, Brunei set deadline to demarcate boundary, enhance border security

Malaysia

Police probe indecent act allegedly targeting woman in Sungai Petani

Malaysia

Sarawak postpones three major programmes over haze concerns

You may be interested

Malaysia

Kepong MP: Hadi has no immunity from law over alleged anti-DAP claims

Malaysia

Anwar, Pakistan PM call for dialogue as regional tensions rise

Malaysia

Woman killed by collapsing iron pole after car crashes into Kajang food court

Malaysia

Sarawak postpones three major programmes over haze concerns

Malaysia

Budget 2027: Cost of living to take centre stage as government weighs global risks

Malaysia

Fahmi: Malaysia’s one-China policy on Taiwan remains unchanged

Malaysia

Burnt Qurans found near Senawang football field, police investigate

Malaysia

Anwar approves additional RM1 million for Hindu crematorium in Seberang Prai