Malaysia

Najib blames SRC’s former management for losses of billions

Ex-PM dismisses allegations that investment decisions reflected his wishes, in trial at high court today

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 13 Apr 2022 6:37PM

Najib blames SRC’s former management for losses of billions
Former PM Datuk Seri Najib Razak stresses that he did not embezzle, misappropriate or convert any money from SRC, nor did he even intend to do so. – Bernama pic, April 13, 2022

KUALA LUMPUR – Former primer minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has claimed that billions of ringgits of SRC International Sdn Bhd’s funds were misappropriated through dubious investments authorised by the former directors under previous management.

He said out of over 31 “wrong-doings” purported to be discovered by the new management, 27 wrongdoings relate to the lack of proper due diligence and supervision over the affairs of SRC by its former guardians, which was the cause of losses of billions of ringgit. 

“The constitution of SRC entrusts the directors exclusively on matters relating to investments to be undertaken. If indeed the former trustees in whom confidence was reposed had closed a blind eye and allowed the proverbial wolf into the coop, the betrayal of confidence ought to have been inquired into,” he said.

Najib, 68, said this in his statement of defence filed on April 4 to reply to SRC’s US$1.18 billion (RM4.99 billion) civil suit against him.

He also contended that any wrongful transfers of funds out of the company were due to its previous management as discovered by the company’s new management.

Najib dismissed as ridiculous the allegation that SRC directors’ investment decisions reflected his wish as then prime minister.

The former finance minister also alleged that SRC’s board has exclusive powers in determining investment decisions and policies courtesy of Articles 74, 75, and 78 of the company’s memorandum and articles of association (M&A), as well as Section 131B of the Companies Act 1965.

In refuting SRC’s claim of fraud and wrongdoing, Najib said that the company’s own suit appeared to show that its eventual inability to repay the instalments that were due in 2015 was the result of the various unlawful acts of the SRC board.

Based on the circumstances surrounding Najib’s discharge of duties in public office, the former prime minister categorically denies committing any wrongdoing including the tort of misfeasance or abuse of public office or position, whether as PM or finance minister.

Najib stressed that he did not embezzle, misappropriate or convert any money from SRC or defraud SRC in any way, nor did he even intend to do so, and was not motivated by ulterior or improper motives, dishonesty or recklessness.

He also claimed that Article 117 of SRC’s M&A itself prevents the adviser emeritus (Najib) from ever issuing advice unilaterally to the government-linked company. 

Najib claimed that as per SRC’s corporate governance structure, advice from the adviser emeritus was subject to requests from the board.

He said that any such advice was limited to material matters and those of strategic interest to Malaysia and could not have affected any matter within the board’s exclusive powers.

Thus, Najib added that throughout the material time, he acted in good faith and discharged his duty as then prime minister and finance minister to further the national interest.

On May 7 2021, SRC under its new management filed legal action against Najib and its former directors – Datuk Suboh Md Yassin, Datuk Mohammed Azhar Osman Khairuddin, Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil, Datuk Che Abdullah @ Rashidi Che Omar, Datuk Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi and Tan Sri Ismee Ismail – but later removed the six other names from the suit, retaining Najib as the sole defendant.

SRC as a plaintiff, in the writ of summons, alleged that Najib had abused his power and obtained personal benefits from SRC funds as well as misappropriated the funds. 

SRC, which is now wholly owned by Finance Ministry Incorporated, is seeking general, exemplary and additional damages, as well as interest, costs and other appropriate relief deemed fit by the court. – Bernama, April 13, 2022

Related News

Malaysia / 1mth

Rosmah: ‘There was no obligation for me to buy any of the jewellery’

Opinion / 1y

A tribute revisited: Why I needed hope

Malaysia / 1y

1MDB trial postponed again as Najib remains in hospital

Malaysia / 1y

1MDB trial postponed as Najib warded at HKL

Malaysia / 1y

Jho Low didn’t represent Najib, says Shafee in 1MDB trial

Malaysia / 1y

Najib brought Malaysia to excellence, says Zahid’s daughter

Spotlight

Malaysia

Bersatu-PH tie-up a possibility as coalition seeks Malay support, analyst says

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Woman molested on her way home from work (video)

Malaysia

Court allows Daim's daughter to permanently keep passport

Malaysia

Santiago pokes holes in data centre hype, asks: Who really benefits?

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Jeweller vows to pursue Rosmah until ‘every penny’ is recovered as RM67.5m battle enters enforcement phase

Malaysia

Ambulance carrying two injured men crashes en route to hospital after MPV collision in Besut

Malaysia

Man blames 'lack of love' for sexual assault on teens

Business

BNM's OPR to stay at 2.75 pcent in 2026 amid strong domestic demand - Kenanga IB

Malaysia

Missing jewellery: Rosmah ordered to pay RM67.5 million

You may be interested

Malaysia

Tuanku Muhriz is still the legitimate Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan - KJ

Malaysia

Hannah Yeoh defends unity government model, says leadership is about cooperation, not exclusion

Malaysia

Authorities press on AI photo crackdown as national passport enters global elite

Malaysia

Undangs accused of clinging to power as directive raises questions over legitimacy

Malaysia

Johor polls: UMNO asserts independence from federal Unity Government agreement

Malaysia

Rohingya issue requires regional, multi-agency approach, says Deputy IGP

Malaysia

Fiscal deficit target under pressure as surging subsidy costs test Malaysia’s consolidation plans

Malaysia

Simpang Renggam tragedy: Teenager released on police bail